Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002060264C070402
Original file (2002060264C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 30 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002060264

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member
Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be honorably discharged for an unfulfilled enlistment agreement.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect , that he enlisted under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) with the understanding that the Army would pay back his student loans. However, before the first payment was made, the loans went into default and he was forced to pay the interest on the loans out of his own packet because the first payment was not made on time. He also states that while in basic training, he turned in his paperwork to his drill sergeant and did not see them until graduation. He goes on to state that he lived up to his agreement and the Army did not, accordingly, he desires to be honorably discharged based on the Army’s failure to fulfill the conditions of his contract.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on 8 September 1999 for a period of 4 years, enlistment in the pay grade of E-4, training in infantry career management field 11, assignment to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, a cash enlistment bonus of $9,000 and participation in the Student Loan Repayment Program.

At the time of his enlistment, a Statement of Understanding (DA Form 3286-66) was prepared as an Annex D to his contract, in which he initialed. The statement indicates that enlistment under the SLRP ensured that if he met and maintained the prescribed prerequisites, the amount of 33 1/3% of his loan or $1,500 (whichever was greater) would be paid on his loan for each successful year of service completed, commencing on his enlistment date. It also states that he understood that it was his responsibility to secure a military deferment or maintain his account in good standing until such time as repayment was started and that repayment amounts were subject to State and Federal taxes each year payments were made.

On 6 November 2000, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 7, for unfulfilled enlistment commitment. His request was forwarded to the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) Separation Branch for action. In processing his request, the Separations Branch forwarded his request to the Education Incentives Branch for additional information. The Education Incentives Branch opined that the applicant had been enrolled in the SLRP as an exception to policy and as soon as he was set up in the system, he was sent an application packet. He entered active duty on 8 September 1999 and his eligibility for payment was not verified until 24 October 2000. Upon verification of his eligibility, a Department of Defense (DOD) Educational Loan Repayment Program Annual Application (DD Form 2475) was sent to the applicant. The DD Form 2475 was received from the financial institution on 24 November 2000 and the first years payment was authorized on the same day and submitted to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to dispatch payment. Provided the applicant remains on active duty, his third payment of $2,383.20 will be authorized in September 2002.

The Separations Branch responded to the applicant’s request for discharge on 5 January 2001, advising him that his request was carefully reviewed and was disapproved. It further advised him that if the loan holder did not receive payment within 90 days of authorization, it could contact the DFAS.

Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of persons, with or without prior service (PS), into the Regular Army (RA) and the USAR. Chapter 9 (Enlistment Programs/Options) indicates that these programs/options are designed to merge valid Army requirements with personal desires.

Table 9-4 contains guidance on enlistment option program 9C (Bonus/Army College Fund/Loan Repayment Program). It contains specific guidance pertaining to the LRP and indicates that the government will repay a designated portion of any loan incurred that was made, insured, or guaranteed under part
B of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (Guaranteed Student Loan) or any loan under part E of such act (National Direct Student Loan) after 1 October 1975 and before enlistment into the Regular Army. It also provides that the individual must ensure that a deferment is secured and maintains their account in good standing until such time as repayment is made. The SLRP provides that payment is not authorized for an account that is in default status nor may payments be made to the individual concerned. All payments will be made to the financial institutions that hold the authorized loans.

Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 7, provides the criteria for the separation of enlisted personnel for defective or unfulfilled enlistment agreements. It provides, in pertinent part, that an unfulfilled enlistment commitment exists when the soldier received a written enlistment commitment from recruiting personnel for which the soldier was qualified, but which cannot be fulfilled by the Army and the soldier did not knowingly take part in the creation of the unfulfilled enlistment commitment. Soldiers separated under this provision will receive an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. Although the applicant asserts that he submitted the paperwork to his chain of command in a timely manner, there is no evidence in the available records to show that his paperwork was unduly delayed.

