| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Beverly A. Young | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Mr. Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
2. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge.
3. The applicant states that he feels that he is entitled to the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge for combat in Vietnam. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 and Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision, dated 4 December 2001.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army on 16 July 1969 for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and served in Vietnam from 11 January 1970 through 25 November 1970 as a wheel vehicle mechanic. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 26 January 1972.
5. The applicant’s DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand at the time of his separation from the Service, does not show the Purple Heart or Combat Infantryman Badge as authorized awards. The Board notes that the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which is also not shown on his discharge document.
6. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His personnel records do not contain medical evidence which indicates he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entry in item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).
7. The applicant provided a 4 December 2001 DVA Rating Decision which shows he received service connection for shrapnel wound scar of right upper arm with "0" percent disability rating. The DVA Rating Decision stated that the applicant’s service medical records from 16 July 1969 through 26 January 1972 were reviewed and they failed to show any complaints, treatment, or findings of shrapnel wound of right upper arm. The applicant reported that he had been hit with shrapnel superficially in the right upper arm during combat. He further reported that he "removed the shrapnel himself at the time of the injury and had no complications."
8. The applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he served in a wireman duty position and wheel vehicle repairman duty position with the 125th Signal Battalion of the 25th Infantry Division in Vietnam.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 5, dated 1973.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. The Awards Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board noted the applicant’s request for issuance of award of the Purple Heart for combat in Vietnam. However, there is no military medical record or other evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was wounded as a result of hostile action or was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
2. The Board noted the DVA decision to award service connection for shrapnel wound scar of right upper arm was established as directly related to military service. However, this decision is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart, particularly in view of the evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded and did not receive the Purple Heart. The DVA stated there was no medical record of treatment of wounds and the applicant signed his own discharge and authenticated his own DA Form 20 which attested that he was not wounded and did not receive the Purple Heart.
3. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that the available evidence is not sufficient to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.
4. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant was not awarded an infantry military occupational specialty. He did not serve in an infantry unit or infantry position in combat during his assignment in Vietnam. Therefore, there is no basis for granting award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.
5. Orders show the applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this foreign unit award.
6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
FNE_____ RTD____ RWA____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn_______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002067829 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020611 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT IN PART |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Schneider |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | 107.0111 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067054C070402
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant’s unit, 4th Battalion, 23rd Infantry, of the 25th Infantry Division, was also cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971. However, evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064741C070421
Counsel also noted that the DVA rating decision granted service connection for shrapnel wounds to his shoulder and that the wounds are consistent with his history of being wounded in Vietnam. The rating decision states that the applicant’s service medical records were reviewed when his claim was considered and denied in 1989. The Board noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal or any unit awards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000614
The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart, because he received shrapnel wounds to the right side of his head in March 1970, while serving as an Infantry Unit Commander in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show three bronze service stars to be affixed on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001817C070208
The applicant states that he had a shrapnel wound in Vietnam. In so doing, the VA noted that although his service medical records showed no evidence of a shrapnel wound, reasonable doubt was resolved in his favor that this [his wound] was a residual from a combat injury. The VA, in awarding the applicant a service connected disability for residuals [shrapnel] in his right arm, stated that his service medical records showed no evidence of a shrapnel wound, and despite this lack of evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004887C070208
The applicant submitted a copy of medical records from the DVA which shows that he was granted a service connected rating of 0 percent for residuals of shrapnel injury to the left anterior thigh effective 10 April 2003. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 14 March 1968 to 18 December 1969 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086704C070212
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records: He requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that his Army Commendation Medal is with a “V” device. His records contain a copy of Headquarters, 1 st Brigade, 101 st Airborne Division, General Orders 342, dated 7 August 1967 awarding him the Army Commendation Medal with “V” device for heroism on 20 April 1966.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005988
Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time when the service member was discharged, required that throughout a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal the enlisted person must have had all excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. The applicant's records show that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004719C070206
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds incurred in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060063C070421
He states that he received the Purple Heart for the one wound that he received on 5 March, and for the wounds that he received on 30 April and 4 May, but not for the other two wounds. However, a clinical record cover sheet indicates that the applicant was wounded in the left leg and the left shoulder, that he was admitted to the 36 th on 7 March 1967 and returned to duty on 12 March 1967. The 24 October 1967 report of medical history shows that the applicant indicated that he received a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009541C070208
The applicant’s records contain a document, dated 1 November 1968 which shows that the applicant was medevaced on or about 22 September 1968. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the Vietnam. Therefore his records should be corrected to show this award.