Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066971C070402
Original file (2002066971C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066971

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Judy Blanchard-Miller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Ms. Melinda M. Darby Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded.

APPLICANT STATES: No contentions submitted.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military record show.

On 28 August 1974, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B10 (Field Artillery Crewman).

Between November 1974 and December 1975, the applicant accepted twelve nonjudicial punishments (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for eight occasions of failure to repair, for four occasions of breaking restrictions, for four occasions of being absent without leave from 17 to 18 March 1975, from 30 June to 1 July 1975, from 18 to 19 August 1975 and from 24 to 28 October 1975, for two occasions of dereliction of duty and for disobeying a lawful order. His punishments included forfeitures, restrictions, extra duties and a reduction to pay grade E-1.

The applicant’s record indicated that he was barred from reenlistment. The applicant’s bar was based on frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities.

On 19 December 1975, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation.

The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's discharge are not on file. The Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged on 19 December 1975, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 for unfitness with an undesirable discharge. He had completed 1 year, 3 months and 17 days of creditable active service and had no lost time.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13 contains the policy and outlines the procedures for separating individuals for misconduct, and provides, in pertinent part, that individuals involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities were subject to separation for misconduct.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s discharge proceedings are missing from his file. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

3. Although the discharge proceedings are missing from his file. It was determined that the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering the applicant's numerous acts of indiscipline, it does not appear that his UD was too severe.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__inw___ __mmd___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066971
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020416
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (UD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19751212
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR635-200, chapter 13 . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON A60.00
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 144.6000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065634C070421

    Original file (2001065634C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The record also contains a copy of a Report of Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions (DA Form 268), dated 5 December 1974, which confirms that on that date the applicant was pending separation processing under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069648C070402

    Original file (2002069648C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075118C070403

    Original file (2002075118C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 2 November 1972, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 6 June 1977, for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087942C070212

    Original file (2003087942C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 July 1975, the separation authority approved separation with a UD. He had completed 1 year, 2 months and 8 days of active military service. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2003087942SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20031104TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UD)DATE OF DISCHARGE19750724DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200, Chap 13DISCHARGE REASONA51.00BOARD DECISION(DENY)REVIEW AUTHORITYISSUES 1.144.50002.3.4.5.6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080332C070215

    Original file (2002080332C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 26 January 1976, the applicant's commander advised the applicant of his rights and preferred charges against him for the AWOL offense. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006950C070205

    Original file (20060006950C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 June 1977, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an honorable discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant’s record of service included a bar to reenlistment, one special court-martial conviction, and 128 days of lost time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004340C070206

    Original file (20050004340C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Code) in effect, at the time showed the SPD Code "JLB", indicated a discharge for unfitness based on frequent incident involvement of a discreditable nature with authorities, on the provisions of paragraph 13-5a (1) of Army Regulation 635-200. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided for discharge of enlisted personnel. The applicant's service records show seven nonjudicial punishments...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085065C070212

    Original file (2003085065C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: The Board notes that the applicant was convicted by one special court-martial and was punished four times under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088672C070403

    Original file (2003088672C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 23 June 1976, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be furnished an undesirable discharge. The Board reviewed the applicant's record of service which included four nonjudicial punishments, one civil conviction for Grand Larceny and 23 days of lost time and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001269C070206

    Original file (20050001269C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice to this Board expired on 6 December 1984. _________James C. Hise__________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20050001269 SUFFIX RECON YYYYMMDD DATE BOARDED 20050920 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD DATE OF DISCHARGE 19750305 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, chapter 13-5a(1) DISCHARGE REASON BOARD...