| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application to correct his military records by upgrading his undesirable discharge to a general discharge.
3. The applicant, in effect, states that during his time in the Army he was an alcoholic. He was discharged from the Army in 1962 and remained an alcoholic until 1978. It was only after he stopped drinking for several years that he felt he could ask for his records to be changed. He still does not ask for an honorable discharge but for a general discharge. He admits that he had a drinking problem and is truly sorry for the things he did while in the Army. It still troubles him. He has changed his life completely and is only asking for forgiveness from his country and would appreciate it if the Board would reconsider his request.
4. The applicant submitted a copy of a high school diploma, which indicates that in 1989, he earned a high school equivalency diploma. He also submitted a personal statement and letters of support from family, friends and his minister.
5. The applicant’s submission is new evidence that requires Board consideration.
6. The Memorandum of Consideration (MOC) of the Board’s 27 May 1998 review of the case (AC97-06039) is incorporated herein by reference as if wholly set forth.
7. The referenced MOC reflects that the applicant enlisted on 7 July 1959 for 3 years. During the period 1 July 1961 to 5 March 1962, he was AWOL 5 times; he violated restriction imposed under previous punishment by Article 15 Uniform Code of Military Justice; he misappropriated a government vehicle and was convicted by a summary and a special court-martial for these offenses. He was separated on 21 June 1962. He was credited with 2 years, 10 months and 26 days credible service with 19 days of lost time.
8. In summary, the letters supporting his request attest that the applicant has stopped drinking. The applicant expresses remorse for his behavior in the Army and states that he has become a responsible husband, father, employee, and citizen. The undesirable discharge was a source of shame that added to his feeling of self-hate. They attest that the applicant is a person who has made mistakes, who has learned from those mistakes, and has tried to better not only himself, but to help other as well. His wife left him because of his drinking, but because he stopped drinking remarried him. He has served as a Sunday School Superintendent responsible for the Christian education of some 150 students.
9. The applicant, in his personal statement, recalls that when he enlisted at the age of 17 he was already a drinker. He did a pretty good job in the Army for about two years. He initially could control the drinking but as the years went by it became too much and the drinking started to control him. He began "staying out" and being AWOL which led to his discharge. He continued to drink after the discharge and lost his wife. He then began to see that what he was doing was wrong, stopped drinking, remarried his wife, and has not had a drink in 20 years. He knows it has been a long time since his discharge, but this has been on his mind all of the time.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s administrative separation under the provisions of AR 635-208 by reason of undesirable habits and traits was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
2. The Board believes the applicant's contention that his behavior was attributed to his excessive use of alcohol. Although, the Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct of record, sufficient evidence exists which tends to show that the preponderance of the applicant’s misconduct was related to his abuse of alcohol.
3. The Board noted that in 1962 the Army did not have an alcohol or drug abuse program in place to assist soldiers who were identified as chronic alcohol users and in need of alcohol rehabilitation.
4. Given the circumstances of this case the minimal amount of lost time, the fact that he served over 34 months of his 36 month enlistment, that he had served two years before the first offense, the lack of available rehabilitation, and the passage of 40 years since his separation, the Board believes that clemency is warranted. It appears that the interest of justice would best be served by changing the applicant’s characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.
5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below would rectify an injustice.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the service with a General Discharge Certificate on 21 June 1962.
2. That the Department of the Army issue to the individual concerned a General Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States, dated 21 June 1962, in lieu of the undesirable discharge of the same date now held by him.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__aao_ __ ___kah__ ___tl____ DENY APPLICATION
__________Arthur A. Omartian______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2001066136 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | AC97-06039 |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020730 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.9320.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078823C070215
He completed 2 years, 11 months and 2 days of total active service and he had approximately 84 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. On 18 February 1963, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. However, there is no evidence of record that shows that he was an alcoholic while he was in the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019971
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) in lieu of an application for correction of military records with a self-authored statement and exhibits 13 through 22. On 8 August 1983, the applicant underwent a separation physical in which he indicated he was in "good health."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061669C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 August 1962, was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of general supply specialist, served in Korea, was promoted to the rank of sergeant, and was honorably discharged on 10 April 1964, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. The applicant’s records clearly show that his last period of service was not served honorably...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8110592B
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant stated at that time that he had no trouble in the Army until he returned from Korea and that some of his AWOL time had been associated with his inability to deal with the death of his father and with the suicide of his first wife. His drinking, of course, led to AWOLs.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073994C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 3 January 1962, the board of officers recommended that the applicant be separated from the service due to unfitness and be given an undesirable discharge.10. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:a. voiding his undesirable discharge of 5 February 1962;
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074112C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 13 April 1962, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. The applicant’s good service during his first enlistment was recognized with an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010845
The applicant submitted a letter from a friend who states the applicant worked for his father back in the early 1960's before the applicant started his own transmission service. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant's records were not available for the Board's review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075065C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be upgraded to honorable. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709670
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019914
The applicant, the wife of a former service member (FSM), requests an upgrade of her husband's undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.