2. The available information shows that once the paperwork was submitted by the applicant, it was processed in a timely manner. While his first payment was not made on the anniversary of his enlistment, it was made within 2 months of his anniversary and only because of the delay in receiving verification of eligibility. While the Board cannot determine why the delay in establishing eligibility occurred, the applicant acknowledged that it was his responsibility to keep his loan current until the first payment was made. While he may not agree with the terms now, that is what he agreed to in his contract. Although it is not the policy of the Army to delay such payments, in some cases they do occur. However, such delays in processing do not constitute an unfulfilled contract.

3. The Army has paid the first two of three installments of his SLRP agreement (based on completion of 2 years of service) and the third payment is scheduled for payment in September 2002. It appears that the Army has met all of the remaining terms of his contract and the Board finds no merit to his contentions.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___teo __ __ao____ __hof ___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002060264
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.144.9909 941/A9909/DEFCT ENL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008782C070205

    Original file (20060008782C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted for the LRP incentive in addition to other incentives. He has $47,173.87 in qualifying loans; however, it appears that the loan he received from Citibank was not an educational loan. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient evidence to show he believed, upon his enlistment, that his Citibank “loan” qualified for repayment under the LRP or that he predicated his enlistment solely on his belief that his Citibank “loan” qualified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008710C070205

    Original file (20060008710C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that although there was no addendum or Statement of Option on the applicant’s enlistment contract, he did enlist under the LRP. In doing so, the applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program was added and included the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002501C070206

    Original file (20050002501C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion stated that the applicant and his unit failed on more than one occasion to complete the required SLRP documentation correctly, the original amount of his student loan was $8451, and the applicant continued to make payments on his loans. Although the advisory opinion indicated the applicant's loans were in default in 2004, there is no evidence to show they were in default at any time prior to his release from the Selected Reserve in March 1999. Therefore, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012373C080213

    Original file (20070012373C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the Army repay her student loan under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) as per her enlistment contract. The applicant provides four DD Forms 2475 (DOD Educational Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Annual Application), dated 5 April 2006, 2 March 2007, 20 March 2007, and 8 June 2007, all four indicating a loan amount of $3,707.49; a DA Form 200 (Transmittal Record), dated 16 December 2006; a memorandum, dated 5 June 2006; Annex S (Student Loan Repayment Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020000

    Original file (20080020000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence the applicant submitted a DD Form 2475 upon completion of his first year of service (i.e., on 1 November 2006) to request loan repayment. However, the evidence of record also shows the applicant’s student loan had been paid in full as of 12 February 2007. The evidence of record also shows that repayment of a portion of the qualifying loan will be made after each complete satisfactory year of service performed under the SLRP agreement by the individual.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002757C070208

    Original file (20040002757C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. d. DD Form 2475 (DOD Educational Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Annual Application), dated 20 October 2003. e. A copy of his promissory note. As a result, the Board recommends that the applicant’s DA Form 3286-66, Statement of Understanding, US Army Incentive Enlistment Program, be amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the SLRP, and the government fails to verify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011952C070205

    Original file (20060011952C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    complete the required entries on the DD Form 1966; c.) if enlisting for the Loan Repayment Program, disenroll the applicant or Soldier from the GI Bill; and d.) verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if enlisting for the Loan Repayment Program. Broad discretion is available to this Board under Title 10, US Code, Section 1552, which includes the authority to amend the applicant’s DA Form 3286-66 to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002355C070206

    Original file (20050002355C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests repayment of all his student loans from the period 19 July 1991 through 6 September 2002 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). The Student Loan Repayment office determined the applicant's total amount repayable would have been $3,136.92 (from 1994 through May 1996 when the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army). Nevertheless, the Student Loan Repayment office determined the applicant's total amount repayable would have been $3,136.92 had all of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005985C070206

    Original file (20050005985C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there are no Army records that the Board can correct that would allow payment of the applicant’s non-qualifying loan under the SLRP. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029857

    Original file (20100029857.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY * DA Form 5261-2-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program – Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 26 June 2001 * DA Form 3540 (Certificate and Acknowledgement of U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment) * DA Form 5261-4-R (SLRP Addendum) * DA Form 5435-R (Statement of Understanding – The Selected Reserve Montgomery GI Bill) *...