| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the PH based on his suffering a concussion and perforation of his left tympanic membrane while serving during combat in Korea. In support of his application, he submits a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability rating decision, dated 8 July 2000, his separation document (DD Form 214), and a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate.
4. The applicant's military records show that he served on active duty for 5 years and 1 day, from 11 May 1948 through 11 May 1953, at which time he was honorably discharged in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC).
5. The applicant’s Service Record (DA Form 24) confirms that the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was SFC and that he trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 1812 (Light Weapons Infantryman). The DA Form 24 also shows that the applicant served in Korea from 19 September 1950 through 7 July 1951, and that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: United Nations Service Medal; Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp; Combat Infantryman Badge; Korean Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars; and Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation.
6. However, Section 8 (Wounds Received Through Enemy Action) of the
DA Form 24 is blank, which would indicate that the applicant was not wounded in action during the period of active duty covered by the Service Record. In addition, there are no orders or other documents contained in the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) that give any indication that he was wounded in action during his service in Korea or that he was entitled to or awarded the PH.
7. In addition, the applicant’s Service Record and MPRJ contain no derogatory information and there is no indication that he was ever disqualified from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) by any of the unit commanders for which he served during his tenure on active duty.
8. A Report of Medical Examination (SF 88) on file documents the separation physical examination the applicant took on 9 May 1953. This form does indicate that the applicant suffered a right ear drum perforation; however, it does not indicate when and where he suffered this injury.
9. On 11 May 1953, the applicant was honorably discharged after completing a total of 5 years and 1 day of active military service. He was issued and authenticated a DD Form 214 on the date of his separation. This separation document confirms that he earned the awards listed in his Service Record. However, it does not list the PH as an authorized award nor does it give any indication that he was ever wounded in action.
10. A VA rating decision letter, dated 8 July 2001, issued by the VA Regional Office, Jackson, Mississippi, awarded the applicant a service connected disability for a perforation, left tympanic membrane, healed, with hearing loss. This document does indicate that the applicant incurred this injury during combat in Korea.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member wounded or killed while engaged in action against an armed enemy or hostile force.
12. Paragraph 2-8b defines a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent while engaged in action against the enemy. It also specifically states that in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record. Paragraph 2-8b (4) provides examples of enemy related injuries that clearly justify award of the PH and
sub-paragraph (b) contains the specific example “concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions.”
13. Chapter 4 provides guidance on awarding the AGCM and it states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The normal qualifying period is 3 years; however, in the case of the first award, the qualifying period is 1 or more years when it is awarded at the termination of a period of Federal military service. There is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM; however, disqualification must be justified.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Notwithstanding the contention of the applicant, after carefully examining the evidence of record and the independent evidence submitted by the applicant, the Board finds an insufficient evidentiary basis on which to support awarding the PH.
2. The evidence of record verifies that the applicant’s suffered a ear drum perforation, however, it does not provide confirmation that this injury was received as a result of action against the enemy. In the opinion of the Board, since the applicant was treated for this injury by military medical personnel, had there been sufficient medical evidence to support his receiving the PH, it would have been recommended at the time of his treatment. Thus, while the Board wishes to commend the applicant on his exemplary service in defense of his country, it is compelled to deny the requested PH.
3. Lacking any derogatory information on file in the applicant’s record or a specific disqualifying action from any of his unit commanders, the Board concludes the applicant served a qualifying period of honorable service that entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be appropriate to add this award to his records at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for his honorable service from 11 May 1948 to 11 May 1953; and by providing him a corrected separation document that includes these awards.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__RVO__ __RJW__ __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR20021066914 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/09 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (Partial Relief ) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016156
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for a concussion injury caused by an enemy-generated explosion in the Republic of Vietnam. His service medical records were not available for review. According to the Report of Medical Examination and Report of Medical History provided by the applicant, he had a tympanic membrane graft (right ear) due to a perforated tympanic membrane in April 1965 and December 1971 at Fort Hood, TX, and Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016808C070206
During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record showing that the applicant was ever wounded in action, or treated for a combat related wound or injury by military medical personnel. However, by regulation in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. Item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action while serving...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019067
In the original consideration of his case that occurred on 24 February 2000, the applicant submitted a medical statement indicating he had sustained an ear injury in October 1968 and in July 1999, officials from the Army's Personnel Command informed him that he was not authorized an award of the Purple Heart because his injury was considered accidental. Creditable witness statements indicate he received injuries from an enemy act (being blown off an APC due to a landmine explosion). As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011848
On 15 April 2013, his request was denied based on the medical documentation provided by the applicant that indicated his follow up examination for subjective hearing loss and tympanic membrane perforation following exposure to an IED attack was normal and without limitations. The fact that the applicant sustained a perforated eardrum while serving in Iraq is not disputed; however, the evidence provided by the applicant shows that on 1 December 2005, he sought treatment for ear pain and that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013237
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the member was wounded as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must not only be evidence that the member was wounded as a result of enemy action, there must also be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004623
The second page of a DD Form 2844 (Medical Record - Post-Deployment Medical Assessment) shows the applicant had retained shrapnel in his left hand. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant's service medical records show that the applicant received treatment for a right tympanic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017356
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. It states that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002451
A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends his medical record should be corrected to delete the reference to "old injury" and he should be awarded the Purple Heart because he was wounded while serving in the RVN when he sustained a perforated tympanic membrane of his right ear from a loud explosion. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006522
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 214) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Korea. The applicant states that the letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 13 February 2006, proves that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015181
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) * DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition Physical Profile) * DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) * General orders and certificate for the Army Commendation Medal * Certificate and citation for award of the Bronze Star Medal CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His service record does not contain any orders which show he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the...