| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he served an additional 15 days of active duty.
APPLICANT STATES: That he needs to have served at least 24 continuous months of active duty to be eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical benefits. His commander advised him that if he got out he would have full VA medical care. He could have stayed the additional 15 days if he knew it would make a difference. He did not realize until he applied for VA medical benefits that he was not eligible. He provides no supporting evidence.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 June 1994.
On 8 August 1995, the applicant was enrolled in the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP). On 4 March 1996, his commander, in consultation with the rehabilitation team, determined the applicant was a rehabilitation failure.
On 6 May 1996, the commander recommended the applicant’s discharge from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure.
On 7 May 1996, the applicant was advised by counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him and its effects. He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf and requested military legal counsel.
The appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant be given an honorable discharge.
On 17 May 1996, the applicant’s commander requested a separation date of 28 May 1996 for the applicant. On 23 May 1996, his commander requested a separation date of 6 June 1996 as the applicant would have insufficient time to clear the command with a separation date of 28 May 1996.
On 6 June 1996, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for alcohol rehabilitation failure. He had
completed 1 year, 11 months, and 15 days of creditable active service and had no lost time. Item 18 of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, indicates that he did not complete his first full term of service.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 provides for the discharge of members based on alcohol or other drug abuse when the soldier is enrolled in ADAPCP and the commander, in consultation with the rehabilitation team, determines that further rehabilitation efforts are not practical, rendering the soldier a rehabilitative failure.
The VA, in determining qualifications for benefits administered by that agency, generally holds that an individual who accepts a discharge prior to completion of his complete term of obligated service may not be eligible for benefits unless or until the VA or the Service Department determines that the early discharge amounted to a complete and unconditional separation from the service.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant provides no evidence to show he was improperly briefed concerning his eligibility for VA medical benefits nor any evidence to show he would have been allowed to stay on active duty an additional 15 days if he had known he needed that time to obtain those benefits.
3. There is insufficient evidence to correct the applicant’s records to show he remained on active duty an additional 15 days or to show that his early discharge amounted to a complete and unconditional separation from the service.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo___ __rjw___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002066727 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020409 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708421
On 5 December 1991, the commander recommended the applicant’s discharge from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitative failure. He recommended Track III in-patient treatment prior to or at the time of the applicant’s separation from the military. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708421C070209
On 5 December 1991, the commander recommended the applicants discharge from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitative failure. However, it appears that his honorable discharge of 21 March 1988 should be considered as having been issued as a complete and unconditional separation. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was eligible for a complete and unconditional...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100770C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 December 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100770 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his of earlier request to correct his record to show he was retired due to a physical disability with pay and benefits, in lieu of being discharged with a general...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066461C070402
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, the Board previously found that he failed to provide evidence showing an error or injustice in his separation processing. He concludes that it is his opinion that the applicant never abused alcohol, and this action was taken to present an example to others. The record clearly shows that the applicant was entitled to have his case considered by an administrative separation board, a forum at which he could have presented his evidence to contest the basis for his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019284
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Records show the applicant had completed a total of 6 years, 2 months, and 9 days of creditable active service at the time of separation with no lost time. At the time of the applicant's separation, an honorable or general discharge was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707921
On 29 July 1958 the applicant’s commander recommended that a board of officers be convened to determine whether the applicant should be separated for Unsuitability or Unfitness. However, it is apparent that the applicant was alcoholic, and his alcoholic behavior was the basis for his discharge. As such, the Board considers his Undesirable Discharge too harsh, especially in consideration of his combat service, his wound and his POW status.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076917C070215
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 13 December 1982, the applicant's commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. On 11 January 1983, the applicant was discharged with a general discharge, in pay grade E-5, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for alcohol abuse - rehabilitation failure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008544
On 29 January 1997, the following synopsis of the applicant's Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) rehabilitation activities was provided to his unit: a. The unit commander cited: * the applicant was enrolled in ADAPCP on 14 January 1994 * he was disenrolled from ADAPCP on 6 February 1996 * he was enrolled in ADAPCP on 28 January 1997 for the second time * he demonstrated a lack of potential for continued Army service due to his failure to follow his treatment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705738
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Accordingly, on 6 December...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705738C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Accordingly, on 6 December...