Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066749C070402
Original file (2002066749C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 9 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066749

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to show that he was discharged in pay grade E-5.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, his DD Form 214 is in error and that he was an E-5 at the time of his release from active duty. He states that the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider the case, because he did not know that his DD Form 214 was in error until recently when he was applying for a home loan.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant entered active duty on 15 August 1978. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training with award of the military occupational specialty of 94B (Food Services Specialist). The applicant was promoted to Specialist Fourth Class (SP4) on 1 December 1980. This is the highest rank of record.

Although there is no documentation on a 6 August 1981 NJP, the applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DD Form 2-1) shows he was reduced from SP4 to PFC on 6 August 1981, with a second promotion to SP4 on 1 March 1982. There are no other documents in the record to confirm these promotions or the 1981 reduction.

On 19 July 1983, the applicant received non-judicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for two counts of failure to go to his place of duty, one count of failure to obey a lawful order, and one count of being incapacitated as a result of previous indulgence in intoxicating liquor. The punishment imposed included reduction to private first class (PFC) (E-3).

The applicant was discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance on 20 August 1983 in pay grade E-3.

Army Regulation 600-200, at` paragraph 7-13, then in effect, stated that advancement to pay grade E-4 was not mandatory. Commanders could, without constraint, advance service members who had completed 24 months time in service and 6 months time in grade.

The policies and procedures governing the imposition of nonjudicial punishment are set out in title 10, United States Code, section 815 (Article 15, UCMJ), and in Army Regulation 27-10, chapter 3.




DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no indication that the applicant ever attained the rank of sergeant pay grade (E-5).

2. The NJP, which reduced the applicant to E-3, was imposed in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies. The punishment imposed was not disproportionate to the offenses, and there is no evidence of any substantive violation of any of the applicant's rights.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO__ ___RJW_ __DPH__ DENY APPLICATION




         Carl W. S. Chun
         Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066749
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020409
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2. A93.07
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073144C070403

    Original file (2002073144C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He first enlisted in the Army in 1962, at the age of 20, and served on active duty honorably for nearly 3 years until 1965, at which time he received an early out to attend college. In October 1984, he was promoted to SSG/E-6 and served honorably in that rank and pay grade until 1988, at which time he had two misdemeanor incidents that resulted in his being reduced two ranks and pay grades. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant held the rank and pay grade of PFC/E-3 on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083247C070215

    Original file (2002083247C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) The applicant departed Vietnam on 23 March 1970 and was discharged upon arrival. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing on the 23 March 1970 DD Form 214 of the individual concerned that his rank was SP4, his Pay Grade was E-4 and his date of rank was 10 November 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009133C070208

    Original file (20040009133C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the administrative bar to reenlistment be removed from his records, and that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as E-3 or E-4 and award of the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant states that he was an above average Soldier and believes he is entitled to the Good Conduct Medal. The record clearly shows that the applicant was a substandard Soldier with six incidents of NJP and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077845C070215

    Original file (2002077845C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 15 August 1985, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP), for assaulting an NCO. On 20 August 2002, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) denied the applicant’s request to be advanced to the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on the Retired List.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079529C070215

    Original file (2002079529C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, 15 June 1984, confirms that he was honorably separated in the rank and pay grade of PFC/E-3 on that date. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was reduced to PFC/E-3, effective 11 October 1983.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000060

    Original file (20110000060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 August 1983, the applicant's commander initiated separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. However, good service achievements and recommendations alone are not sufficient to mitigate his indiscipline and unsatisfactory performance and are not a basis for upgrading a properly-issued discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016373C070206

    Original file (20050016373C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was separated from active duty in pay grade E-4. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show additional Expert Marksmanship Badges. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023248

    Original file (20110023248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record contains no evidence and the applicant has failed to provide independent evidence that shows he was ever recommended for or promoted to SP4/E-4 by proper authority while serving on active duty. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020370

    Original file (20110020370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records should show he had time for leave, was afforded the opportunity to reenlist, and he was up for promotion at the time of his discharge. However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under other than honorable conditions while in an AWOL status on 7 January 1982 in the rank of private (PV1)/E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-33b, by reason of misconduct for frequent incidents of a discreditable nature...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019900

    Original file (20110019900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 * award of the Noncommissioned Officer Professional (NCO) Development Ribbon with Numeral 2 2. His records contain a DA Form 3947 (Medical Board Proceedings), dated 2 June 1983. Evidence shows his record went before a grade determination board.