| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member | ||
| Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the unit listed in Item 6 (Organization) of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that the unit listed in his separation document, the 562nd Quartermaster Company, is incorrect. He claims that the unit he served in was actually designated the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company. He also indicates that his reason for requesting this change is that his unit was a combat unit that continually served on the front, providing support to the infantry, and he would like to receive all the awards to which he is entitled based on his service in this unit.
4. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost in that fire.
5. The available evidence includes a separation document (WD AGO Form
53-55) that confirms that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 26 July 1943, and that he continuously served on active duty until being honorably separated, in the rank of corporal, on
24 October 1945.
6. Item 6 (Organization) of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 contains the entry “562nd QM Co”, which indicates this was his unit of assignment. The separation document also confirms that the applicant served in the European Theater of Operations (ETO), from 26 April 1944 through 18 October 1945, and that he participated in the Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, and Central Europe campaigns of World War II. This document also lists the following awards earned by the applicant during his tenure on active duty: European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars and a bronze arrowhead, denoting his participation in four campaigns and his receiving assault landing credit for Normandy; and the Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable active duty service.
7. During the review of this case, the Board staff reviewed unit historical files maintained at the National Archives. These historical records confirm the
562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company was assigned to the 562nd Quartermaster Battalion, 562nd Quartermaster Group. While the applicant’s assignment could not be verified using these records, they do confirm that there was no unit that was designated simply as the 562nd Quartermaster Company, as indicated in the applicant’s separation document.
8. Technical Manual 12-235, which prescribed the policy and procedure for the preparation and distribution of separation documents during the period in question, states that the last unit, or similar element to which the individual was assigned will be entered in item 6 (Organization) of the WD AGO Form 53-55.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 5-11 contains guidance on awarding the World War II Victory Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded for service between 7 December 1941 and
31 December 1946, both dates inclusive.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Campaign Participation Credit Register-World War II) establishes the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during World War II. This source confirms that the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company received assault landing credit for Normandy, occupation of Germany credit, and the French Croix de Guerre during his tenure of assignment in the ETO. The unit listing contained in this publication contains no other company sized Quartermaster unit with a number designation 562nd.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the unit listed in his separation document is incorrect and it finds this claim has merit. While the available evidence does not firmly establish that the applicant was assigned to the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company, as he alleges, it does verify that there was no other company sized Quartermaster unit with a number designation of 562nd or a specific unit identified as simply the 562nd Quartermaster Company, as is indicated in his separation document.
2. Historical records maintained at the National Archives does confirm that the there was a unit designated the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company that was part of the 562nd Quartermaster Battalion, and the unit listings in DA Pamphlet 672-1 contain only one company listing for a Quartermaster Company with a number designation of 562nd, which is the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company.
3. In the opinion of the Board, the available evidence sufficiently corroborates the applicant’s claim that his unit was the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company and not simply the 562nd Quartermaster Company, as is currently recorded in his separation document. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to correct his records accordingly at this time.
4. In addition, based on his World War II service, and the determination of the Board that he served in the 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company during his tenure of assignment in the ETO, the Board also finds that he is entitled to have the Army of Occupation Medal-Germany, French Croix de Guerre, and World War II Victory Medal added to the awards already listed in his separation document.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending Item 6 (Organization) of the WD AGO 53-55 of the individual concerned to read 562nd Railhead Quartermaster Company; by showing he earned the Army of Occupation Medal-Germany, French Croix de Guerre, and World War II Victory Medal; and by issuing him a corrected separation document that reflects these changes.
BOARD VOTE:
_SK___ ___JTM__ __TEO____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Stanley Kelley _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR200206777774 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/06 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1945/10/24 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-365 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Demobilization |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 1021 | 100.0000 |
| 2. 46 | 107.0000 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004730
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show the: * French Croix de Guerre * French Fourragere * Netherlands Orange Lanyard * Belgian Fourragere * Belgian Croix de Guerre (properly known as the Order of the Day of the Belgian Army) 2. The applicant's military records are not available for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008601
The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and was held as a POW; b. general orders awarded the applicant's unit the: * Presidential Unit Citation * French Croix de Guerre * Belgian Fourragere * Netherlands Orange Lanyard c. the applicant is advised that there is no individual emblem presented to or worn by former Soldiers who were in a unit cited once by the French...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004297
The applicant states there is no record of 79th Infantry Division unit awards on his discharge document. The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. The unit was awarded the French Fourragere based on Department of the Army General Order 43, dated 1950.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088691C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge, be corrected to add the Ardennes-Alsace Campaign and the recently awarded Bronze Star Medal. The applicant arrived in the United States on 25 October 1945. a. awarding the applicant: a bronze service star, for his participation in the Ardennes Alsace Campaign, to be affixed along with the already-authorized silver service star to his European-African-Middle Eastern...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008250
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the French Fourragere and all other authorized awards. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing orders awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 7 December 1942 to 11 October 1945 (Standard Name Line: PFC 327th Glider...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021586
The applicant requests his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) be corrected to show he was assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment (PIR) and to add the following unit awards: * Netherlands Military Order of William * French Croix de Guerre/Fourragere * Belgian Fourragere 2. The bronze service star is also affixed to the Parachutist Badge to denote participation in a combat parachutist jump, retroactive to 7 December...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008440
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 33 (Decorations and Awards) of the FSM's separation document shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: European-African-Middle Eastern (EAME) Campaign Medal with 1 bronze service star; Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM); and American Theater Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003191
The FSM's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record also shows that an award of the Combat Infantryman Badge is considered to be a citation in orders for the Bronze Star Medal for service during World War II. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement for exemplary conduct in ground combat during...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004243
The FSM's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing orders and a DA Form 4980-10 (Purple Heart Certificate) awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the European Theater of Operations on 27 February 1945; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083510C070212
The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. The applicant’s reconstructed record shows that on 28 May 1991, DA, ARPERCEN, issued a correction to the applicant’s separation document (DD Form 215), which added the CIB and Bronze Star Medal to the list of authorized awards earned by the applicant during his tenure on active duty. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that based on his unit service in the...