| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his rank as a sergeant (SGT), instead of specialist four (SP4).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to the rank of SGT on 14 October 1971. However, at the time of separation he was separated in the rank of SP4. In support of his application he provides a copy of his promotion orders.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in St. Louis, Missouri on 27 May 1970. He successfully completed his training as a light weapons infantryman and was transferred to Vietnam on 25 November 1970. He was assigned as a rifleman to Company A, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment and was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 11 April 1971.
5. While in Vietnam he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with “V” device, the Air Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the National Defense Service Medal. He attained promotion list standing to the pay grade of E-5 on 22 August 1971.
6. He departed Vietnam on 25 September 1971 en route to Fort Carson, Colorado. On 14 October 1971, orders were published in Vietnam which promoted him to the rank of SGT effective the same day. He reported to Fort Carson on 2 November 1971 and remained there until he was honorably discharged on 23 December 1971, in the rank of SP4. It should be noted that at the time he underwent his medical and physical examination for separation, all of the documents indicate that he was a SGT. There are no copies of his orders contained in his records. His records also contain no derogatory or disciplinary data and all of his conduct and efficiency ratings were deemed as excellent.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the AGCM. It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. In order to disqualify a member for the AGCM, the commander must notify the individual in writing of the basis for the disqualification and be afforded to present matters in their own behalf.
8. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/palm) Unit Citation for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned to the unit.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant clearly was promoted to the rank of SGT on 14 October 1971; however, through an administrative error, the promotion was never posted to his records. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to do so at this time.
2. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 27 May 1970 to 23 December 1971. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
3. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
4. The Board also determined that the applicant is entitled to be awarded the RVNGC w/palm Unit Citation. Although this award was authorized subsequent to the applicant’s separation from active duty, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include this award at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to the rank of SGT on 14 October 1971, and by awarding him the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation and the AGCM for the period 27 May 1970 to 23 December 1971 while serving in the rank of SGT.
BOARD VOTE:
___teo __ __hof ___ ___ao___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Arthur A. Omartian____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066756 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/corr 214 |
| 2. 319 | 131.0900/adv grd |
| 3. 102 | 107.0056/gcm |
| 4. 140 | 107.0094/rvngc |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079803C070215
Accordingly, absent orders which show an effective date of promotion and a date of rank, the Board finds no basis to promote him at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 7 June 1968 to 3 March 1970. b. by correcting his records to show his awards of the Purple Heart, the BSM, three bronze service stars, the AGCM and the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212
Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077968C070215
The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam on 2 March 1971 and was evacuated to a hospital in Japan. Although the available records do not contain the typical documents required to show that an individual was wounded in combat and that his treatment was made a matter of record, the Board finds the available evidence contained in his records is sufficiently convincing to show that he in fact sustained multiple fragmentation wounds on 2 March 1971 and that he was evacuated to a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003233
The applicant requests his record be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation. The MPRJ is void of any documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009342
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) includes the following orders: * Headquarters, 3rd Brigade, 9th Infantry Division, Special Orders (SO) Number (#) 116, dated 26 April 1970, which announced his award of the CIB * Company B, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry, Unit Orders #28, dated 7 July 1971, which announced his appointment to the acting noncommissioned officer rank of SGT *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009342 (2)
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) includes the following orders: * Headquarters, 3rd Brigade, 9th Infantry Division, Special Orders (SO) Number (#) 116, dated 26 April 1970, which announced his award of the CIB * Company B, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry, Unit Orders #28, dated 7 July 1971, which announced his appointment to the acting noncommissioned officer rank of SGT *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013979
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his correct rank of E-5 and his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). His DD Form 214 also shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, National Defense Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 25 July...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082035C070215
His DD Form 214 indicates his rank as a SP4, with a date of rank (DOR) of 10 February 1969. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to reflect his rank as SGT at this time. Accordingly, he is entitled to be awarded those awards at this time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080830C070215
The applicant states that his two awards of the Air Medal and his award of the Purple Heart were not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation and that he has since lost his orders for those awards. However, the evidence of record does show that his unit was awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and that he is entitled to be awarded three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has...