Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be promoted to the rank and pay grade of specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4) and be provided all associated benefits.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that while serving in the Army, he was unjustly not considered for promotion to SPC/E-4 after he became eligible. As a result, he was denied benefits when he was discharged by reason of physical disability. He claims that despite being eligible for promotion, and the fact that his record of service suggests that he was deserving of promotion, there is no evidence in his record to show, he was ever considered for promotion to SPC/E-4. In support of his application, he provides a copy of a page from a previous Board decisional document that contains his statement that he was deceived into believing that his failure of his Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) disqualified him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM); a copy of a memorandum from his unit commander, dated 24 March 1992, that certifies that he was not pending elimination from the service under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); copies of award certificates for the AGCM and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); and a letter of commendation, dated 24 July 1989, that congratulates him for being a distinguished graduate from the United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, Georgia.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 2 March 1989, he entered active duty in the Regular Army and he served for
3 years, 4 months, and 27 days until 28 July 1992, at which time he was honorably separated, by reason of physical disability with severance pay.
The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) confirms, in Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to PFC/E-3 on
1 March 1990, and that this was the highest rank and pay grade he attained and held while serving on active duty.
The applicant’ Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that suggest he was ever recommended for, selected for, or promoted to a rank and pay grade above PFC/E-3 while serving on active duty. There is also no indication or personnel action form on file that would indicate he was recommended for promotion to SPC/E-4 by his unit commander.
The record does confirm that the applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident in September 1989, and that subsequently he underwent processing under the Physical Disability System to determine his eligibility for continued service in his rank and military occupational specialty (MOS). This medical processing was based on the following diagnosed medical conditions: a diagnosed familial essential tremor-severe, that existed prior to his entry into service; and common migraine headaches - moderate to severe, that originated in September 1989.
The record also shows that a suspension of favorable personnel actions (FLAG) was initiated on the applicant on 20 November 1991, based on his failure of the APFT. It further verifies that in March 1992, he was not working in his MOS due to his physical profile limitations. The FLAG action remained in effect until
1 April 1992.
The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that he held the rank and pay grade of PFC/E-3 on the date of his discharge. This document also shows that the applicant earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: ARCOM; National Defense Service Medal; Army Service Ribbon; Marksman Marksmanship Badge (Rifle); Army Superior Unit Award; Army Lapel Button; Southwest Asia Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars; and the Kuwait Liberation Medal. In addition, as a result of action by this Board, a correction to his separation document
(DD Form 215), dated 13 September 2001, was issued that added the AGCM to the list of authorized awards listed in his separation document.
Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) prescribes the Army’s enlisted promotion policy. Paragraph 1-10 contains guidance on placing members in a non-promotable status. It specifies, in pertinent part, that a soldier is in a non-promotable status when under a Flag action or when undergoing a medical proceeding to determine their ability to perform in their MOS. The regulation further confirms that the criteria for promotion to SPC/E-4 without waiver is 26 months time in service and 6 months time in grade.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he was unjustly denied consideration for promotion to SPC/E-4 and he should be promoted to this rank and pay grade based on his record of service. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. Although specific dates are not available, the evidence of record confirms that the applicant underwent processing under the physical disability system based on two medically diagnosed conditions. One condition that existed prior to his entering the Army, and the second one that originated in September 1989. Additionally, he was under a Flag action from November 1991 through April 1992, based on his failure to pass the APFT. Both these factors would have placed him in a non-promotable status.
3. Notwithstanding the fact that there is no evidence to confirm that the applicant’s unit commander formally considered him for promotion to SPC/E-4 or that formal action was taken to deny the applicant’s promotion upon his becoming eligible, in the opinion of the Board, there is sufficient evidence to conclude the applicant was in a non-promotable status based on his undergoing medical proceedings to determine his fitness for service in his MOS and based on his being under an imposed Flag action. Therefore, there is no error or injustice related to his promotion consideration or non-selection for promotion to SPC/E-4, and it concludes there is insufficient evidence to justify the requested relief.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FNE__ __BJE__ __REB___ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002067243 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/18 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1992/07/28 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 |
DISCHARGE REASON | Physical Disability with severance pay |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 310 | 131.0000 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015492
She could not pass the APFT and never had. In order to be eligible for promotion to SGT, a Soldier must have a passing APFT score among other requirements and any previously-initiated flag must have been lifted from his or her record. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013294
There is no evidence to show the applicant was recommended for promotion to SPC/E-4 during his period of service. e. If a unit commander elects not to recommend a Soldier for promotion on the automatic promotion date, then a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) denying the promotion will be submitted not later than the 20th day of the month preceding the month of automatic promotion. The applicable regulation states that promotion to SPC is automatic with 24 months TIS provided the Soldier is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015310
It indicates the applicant was still assigned as an AIT Soldier and was not MOS qualified due to not having taken the APFT for medical profile reasons. It states Soldiers pending referral to an MMRB, MEBD, or PEB will not be denied promotion if already promotable on the basis of medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion. The evidence fails to show the applicant's medical processing was the sole basis for being denied promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019074
However, his records show he did not complete 55D MOS training and was reassigned to Fort Bliss, TX, where he completed training for MOS 14J (Early Warning System Operator). When the commander denies promotion, he or she may promote the Soldier on the next automated Enlisted Advancement Report, provided the Soldier is otherwise qualified. By regulation, he should have been automatically advanced to PV2 six months after his entry on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002340
The applicant states that he was eligible for automatic promotion in September 2008; however, because he was in the Army overweight program from January 2008 to August 2008, his promotion was flagged. Paragraph 3-17 of Army Regulation 600-8-19 states, in pertinent part, that each month, Active Army Soldiers in all MOSs who have 46 months TIS (to become eligible for promotion at 48 months), 10 months TIG (to become eligible for promotion at 12 months), are otherwise not ineligible in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021246
The applicant requests: a. correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show/add: * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * her date of rank (DOR) to SPC of 27 September 2013 * her net active service as 3 years, 6 months, and 21 days vice 3 years, 5 months, and 10 days * the Army Achievement Medal b. correction of her separation orders and discharge certificate to show her rank as SPC. The applicant provides: *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003683
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003683 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of the previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision in Docket Number AR20140009146 on 22 October 2014. While the evidence he provides does show he attended a promotion board and was on a promotion list, it still doesn't conclusively show he remained eligible on the date he contends he should have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992
The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008772C070208
Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his rank as private first class (PFC) and to show the award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered active duty on 11 January 2001 and was promoted to PV2 on 11...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003542
The applicant also states his medical retirement with a 30% disability rating was only based on his condition of asthma. His record contains a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 13 April 2005, that shows his medical conditions at the time as: Asthma and Chronic left knee pain. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence that shows he appeared before a promotion board for consideration to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service or...