Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067641C070402
Original file (2002067641C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 14 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067641

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his discharge should be upgraded because he was an alcoholic and was not helped in any form. He has now gone 20 years without drinking and desires to have his discharge upgraded.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in Cleveland, Ohio on 5 September 1958 for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed his basic combat training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina on 25 November 1958. He was advanced to the rank of private first class on 8 May 1959.

He was convicted by a summary court-martial on 6 July 1960 of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 20 June to 26 June 1960. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of pay and restriction.

He was convicted by a summary court-martial on 18 October 1960 of being AWOL from 5 October to 12 October 1960. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of pay and restriction.

On 13 February 1961, he was again convicted by a summary court-martial of being AWOL from 23 January to 25 January 1961. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days and a forfeiture of pay.

The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214), which is signed by the applicant and shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 28 March 1961, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness, based on his involvement in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. He had served 2 years, 5 months and 6 days of total active service and had 48 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.

There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.

Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel by reason of unfitness for those individuals involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no violations or procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

3. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate, considering all of the available facts of the case.

4. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, given his otherwise undistinguished record of service, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__dh____ ___kan __ __mhm__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067641
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/05/14
TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1961/03/28
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR635-208
DISCHARGE REASON UNFIT
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 583 144.5000/A51.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017762

    Original file (20070017762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 February 1961, the applicant’s unit commander initiated separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. He had completed 2 years, 7 months, and 28 days of creditable active service, and had 206 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. There is no evidence of record, nor has the applicant provided sufficient evidence to support upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081500C070215

    Original file (2002081500C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079621C070215

    Original file (2002079621C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 29 March 1961, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation to discharge the applicant with a UD. The record does not support, and the applicant has not presented any evidence that he was told that his discharge would automatically be upgraded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089227C070403

    Original file (2003089227C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 November 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade to honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014635

    Original file (20080014635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. There is no evidence which shows that the applicant's discharge proceedings were not in compliance with the applicable regulation in effect at the time. _________XXX______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015216

    Original file (20140015216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows: * he was issued a DD Form 258A (Undesirable Discharge Certificate) * he completed 1 year, 5 months, and 16 days of service, of which 11 months and 21 days was foreign service * he had 323 days of time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972 9. b. Paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, his record contains a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 21 September 1961 under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063818C070421

    Original file (2001063818C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The separation authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007316C070208

    Original file (20040007316C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was 17 when he enlisted into the service and had a hard time leaving his father. On 12 January 1961, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge due to unfitness and directed the applicant be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant also accepted one NJP, was convicted by both a summary and special court-martial, was barred from reenlistment and was given a rehabilitative transfer after his release from confinement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010981

    Original file (20140010981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his record contains a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 22 November 1961 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 by reason of unfitness with a character of service as under other than honorable conditions. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010981 3 ARMY BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081197C070215

    Original file (2002081197C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In support of his application he submits a statement from a psychiatrist and a letter from his sister. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: