| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Physical disability retirement.
He states that his discharge because of hardship should be changed to a medical discharge so that he can get a military identification card. He states that he has had trouble with his right leg ever since he was discharged from the Army.
He encloses copies of medical records with his request. Those records show that he was treated for lower back pain on 21 January 1974. He was treated because of a sharp pain to his right foot on 29 April 1974. He was treated for an injury to his right ankle on 2 May 1974, again on 10 May 1974, and also on 13 May 1974, with the examining physician stating that there was no swelling or discoloration to his ankle, but that it was slightly sprained. He was treated for mild congestion on 16 May 1974, and for a cold on 4 June 1974. He was treated for severe coughing and throat irritation on 14 November 1974, and for a chest cold and congestion on 18 November 1974. On 24 April 1975 the applicant was treated for an injury to his right hand. On 28 April 1975 he was seen because of his right hand injury.
Those records also contain a report of medical examination dated 10 July 1975 which shows that the applicant was medically qualified for discharge. The applicant indicated on that report that he was in good health.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Army for three years on 16 April 1974, completed training and in September 1974 was assigned to an armored battalion in Germany.
The applicant went on emergency leave to the United States and was attached to the 7th Infantry Division at Fort Ord, California effective on 26 June 1975 for the purpose of applying for a hardship discharge.
On 7 July 1975 the applicant applied for a hardship discharge because of the medical condition of his wife. His request was approved. He was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, on 14 August 1975. He had 1 year, 3 months, and 29 days of service.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 6 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the separation of personnel because of genuine dependency or hardship. An application for such separation will be approved when a service member can substantiate that his situation or immediate family's situation has been aggravated to an excessive degree since enlistment, that the condition is not temporary and that discharge will improve the situation.
Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
Army Regulation 635-40, states in pertinent part that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.
Army Regulation 635-40, also provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
There is no evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, to indicate that he was medically unfit at the time of his discharge. To the contrary, evidence exists to show that he was medically fit for discharge; consequently, there is no basis correct his record to show physical disability retirement.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 14 August 1975, the date of his discharge . The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 14 August 1978.
The application is dated 11 January 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant’s entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant’s failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JLP __ __BJE __ __TL____ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2002067949 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020521 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 142.00 |
| 2. | 108.00 |
| 3. | 360 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000530
On 24 April 1975, approximately a year after his discharge, he applied for a waiver to again enlist in the RA and the EEA denied his request contending that he had two disqualifications, one being a medical defect and the other that he had been discharged for hardship/dependency. His medical records for this enlistment are not available for review with this case. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show he was unfit for separation or that he could not perform the duties of his rank...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016665
His request for a hardship discharge was approved and on 20 May 1974 he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-13B, due to hardship. It must also be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that at the time the applicant underwent his separation physical that medical personnel properly determined his medical condition, if he had any, did not warrant consideration under the Physical Disability Evaluation System and/or referral to a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072143C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. She states that she was discharged without being compensated, and that she was never given a separation physical before she was discharged. On 13 February 2001 the VA granted her a 30 percent service connected disability rating for pyelolithotomy, effective 16 May 2000.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000050
He provided medical records from the Department of Corrections, dated between 1985 and 2004, which show he was treated for the following complaints: * left foot/ankle problem * ingrown toenails * jock itch and athletes foot * left foot pain * cough/congestion * left knee pain * cold feet 4. He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 22 March 1979 in the rank of SP4 for completion of his required active service and he was transferred to U.S. Army Reserve Control Group...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072180C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. If the medical board finds that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059911C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, to indicate that his discharge was unfair or unjust, or that he was physically unfit at the time of his discharge, and as such there is not basis to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088653C070403
The applicant provides a statement from his service representative and extracts from his service medical and Department of Veterans Affairs medical records in support of his request. Counsel requests that the applicant records be corrected to show that he received “an honorable medical discharge from the military service.” The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs may now be struggling with an appropriate label for the applicant’s condition nearly 30 years after his discharge is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003865C070206
DA Form 2166-4 (Enlisted Efficiency Report), dated 12 December 1973, shows the FSM was rated "excellent" for duty performance. Although the applicant contends that the FSM had many episodes of sickness and debilitating problems while he was on active duty, and service medical records show he was hospitalized and treated for anemia and pancreatitis while in the Army, the FSM was found qualified for separation with a physical profile of 111121 by competent medical authorities on 29...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021258
His record does not contain any documentation to show he revealed his medical condition to the USAR at the time of his enlistment. a. Paragraph 3-21 (Heart) states the causes for referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) include but is not limited to cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or congestive heart failure due to fixed obstructive coronary artery disease or coronary artery spasm. d. Paragraph 9-12 (Request for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)) states that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009608
During the examination the applicant stated that the mass had been present since he was 3 years old and the physician noted that he was not sure if the mass could be removed. The applicant's Report of Medical History, dated 25 June 1975, shows that at the time of his examination, the applicant stated that he had two operations on his neck. It states, in pertinent part, that individuals who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for induction...