Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067730C070402
Original file (2002067730C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 14 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067730


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an effective date of 29 August 1990 to show that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman) for 2 years and 9 months; correction of item 5 (Date of Birth) to show 25 January 1969; and correction of item
27 (Reentry Code) to show reentry (RE) code 1A.

3. The applicant states that he served in MOS 11C for 2 years and 9 months, that his date of birth is incorrect and that his RE code should be RE-1A. In support of his application, he submits a DD Form 215 (Correction of DD Form 214) prepared on 26 June 1992; a DD Form 214 with an effective date of
14 March 1991; a DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990; an award certificate for the Good Conduct Medal for the period 30 December 1987 to 3 September 1990; and a copy of his Birth Certificate.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 4 September 1987 for a period of 3 years. He served as an indirect fire infantryman and was honorably discharged on 29 August 1990 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, for convenience of the Government, 1990 Early Transition Program. On 31 January 1991, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. He was honorably released from active duty on 14 March 1991.

5. Item 11 (Primary Specialty) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an effective date of 29 August 1990 shows that he served in MOS 11C for 1 year and 9 months. Item 5 (Date of Birth) on this DD Form 214 shows he was born on 15 November 1986 and item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry, “2B.”

6. The applicant’s service personnel records show that he was awarded primary MOS 11C.

7. The applicant’s Birth Certificate shows that he was born on 25 January 1969.

8. The applicant was issued a DD Form 215, dated 26 June 1992, which amended his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 14 March 1991 to show his correct date of birth. However, there is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990 was amended to show his correct date of birth.

9. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

10. Paragraph 3-27 of Army Regulation 601-210 provides that RE Codes may be changed only if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

11. RE-1A, in effect at the time, applied to careerists with over 6 years of service for pay (over 4 years service for pay if separated on or after 15 August 1978). The RE code indicated the soldier was fully qualified for reenlistment.

12. RE-2B, in effect at the time, applied to persons who were fully qualified when last separated. However, reenlistment was not authorized at the time of separation under the enlisted year group management plan. For soldiers separated on or after 1 October 1968 this code reflects that separation was the result of an early release program and the soldier was fully qualified to reenlist but chose not to.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990 shows that he served in primary MOS 11C for 1 year and 9 months.

2. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he served in MOS 11C for 2 years and 9 months. However, evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded primary MOS 11C on 29 December 1987 and that he served in primary MOS 11C for 2 years and 8 months. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 11 (Primary Specialty) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990 to show that he served in primary MOS 11C for 2 years and 8 months.

3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990 shows his date of birth as 15 November 1986. However, the applicant’s Birth Certificate shows that he was born on 25 January 1969. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s date of birth to show 25 January 1969 on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990.

4. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that his RE code is incorrect on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990 and should be corrected to show RE-1A, instead of RE-2B. However, the governing regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation states that RE-1A applied to careerists with over 6 years of service for pay (over 4 years service for pay if separated on or after 15 August 1978). Evidence of record shows that the applicant had less than 3 years of service.

5. The RE code used in the applicant’s case is correct and was applied in accordance with the applicable regulations. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request to change his RE code to RE-1A.

6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

         a. by deleting the entry, “11C100000 INDRCT FIRE INFMN–1 YRS-9 MOS//NOTHING FOLLOWS” in item 11 (Primary Specialty) on the DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990 of the individual concerned;

         b. by adding the entry, “11C100000 INDRCT FIRE INFMN-2 YRS-8 MOS//NOTHING FOLLOWS” in item 11 on this DD Form 214;

         c. by deleting the entry, “861115” in item 5 (Date of Birth) on the DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 August 1990; and

         d. by adding the entry, “690125” in item 5 on this DD Form 214.
        
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

MHM___ KAN____ DPH_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Melvin H. Meyer________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067730
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020514
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0000
2. 100.0200
3. 100.0300
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020019

    Original file (20100020019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release from active duty shows in: * Item 12 (Record of Service) he completed 2 years, 10 months, and 29 days of net active service * Item 23 (Type of Separation) the entry "Release from Active Duty" * Item 25 (Separation Authority) the entry "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4" * Item 26 (Separation Code) the entry "LBK" * Item 27 (Reentry [RE] Code) the entry "NA" 6. Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, in effect at the time, stated a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005116

    Original file (20140005116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 documenting this period of service shows he was awarded MOS 11C1P and held this MOS for 2 years and 8 months. A DD Form 214 shows he served on active duty from 10 to 14 June 1991. Although the record shows he held PMOS 11C1P when he was ordered to active duty on 16 June 1991, it appears he was awarded MOS 75B1O during this period of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020155

    Original file (20090020155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 2 March 1992 was specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant contends that the rank of PFC (E-3) and RE Code of "RE-3C" shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he held the rank of SPC (E-4) at the time of his voluntary separation under the 1990 Early Transition Program and he should not be penalized with the RE code that he was issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was reduced in rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007097

    Original file (20140007097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this application: a. he requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214, ending on 11 May 2001, item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) to show he entered Active Duty For Special Work (ADSW) before 15 August 2000; and b. as a new issue, he requests correction of his DD Form 214, also ending on 11 May 2001 (and the previous DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to: * show his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) as 18 April 2000 vice 18 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029430

    Original file (20100029430.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states that for military education entries in item 14 to list in-service training courses by title, number of weeks, and the year successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214. Therefore, he did not complete a qualifying period of service for the Kuwait Liberation Medal and is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018334

    Original file (20110018334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also states: * he was barred from reenlisting after serving in the U.S. Navy (USN) from May 1980 to May 1984 * he served in the Navy Reserve (USNR) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from May 1984 to October 1986 * he accepted reduction of two pay grades to cross over to the U.S. Army * the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) specifically states he is entitled to a medical review board * he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012879

    Original file (20110012879.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: a. He submitted a DA Form 4187, dated 8 November 1991, which shows his grade as CPL and his MOS as 63T1O. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as CPL at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000994

    Original file (20140000994 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), dated 25 May 1990, shows his company commander recommended he be barred from reenlistment. If, however, the Soldier had a local bar to reenlistment and had less than 18 years of service, the Soldier was to be assigned RE code "3." _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000994

    Original file (20140000994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), dated 25 May 1990, shows his company commander recommended he be barred from reenlistment. If, however, the Soldier had a local bar to reenlistment and had less than 18 years of service, the Soldier was to be assigned RE code "3." _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002966

    Original file (20090002966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show a second award of the National Defense Service Medal, along with any other authorized awards based on his military service. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), along with two DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 22 October 1982 and 1 February 2005, show he entered active duty this period on 30 September 1974 and was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation...