| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the last name in her records, to include her separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show her married name; and that Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post Vietnam Era Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program-VEAP) of her DD Form 214 be corrected.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that she would like her married name to appear in all her military records and that Item 15a of her DD Form 214 was incorrectly marked to indicate that she did not participate in an educational assistance program. In support of her application, she provides a copy of her marriage certificate, a copy of a Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 1984-New G.I. Bill (DA Form 2366), and copies of leave and earnings statements (LES) showing that money was deducted from her military pay for the New G.I. Bill.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 28 May 1993, and continuously served on active duty for 4 years until being honorably separated on 27 May 1997. The applicant’s enlistment contract, personnel records prepared upon her entry on active duty, and all orders and documents on file in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), all contain the same last name, her maiden name, which is the name under which she performed all her military service.
The DD Form 214 issued to and authenticated by the applicant with her signature on the date of her separation, confirms that she was released from active duty on 27 May 1997, at the expiration of her term of service. The last name recorded in this document is the same one recorded in her enlistment contract, her personnel record, and under which she served throughout her active duty tenure. Item 15a contains an “x” in the “No” box, indicating that the applicant did not contribute to the VEAP.
In support of her application, she provides a marriage certificate, which confirms she was married and assumed a new last name on 16 October 1997, five months subsequent to her separation from active duty. In addition, she provides a
DA Form 2336, which confirms that she enlisted with the option to participate in the New G.I. Bill, and copies of LES that verify that money was collected from her military pay for the G.I. Bill.
Army Regulation 635-40 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the active Army. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214. Paragraph 2-4 contains item by item instructions for completion of the DD Form 214 and it states, in pertinent part, that Item 1 will contain the name taken from the soldier’s personnel record.
The instructions for completing Item 15 (Post Vietnam Veterans Education Assistance Program-VEAP states, in pertinent part, that for any soldier that contributed to VEAP and did not receive money back, mark Yes; for any soldier who enlisted before 1984, contributed to VEAP, and received their money back, mark No; and for any soldier who enlisted after 1985, mark No.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s request that her last name be changed in her military records. However, it finds insufficient reason to grant this requested relief. The validity of the marriage certificate provided by the applicant is not in question, and it clearly confirms that she legally changed her last name on the date she was married. However, this document also verifies that the marriage and resultant name change did not occur until 16 October 1997, over 5 months subsequent to her separation from active duty.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s military records reflect the last name under which her military service was performed. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.
3. The applicant’s marriage license contains both the last name under which she performed her military service and her new last name. In the opinion of the Board, the presentation of this document in concert with the appropriate military records will serve to confirm her military service for whatever purpose necessary and satisfy any questions that may arise in regard to her service related entitlements and benefits. Therefore, the Board concludes changing the last name of the applicant in her military records is not warranted at this time.
4. The Board also notes the applicant’s request that Item 15a of her DD Form 214 be corrected. However, it concludes that there is no error or injustice associated with this entry. Item 15a of the DD Form 214 in question pertains only to the VEAP, an educational assistance program that existed prior to 1985, and which was replaced by the New G.I. Bill. By regulation, a “No” response is required to be entered in this item for any solider who entered active duty after 1985.
5. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant entered active duty in 1993, that she participated in the New G.I. Bill, and that the “No” entry contained in Item 15a of her DD Form 214 is correct. Therefore, the Board concludes there is no basis for granting this requested relief.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
SAC KWL JTM DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002068204 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/07 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1997/05/27 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | ETS |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 1021 | 100.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010183
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant essentially states that her military records are wrong, she contributed $1,200.00 to the MGIB and she is entitled to benefits. The applicant contends that her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that she contributed to the MGIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004430
The applicant requests correction of item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" instead of "No." The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 14 April 2003, in support of his request. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the VEAP.
CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2011-243
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On October 20, 2011, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted an advisory opinion recommending that the Board deny relief in accordance with a memorandum submitted by the Commander, Personnel Service Center (PSC). Block 18 of the DD 214 correctly includes the following comment with regard to MGIB:...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000427C070206
The applicant requests that her 2001 separation document be corrected to reflect that she participated in the VEAP (Veteran's Educational Assistance Program), that she is entitled to a second award of the National Defense Service Medal and any other awards authorized for active duty Soldiers. The evidence also confirms that the applicant was on active duty on 11 September 2001 as is therefore entitled to a second award of the National Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017509
The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 2003, that shows he was honorably retired from active duty after completing a total of 20 years and 19 days active service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the New GI Bill (i.e., the MGIB) on 3 March 1997. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicants retirement from active duty is not designed to show an individuals contribution to the MGIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011984
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his separation document, DD Form 214, with a separation date of 30 June 1999, be corrected to mark Item 15a, Member contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), as Yes. 2. Any Soldier entering the service between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985 was eligible to participate in the program.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013173
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military personnel records show she enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 August 1989 for a period of 6 years. The applicant's records show she elected the New MGIB and paid $1,200 during her first 12 months of active service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607063C070209
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show his pay grade as E-4 and to show that he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). His military records show that he enlisted with no prior service in pay grade E-1 on 21 February 1989. Bill (MGIB), as outlined in title 38, United States Code, chapter 30, section 3011, provides for soldiers who entered the service after 30 June...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086923C070212
The applicant also requests that Block 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program) of the DD Form 214 be changed from "No" to "Yes." The applicant stated in his continuation of the DD From 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, "Member contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted on 15 August 1985.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013256
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Also, there is no regulatory requirement to include a statement on the DD Form 214 which shows whether or not a Soldier contributed to the MGIB or not. Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the applicants DD Form 214 to show that he paid into the MGIB.