Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066576C070402
Original file (2002066576C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066576

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

APPLICANT STATES: That he was awarded the CIB and the ARCOM; however, they were omitted from his report of separation (DD Form 214).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted on 23 August 1989, for a period of 4 years, training in an infantry career management field, a cash enlistment bonus and assignment to the Continental United States. He successfully completed his training at Fort Benning, Georgia, and was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas, for duty as an indirect fire infantryman with the 2d Battalion, 16th Infantry.

On 8 January 1991, he deployed with his unit to Saudi-Arabia in support of Operation Desert Storm/Shield. He remained there in a temporary duty status until he was returned to Fort Riley on 12 May 1991. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 24 October 1991.

On 22 August 1992, he was honorably released from active duty, per his request, under the Fiscal Year 1992 Early Transition Program. He had served 3 years of total active service and was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Lapel Button, the Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal.

A review of the applicant’s records fails to show any evidence that he was awarded the CIB or ARCOM.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the primary requirement for award of a decoration is that a formal recommendation be prepared and introduced into official military channels within 2 years of the act, achievement, or service to be recognized. The sole exception to the 2-year time limit occurs when there is conclusive evidence that a formal recommendation was submitted but was lost, or through inadvertence was never acted on by proper authority.

That regulation also provides the criteria for award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, the evidence of record fails to show that during his assignment he performed the duties of an infantryman while engaged in ground combat against the enemy. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that in accordance with the applicable regulations governing award of the CIB, he is not entitled to be awarded that badge.

3. The applicant has also failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was awarded the ARCOM, accordingly there is no basis to add that award to his records at this time.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___rks __ __wtm___ __clg____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066576
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/04/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 66 107.0020/ARCOM
2. 157 107.0111/CIB
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090958C070212

    Original file (2003090958C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Although the applicant had an infantry MOS and served in an infantry unit during Operation Desert Storm, there are no orders awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002282C070206

    Original file (20050002282C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Kuwait Liberation Medal (KLM), awarded by the Government of Kuwait. There are no orders in the applicant’s personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence shows that the applicant was awarded the KLM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090949C070212

    Original file (2003090949C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has failed to show through the evidence presented and the evidence of record that he was awarded the CIB. However, the evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003261C070206

    Original file (20050003261C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the MSM and ARCOM during his active duty tenure, as evidenced by entries in Item 9 of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 and documents on file in his MPRJ. In this case, the award documents on file in the applicant’s record confirm he served in the primary duty of driver during his assignment to SWA. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013103

    Original file (20080013103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was assigned as the First Sergeant of Company B, 5th Battalion, 16th Infantry, Fort Riley, KS, on 27 December 1988. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1992 shows, among other awards, that he was awarded one award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072619C070403

    Original file (2002072619C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, on 20 July 1992 which added the Expert Infantryman Badge, the Southwest Asia Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars, the Kuwait Liberation Medal, and the Overseas Service Ribbon. The applicant was issued a second DD Form 215 on 5 February 2002 which added his PH and ARCOM. b. issuing to him a new DD Form 214 which contains the CIB, the KLM (SA) and the KLM (K), along with the awards contained on his other two DD Forms 215.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057950C070420

    Original file (2001057950C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that an ARCOM he was awarded is missing from separation document and although he was recommended for the AGCM by his unit commander, he never received the award. It states, in pertinent part, that a member is entitled to receive the AGCM for each 3 years completed. It states, in pertinent part, that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009569

    Original file (20060009569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests his records be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and his participation in Operation Just Cause. The applicant states he earned the ARCOM and the CIB, but neither is shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067893C070402

    Original file (2002067893C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was not awarded the CIB for his service in Southwest Asia (SWA) during the Gulf War and desires it to be done at this time. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. In view of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073010C070403

    Original file (2002073010C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...