Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067298C070402
Original file (2002067298C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 11 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002067298

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Ted S. Kanamine Chairperson
Mr. John T. Meixell Member
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be paid back the severance pay that has been recouped from him.

APPLICANT STATES: That although he was told he would be given severance pay if he agreed to transfer to the Inactive (sic) Ready Reserve (IRR), he was later told that he was paid severance pay in error. That resulted in the collection of his severance pay, even though he consented to be assigned to the IRR as a condition for receiving the severance pay.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records could not be located. The following information was derived from documents supplied by the applicant, himself.

He enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 19 July 1994, and in the Regular Army on 26 June 1995. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of power generator equipment repairer, and was promoted to pay grade E-4. He was honorably released from active duty on 8 February 2001 by reason of weight control failure. He had 5 years, 7 months and 13 days of active service. Both the applicant’s DD Form 214 and the orders discharging him stated that he was entitled to half involuntary separation pay.

On 26 December 2001, the Department of Defense Finance and Accounting Office (DFAS) notified the applicant that he was erroneously given separation pay because he did not have 6 years of active duty.

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 1-36, states that it is mandatory to transfer soldiers to the IRR who are separated for failure to meet Army weight control standards.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1174, provides that a regular enlisted member of an armed force who is discharged involuntarily or as the result of the denial of the reenlistment of the member and who has completed six or more, but less than 20, years of active service immediately before that discharge is entitled to separation pay computed under subsection (d) unless the Secretary concerned determines that the conditions under which the member is discharged do not warrant payment of such pay.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was not entitled to involuntary separation pay because he did not have 6 years of active duty.

2. It would appear that the error was made when someone processing the applicant’s separation mistook his enlistment into the DEP as his enlistment into the Regular Army.

3. While an error was made, the only adverse affect on the applicant is the requirement for him to pay back his separation pay. His assignment to the IRR is not an issue in this case. Since the applicant was on his initial enlistment, his statutory 8-year military service obligation does not expire until 26 June 2003. Therefore, by regulation he was required to be transferred to the IRR regardless of whether he received separation pay or not.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jtm___ ___tsk___ ___hbo__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002067298
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020711
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015799C070206

    Original file (20050015799C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order for the applicant to remain eligible for the VSI payments, he had to reenlist in the Ready Reserve. The applicant was eventually told by HRC that they could no longer authorize an antedated reenlistment for him since it had been several years since his discharge. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059826C070421

    Original file (2001059826C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 October a physician indicated on a record of medical care form that the applicant “needs ING for year and then re-evaluate” and that he (the physician) supported that his (the applicant’s) “condition is progressive.” The Patient Administrator, for the NYARNG, prepared a memorandum indicating that the applicant, and several other members of the National Guard, had “medical conditions that prohibit them from active participation in National Guard activities” and requested that those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065132C070421

    Original file (2001065132C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 May 2000, the applicant was reassigned from the IRR to the 250 th Transportation Company and the unit initiated a request for reinstatement of his enlistment bonus payment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant has had two enlistment contracts and received assistance from his USAR unit commanders, as well as legal and congressional assistance. He again transferred to the IRR on 20 April 2001, and was reassigned to a unit on 22 May 2002, all within a period of 1 year, 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005850C070208

    Original file (20040005850C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant was separated from active duty on 30 June 1998 under the VSI program and was to receive $7663.59 a year for 26 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. reenlisting him for an eight-year term of service in the Army Reserve, with an antedated effective date of 1 July 1998; b. providing him VSI payments from 2000 through 2005; c. by restoring his entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082324C070215

    Original file (2002082324C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the US Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group, Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), be corrected to transfer to the Retired Reserve. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve. 14-R, Volume 7A, Chapter 35 “Separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069581C070402

    Original file (2002069581C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Authorization to antedate a reenlistment to 20 September 1995. The applicant, by her own admission, was told when she was separated from active duty that she had to remain a member of the IRR to receive VSI payments. The applicant was told in 1996 that she had been discharged and needed to request an antedated reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057759C070420

    Original file (2001057759C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he should have received a complete physical examination before being discharged from the Army Reserves. The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 6 years on 16 May 1977. The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 3 years on 22 August 1992.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055223C070420

    Original file (2001055223C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 June 2001 the applicant submitted a rebuttal to the advisory opinion, stating that she did meet all the requirements for early Reserve retirement, except for being a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of her reassignment to the Retired Reserve. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: The applicant had not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04099903C070208

    Original file (04099903C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 February 2000 the Army Reserve Command published orders reassigning the applicant from the 244th to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) because she was an unsatisfactory participant [with the 244th]. In the instance of a Soldier who served in the Regular Army for 3 years, the remaining obligation may be satisfied by assignment to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement). There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to show that her involuntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086554C070212

    Original file (2003086554C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to indicate that he declined involuntary separation pay. Block 18 on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entries: "SEPARATION PAY - -$24986.88" and "MEMBER IS ENTITLED TO HALF INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY." There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant received half involuntary separation pay in the amount of $24,986.88.