| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests promotion reconsideration to major in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps (JAGC).
3. The applicant states that he was erroneously passed over for promotion to major for being educationally unqualified. He states he was unable to complete Phase II of the Judge Advocate Officer Advanced Course (JAOAC) by the time the 1996 promotion board met during March 1996; however, he completed Phase I on 1 August 1995 and had satisfied all other requirements. He states he successfully completed Phase II in June 1996, as early as it was possible to do so. He submits a statement in his own behalf, copies of his Phase II completion certificates, a Service School Academic Evaluation Report and a letter dated 19 September 1995 from an Army National Guard (ARNG) JA Advisor in support of his application.
4. The applicant was considered but not selected for promotion to major by the 1995 and 1996 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB’s). The reason shown for the non-selections was that he was not educationally qualified. He had not completed the required officer advance course.
5. On 19 September 1995, an ARNG Judge Advocate Advisor informed the applicant’s command, that JAGC officers appointed with military education stipulations will be considered to be educationally qualified for promotion if satisfactorily progressing toward completion of military education at the date promotion boards convene. The advisor recommended that the applicant be deemed to be educationally qualified for promotion since he completed all possible course work over seven months prior to the date of his promotion board. The advisor also stated that the applicant’s first opportunity to take Phase II was in June 1996.
6. On 17 September 2001, the applicant forwarded a letter to the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), citing his appreciation for finally receiving consideration for his request submitted on 28 August 1996. He provided further documentation in support of his request. He showed his current rank as Sergeant, JA, Michigan ARNG.
7. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) showed material error when he was considered and non-selected by the RCSB’s. He was erroneously considered as not educationally qualified.
8. Army Regulation 135-155, concerning promotion of Reserve officers, requires promotion to major be based upon selection by an RCSB. It specifies that promotion reconsideration by a special selection board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error, which existed in the record at the time of consideration. Material error in this context is one or more errors of such a nature that, in the judgment of the reviewing official (or body), it caused an individual’s non-selection by a promotion board and, that had such error(s) been corrected at the time the individual was considered, a reasonable chance would have resulted that the individual would have been recommended for promotion. The regulation also provides that boards are not required to divulge the proceedings or the reason(s) for non-selection, except where an individual is not qualified due to non-completion of required military schooling.
9. The regulation also states that JAGC officers appointed with a military education completion stipulation will be considered to be educationally qualified for promotion if progressing satisfactorily (portion of required education completed is equal to or greater than that portion of allowed time elapsed following appointment) toward completion of military education at the date the promotion boards convene.
10. It is noted in this case that the applicant’s request is dated 28 August 1996, and that this Board received it on 3 January 2002 without his official records. The Office of Promotions provided his Promotion Consideration Folder for review.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to major and should now be submitted to SSB’s for promotion reconsideration under 1995 and/or 1996 criteria, as appropriate.
2. The Board notes that the applicant completed Phase I of the JAOC course and based on the military education stipulation at the time of his appointment, he was educationally qualified for promotion to major. He had enrolled in Phase II by the date of the 1996 promotion board, and was progressing satisfactorily toward completion of the military education.
3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, and in so far as the Department of the Army is concerned, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was educationally qualified at the time of the RCSB’s.
2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his records be submitted to duly constituted SSB’s as appropriate.
3. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.
4. That if the applicant was separated because of his non-selection, his records be further corrected to show:
a. that his discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve, as applicable, is void, and of no force or effect, that he was credited with qualifying service for
Reserve retirement for his respective retirement years, from the dates of his now-voided discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve to the date of his return to the active Reserve;
b. that an adequate explanation be placed in his official personnel files to show that the gap in his officer evaluation reports, from the dates of his now-voided discharge transfer to the Retired Reserve to the date of return to active Reserve status, was not caused by any fault on his part, and to insure that he is not prejudiced thereby in the consideration of any future personnel actions; and
c. that all documents related to his now-voided non-selection for promotion, and his discharge or transfer be expunged from his official military records.
5. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
BOARD VOTE:
_inw____ _hof____ _dph____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Irene N. Wheelwright
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066392 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010115 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083693C070212
In his advisory opinion, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, stated that the Board has the authority to grant a waiver or exception to policy for the date the degree was conferred, and since the applicant completed all requirements prior to the board, he recommended that the applicant be granted a waiver for the educational requirement. Paragraph 2-9, of the above regulations states, "Effective 1 October 1995, no person may be selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of CPT unless, not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087567C070212
The applicant states that he was passed over for the education requirement on his 2001 captain board and disallowed a special selection board (SSB), despite being educationally qualified at the time of the board. The Board concludes that it would be unjust to deny the applicant promotion reconsideration based on the technicality that his degree was not formally conferred prior to the convening date of the 2001 promotion board given he had completed all the academic requirements for a BS...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020845
The regulation further specifies that the Chief, Office of Promotions, is the approval authority for all current year criteria requests for exception to non-statutory promotion requirements (i.e., civilian education), and that requests must contain complete justification and be received prior to the board convening date. The evidence of record shows the applicant was twice considered for promotion to CPT but he was not selected by reason of not being educationally qualified. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078832C070215
The Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, stated that their office had the authority to grant an educational waiver for an upcoming RCSB only and the request must be received in their office prior to the convening date of the selection board. The applicant did not request a waiver prior to the convening date of the 2002 board; therefore, their office denied his request. However, based on the fact that the applicant had not completed his military education by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014256C071113
The applicant states, in effect, that the previously granted constructive credit for his military education was not sufficient for the promotion board and was entered into the personnel system as completion of the Command and General Staff Officer Course (CGSOC). The applicant requested the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) publish a specific and final decision granting him MLED-4 equivalent and/or constructive credit. The applicant had from the time of his promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004168C070206
The applicant states, in effect, that his lack of consideration for promotion to captain in the Army Reserve was unjust as he was on active duty as an enlisted member of the US Army when the promotion board convened. The regulation states dual components officers who are in the zone of consideration will be considered by a promotion board. To determine if there is an error in the promotion file, the officer may request, within 2 years of the board recess date, a copy of his or her file, as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057442C070420
The applicant’s military records were not provided to the Board. The Chief, Promotion and Notifications Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, expressed the opinion that a review of the applicant’s record revealed that she was considered but not recommended by the 1999 and 2000 Major Army Medical Department RCSB’s due to not meeting the required civilian education requirements. She was granted a STRAP extension in December 1999 and did not complete the degree until August 31, 2000.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009222
The memorandum also informed him that the records reviewed by the board did not indicate that he had completed the required military education by the day of the board. c. He submitted a memorandum on 9 February 2007 to the Army Correspondence Course Program requesting constructive credit for Phase I of the QM advanced course; however, there is no evidence that his request was approved. For MAJ boards, the military education requirement is completion of an officer advanced course or equivalent.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097212C070212
The TADLP Enrollment History, provided by the applicant, indicates that in July 2003, just prior to receiving notification that he had been considered and not selected for promotion to major a second time, the applicant enrolled in the Reserve Component Transportation Officer Advanced Course Phase I. All 12 courses associated with that OAC were issued to the applicant on 10 July 2003 and by 29 September 2003 the applicant had completed all of the course requirements. Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006144C071029
The G-1 memorandum went on to state that the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components retains authority to grant military education waivers to requesting officers, but waivers must be granted under more restrictive conditions. The G-1 memorandum also stated that, in situations where the officer applying for a military education waiver does not meet the minimum conditions set out in paragraphs 2a through 2d, and the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components deems the case to...