| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was injured in action on 26 March 1968, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He states that his jeep overturned when his convoy was ambushed. This resulted in his receiving lacerations to his head and eyebrow that required suturing. He claims that he received medical treatment for this wound on 26 March 1968, and in support of his application, he provides a copy of a Chronological Record of Medical Care (SF Form 600).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 11 April 1967 and that he served for 3 years, 9 months, and 25 days until being honorably separated on 5 February 1971.
5. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms that he served in the RVN for 19 months, from 20 September 1967 through 6 May 1969 and that he participated in 6 campaigns. During his tenure in the RVN, he served with the following units for the periods indicated: Company C, 1st Battalion,
8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, from 25 September through 2 October 1967; Company B, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, from 3 October 1967 through 2 March 1968; and Company D, 51st Infantry Regiment, from 3 March 1968 through 4 May 1969.
6. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 verifies that the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant/E-5, which he was promoted to on 25 September 1969. Item 40 (Wounds) contains no entry, which would indicate that he was not wounded in action during his active duty tenure.
7. The separation document issued to the applicant upon his separation from active duty on 5 February 1971, confirms that during his active duty tenure he received the following awards: National Defense Service Medal; Combat Infantryman Badge; Vietnam Service Medal; RVN Campaign Medal; Meritorious Unit Citation; Army Good Conduct Medal; and the Marksman Marksmanship Badge (Rifle). The PH is not included in the list of authorized awards contained in the DD Form 214.
8. In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of a Chronological Record of Medical Care (SF 600), which confirms that on 26 March 1968, he was involved in an automobile accident in which his jeep overturned. This resulted in his receiving lacerations to his head and right upper eyelid. The treatment record gives no indication that this accident was the result of enemy action.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army’s awards policy. Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on awarding the Purple Heart. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized to members who are wounded in action. A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained in action. The wound for which a PH is being awarded must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the records of medical treatment for the wound or injury for which the PH is being awarded must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign in which a member participated and that a silver service star is used in lieu of 5 bronze service stars. Paragraph 9-27 contains guidance the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, which was awarded by the Vietnamese government to all units that served in the RVN between 8 February 1962 and 28 March 1973, and was authorized by General Order Number 8, dated 10 March 1974, which entitled all personnel who served in those units during the period indicated to this award.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the PH, but it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim. While the applicant has provided a copy of a medical treatment record that confirms that he was injured in an automobile accident while serving in the RVN, this document does not verify that this injury was the result of enemy action. Therefore, the Board is compelled to deny the requested relief.
2. During the processing of this case, the Board discovered that based on his service in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star with his Vietnam Service Medal, to denote his participation in
6 campaigns in the RVN; and to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record at this time.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned is entitled to 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star with his Vietnam Service Medal and to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and by providing him a corrected separation document that reflects these awards.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
FNE BJE REB GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066880 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/18 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1971/02/05 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Overseas Returnee |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PARTIAL |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 46 | 107.0000 |
| 2. 61 | 107.0015 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009917C070208
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart and correction of his separation document (DD Form 214) to show the Soldier’s Medal. The regulation provides that, although multiple awards of this unit citation are not authorized for wear, official military and historical records will indicate all awards received.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010567C071029
The applicant states, in effect, he received a PH for being wounded in action in January 1968, which is included in his record and on his separation document (DD Form 214), but did not receive a second PH for an incident that occurred on 19 September 1967, when he was flying a helicopter gunship in the An Loc valley in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010066
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007943
Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 11 February 1968 through 9 February 1969; and again from 5 October 1970 through 4 October 1971. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his 4 October 1971 DD Form 214 by adding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001051
Therefore, absent any evidence of record or independent documentary evidence provided by the applicant confirming his entitlement to the PH with 1st OLC, it would be appropriate to award him the PH and correct his record and separation document at this time to show his entitlement to this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the PH for wounds received in action on 11 March 1968; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091150C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. These orders confirm that the applicant was awarded the PH, for being wounded in action on 9 September 1967. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231
Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007129C070206
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice related to the grade entered on his DD Form 214 and award of the PH now under consideration on 13 July 1968, the date of his separation from active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017321C071029
The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058621C070421
The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show he was awarded the PH and other combat medals he earned during his active duty tenure. The Board did find that the evidence of record sufficiently documents the applicant’s participation in combat as an infantryman, assigned to an infantry unit, who had been involved in combat operations during his assignment tenure in the RVN. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...