Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067902C070402
Original file (2002067902C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067902

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. Member
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that she was eligible for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP).

APPLICANT STATES: She was told at the time of her enlistment that she was eligible for the SLRP.

In support of her request she submits a copy of her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, which shows that she enlisted with no prior service in pay grade E-2 on 18 March 1994. Also submitted by the applicant is a DA Form 5261-R, Selected Reserve Incentive Program – Enlistment Bonus Addendum, for a $2,000.00 enlistment bonus. The applicant entered 18 March 1994 as the date that she signed that form. An individual other than her guidance counselor entered 12 September 1994 as the date that he signed for her guidance counselor. The applicant also submits a DA Form 5261-4-R, Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum, for up to $10,000.00 in student loan repayment. Both the applicant and guidance counselor entered 18 March 1994 as the date they signed this form. However, the applicant’s guidance counselor’s signature on that form is different than his signature on the applicant’s DD Form 4.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records could not be located. The following information is taken from documents provided by the applicant, herself.

On 1 October 1999, the applicant’s commander submitted a request for exception to policy to pay the applicant the SLRP. On 5 November 2001, the Office of the Chief, Army Reserve (OCAR) denied that request, stating that the applicant’s military occupational specialty was not on the list of those approved for any reenlistment incentives. The OCAR also noted that the applicant’s DA Form 5261-4-R contained two dates and stated that the addendum “appears to have been completed after the contract date.”

Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of reserve enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 provides for individuals who were promised a benefit in conjunction with their enlistment or reenlistment which the Army cannot honor. These individuals have the option of either requesting immediate discharge or waiving the benefit and remaining in the USAR.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s MOS was not a skill approved for the SLRP. As such, she is not entitled to have her loans paid under that program.

2. While it is unfortunate she was led to believe she qualified for the SLRP, to grant the applicant’s request would be giving her a benefit not available to other reservists with non-qualifying MOS’s who were properly not given a SLRP addendum during their enlistments.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JNS__ ____EJA_ __TL____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067902
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020625
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072517C070403

    Original file (2002072517C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she initiated a SLRP contract for $20,000.00 as indicated in the DA Form 5261-4-R (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) she includes with her application. In a 30 May 2001 memorandum the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Office at Fort McCoy stated that although the applicant’s DA Form 5261-4-R was executed with an entitlement of $20,000, she was only eligible for a $10,000 entitlement and payments would be made for that entitlement. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000883C070206

    Original file (20050000883C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her US Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract be honored and that she be paid $10,000 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). During the enlistment process, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding), acknowledging she was enlisting for MOS 73C (Finance Specialist) and that the MOS qualified for a $10,000 loan repayment under the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000883C070206

    Original file (20050000883C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her US Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract be honored and that she be paid $10,000 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). During the enlistment process, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding), acknowledging she was enlisting for MOS 73C (Finance Specialist) and that the MOS qualified for a $10,000 loan repayment under the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605309C070209

    Original file (9605309C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that she executed a Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) addendum to her enlistment contract which was properly validated by her recruiter and that her student loans be paid for in accordance with the terms of that addendum. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: She enlisted in the Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 August 1986 for 6 years in pay grade E-3. The applicant was never completed a properly countersigned SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013196

    Original file (20100013196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his record be corrected to show he is eligible for Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) benefits promised in his enlistment contract. Chapter 5 of Army Regulation 135-7 authorizes student loan repayment for qualified Selected Reserve enlisted personnel. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the Army authorizes him to receive the $10,000.00 SLRP benefits agreed to and authorized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100729C070208

    Original file (2004100729C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant enlisted in the US Army Reserve, for 8 years, on 28 February 1996. The enlistment-related documents, which the applicant submitted and which require a date, show a variation of the date, 28 February 1996 (i.e., 96 FEB 28, 960228, 96/02/28) with exception of DA Form 5261-4-R, Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum, and DD Form 1966/2, Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States. Because the date on the Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014720

    Original file (20110014720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states the following: * she attended college at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington from August 2004 to May 2008 * she obtained several Sallie Mae Signature Student Loans totaling $58,488.79 * in January 2010, she reported to the Wilmington, NC recruiting station and was offered the following incentives: * a $15,000 Enlistment (cash) Bonus * the Montgomery GI Bill plus the $350 kicker * the $40,000 Student Loan Repayment Program * she specifically informed the recruiter that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04103567C070208

    Original file (04103567C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, the applicant requests that her records be corrected to show that she was entitled to the $10,000.00 loan repayment incentive as depicted in her 24 November 1992 reenlistment contract. Notwithstanding the fact that her MOS was ineligible for the SLRP incentive, the applicant reenlisted in the Army for 6 years and contracted to serve in MOS 94B with the understanding that she was entitled to a maximum of $10,000.00 in loan repayments. Therefore, and notwithstanding the advisory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607755C070209

    Original file (9607755C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: He was promised the SLRP by his unit’s retention NCO and, as a student of higher education with outstanding student loans, had counted on the SLRP benefits. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He reenlisted on 6 November 1994 for 6 years in pay grade E-6. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510035C070209

    Original file (9510035C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His enlistment contract indicates he enlisted for training in specialty 98G (Electronic Warfare/Signal Intelligence Voice Interceptor) and participation in the Student Loan Repayment Program. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was eligible for and enlisted in the Army Reserve with the understanding that he would receive the SLRP as an enlistment option. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual...