Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067601C070402
Original file (2002067601C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067601

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member
Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Remission of a $6,082.64 debt for two household goods (HHG) shipments in excess of the allowable weight.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that no one even suggested that his June 1999 HHG shipment might be over the weight allowance until it was all packed and there was no time to do anything about it. He has four children, three teenage daughters (one in college) and a 10-year-old son. They are living in a high cost area and he is near retirement. Having to repay this money will be a severe financial hardship. He submits letters of support from his chain of command.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant, a staff sergeant with approximately 121/2 years of continuous active duty (in June 1999), had undergone at least three previous permanent change of station (PCS) household moves prior to the relocation of his family to Belgium in June 1996.

Available records show that, in April 2000, the applicant was informed of a $12,165.28 indebtedness for overweight HHG shipments. $1,768.13 of this resulted from his PCS move to Belgium in June 1996 and $10,397.15 of it was from his PCS move from Belgium to Fort Carson, Colorado in June 1999.

With command support, the applicant applied for remission or cancellation of the debt. The Total Army Personnel Command, Special Actions Branch determined that half the amount, $6,082.64, should be remitted or cancelled “on a basis of injustice or hardship.” The applicant was advised to apply to this Board if he felt that an injustice had occurred.

Joint Federal Travel Regulations, chapter 5 provides the guidance for PCS travel including the weight limits and applicable rules for the shipment of HHG.

Paragraph U2010 of those regulations provides that "a member is expected to exercise the same care and regard for expenses incurred as a prudent person would person when traveling at personal expense."

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant had undergone previous PCS moves, therefore the general rules and regulations applicable to the process were not new to him. He had a regulatory and a personal financial obligation to pay attention to his weight limit and to the weight of his HHG shipment when he moved his family to Belgium. Therefore, even if he was not notified of the amount due for that first overweight shipment, he knew or should have known. that if they acquired any additional HHG, the return shipment would be even more over allowance.

2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_RVO___ __RTD___ __KWL _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067601
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020725
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011717

    Original file (20150011717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests remission of his indebtedness to the government in the amount of $2,448.49 for shipment of excess household goods (HHGs). The commander stated the applicant was the sole provider for his wife and two children, and as such, the debt incurred during his PCS move proved to be an overwhelming burden. The applicant submitted a DA Form 3508 to the Fort Bragg Finance Office that shows he was requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness based on hardship.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02107

    Original file (BC-2011-02107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant questioned the TMO regarding exceeding his weight allowance since his previous PCS shipment was not in excess of the allowance, as he had not received a notification of excess cost for the move. The applicant was informed that he may have exceeded his HHGs weight allowance and could have requested the shipment be reweighed at that time. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we are persuaded the failure to timely notify the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082281C070215

    Original file (2002082281C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : That the HHG weight allowance for a career enlisted soldier serving in the rank of sergeant major (SGM) is unjustly low when compared to that of a junior grade officer. In June 2002, the applicant submitted a request to have his debt remitted or cancelled.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-061

    Original file (2005-061.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argued that having to pay more than $6,000 above what he expected to pay for the overage because of misinformation he received from the Transportation Office is a sig- nificant injustice given that he “used an authorized government supported web site to calculate my overage cost as directed by a government expert.” APPLICABLE LAW Article 11.F. § 461, the Secretary may remit or cancel the debt of an enlisted member to the United States “when recovery would be against equity and good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013683

    Original file (20080013683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director further recommends the Board direct the DFAS documentation for excess weight for the transportation of HHG for the applicant under the applicable Bill of Lading include the authorized weight allowance of her husband. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant’s husband submitted two requests for extension of his HHG shipment entitlements, by reason of his spouse’s (the applicant) assignment at Fort Hood. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015501

    Original file (20110015501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he was authorized shipment of 25,270 pounds of household goods in connection with his permanent duty station move in 2006. The applicant provides a memorandum dated 13 June 2010, wherein the Chief, Operations Management Division, HRC, states: a. that the applicant submitted a request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness; b. that the request was approved in a partial amount of $7,565.31; c. that it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328

    Original file (20120006328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022030

    Original file (20120022030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 18 October 2012, after the applicant submitted a re-weight memorandum for record, officials at the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 and G-4, reviewed the applicant's request to waive the indebtedness resulting from exceeding his prescribed weight allowance. The documents provided by the applicant regarding his request for an increased HHG weight allowance during his PCS family move from Fort Wainwright, Alaska to Germany were reviewed. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002777

    Original file (0002777.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, at the time of his PCS the member’s weight allowance for the shipping of HHGs was 4,225 pounds, plus 1,100 pounds of UB. There has been no evidence submitted to show that he informed the destination site that his shipment exceeded the weight allowed for the shipping of his HHGs, nor did he request to have his shipment reweighed. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008384

    Original file (20120008384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests cancellation of indebtedness that resulted from exceeding his authorized weight allowance for the shipment of his household goods (HHG) from Fort Lewis, WA to Fort Hood, TX. The applicant provides: * Orders 278-06E, issued by Area Support Group – Kuwait, dated 4 October 2008 * DD Form 1299 (Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property) * memorandum from the applicant, dated 11 September 2009 * e-mail traffic from Ms. Bxxxxxx Qxxxxxx, dated 8 October...