| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by upgrading his bad conduct discharge to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in nine years of service with no other adverse action; that the testimonial evidence specifically stated that his behavior and health were adversely affected after the Persian Gulf War; that he had six months remaining on active duty at the time of his discharge, and he was serving on a hardship tour in West Germany and had been extended for the convenience of the Government; and that his accomplishments after his discharge are indicative of an individual determined to succeed in spite of adversities. In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his court-martial proceedings, custody papers, testimonies from acquaintances and his educational achievements.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel makes no contentions.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 August 1985 for a period of 3 years. He completed one station unit training (OSUT) at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. In December 1985, upon completion of OSUT he was awarded the Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannoneer).
The applicant was promoted to pay grades E-3, E-4 and E-5 on 20 August 1986, 1 May 1987, and 1 July 1989, respectively.
On 28 August 1992, while assigned to Germany, the applicant’s commander preferred court-martial charges against him and recommended he be tried by a general court-martial for resisting apprehension, damaging military property of a value less than $100.00 (forced open a closed door in government leased quarters), assault consummated by battery (struck his spouse on the face with his closed fist), aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon (struck his spouse on her face, arms and hand with a hot clothes iron), housebreaking, and breaking restriction.
On 27 October 1992, the applicant, represented by legal counsel, pled guilty to the aforementioned charges and was convicted by general court-martial. The record of trial indicates that the applicant was questioned on each element of the charges by the Military Judge and after indicating he understood said elements, pled guilty to each.
The applicant’s court-martial record makes only passing reference to one witness’ observations that the applicant had changed after returning from the Gulf War, who stated, “He start[ed] more or less staying to himself”. This reference is insufficient to establish that the applicant and his wife, at that time, suffered from post traumatic stress disorder or Gulf War Syndrome.
The applicant was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for nine months and reduction to pay grade E-1.
On 31 March 1993, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence. The execution of the applicant’s punitive discharge was withheld pending completion of further appellate review.
On 4 May 1993 the applicant was released from confinement and placed on excess leave pending appellate review of his bad conduct discharge.
General Court-Martial Order 12, dated 27 February 1995, stated that the U.S. Army Court of Military Review had finally affirmed the findings and sentence to a bad conduct discharge and ordered the discharge to be duly executed. Accordingly, on 20 April 1995 he was discharged, in absentia, after completing
9 years, 2 months and 12 days of active duty service.
There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant ever petitioned the U.S. Court of Military Appeals for a review of his case.
Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, section IV, provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
Subsequent to his discharge the applicant earned an Associate of Technology Degree in Building Construction in May 1997 from Bessemer State Technical College, in Alabama, and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Social Work from the University of Alabama in December 2001.
The applicant submits several letters of support from his friends and colleagues.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. The applicant’s claim that testimonial evidence was presented at his court-martial hearing that his behavior and health were adversely affected after the Persian Gulf War is not substantiated by the transcript of the hearing.
3. While the Board notes the applicant’s post-service conduct and achievements, none of these factors, either individually or in sum, warrant the relief requested.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence to show that there was an error or injustice in this case.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JLP___ __AAO_ __RKS__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002068240 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020604 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070880C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military record shows: Notwithstanding the applicant's prior honorable service and his service in the Persian Gulf War, the Board does not find that his service was so meritorious as to outweigh the offenses that resulted in his general court-martial conviction and bad conduct discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016152
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. Accordingly, he was discharged on 15 November 2006 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), by reason of court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005328C080410
Gerard W. Schwartz | |Acting Director | | | | |Analyst | The following members, a quorum, were present: | | | |Chairperson | | | | |Member | | | | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his bad conduct discharge (BCD). On 5 March 2004, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 3, as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007322
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 August 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007322 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010222
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge (HD). Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005767
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant contends that his bad conduct discharge should be upgraded because he was immature and wild, his actions did not justify a bad conduct discharge, and he has been a responsible person since he was discharged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013023
The general court-martial convening authority approved the finding and sentence, but reduced the confinement to 15 months and, except for the bad conduct discharge, he ordered the sentence executed. The applicant was discharged on 17 September 2010 due to court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 3. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002387
On 25 October 1995, the findings of guilty and the sentence were affirmed by the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals. On 21 March 1997, his bad conduct discharge was ordered executed and on 25 April 1997, he was issued a bad conduct discharge as a result of his court-martial conviction. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017434
On 29 March 1985, the United States Army Court of Military Review considered the record of trial in the applicant's case. At issue before the Court was whether the military judge erred by considering, during sentencing, portions of a record of trial from a prior general court-martial of the applicant. The applicant contends that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions because he was introduced to drugs and alcohol by Soldiers...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013651
He states, in effect, he would like his discharge upgraded so he would be eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits as an Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm veteran who served honorably from 1987 through 1996. The applicant's military records show he was appointed in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Medical Services Corps as a captain on 23 June 1987 with 10 years of constructive service credit. Due to the unavailability of records, AHRC officials were unable to provide the...