Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066040C070421
Original file (2001066040C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 4 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001066040

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he served in the Regular Army instead of the Army National Guard.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he enlisted in the Regular Army and was never in the National Guard. He contends that due to family problems he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

COUNSEL CONTENDS: The American Legion, as counsel for the applicant, invites the Board’s attention to the injustice raised by the applicant. Counsel opines that this submission, in conjunction with the official Army records, amply advance the applicant’s contentions and substantially reflect the probative facts needed for an equitable review.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 17 April 1958, the applicant enlisted in the New Mexico Army National Guard (NMARNG) for a period of 3 years. He was ordered to active duty for training on 22 June 1958 and was honorably released from active duty on 19 December 1958 and returned to the NMARNG to complete his remaining service obligation of 2 years and 4 months. On 16 April 1961, the applicant was honorably discharged from the NMARNG and transferred to the USAR. He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 April 1964.

The applicant’s DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract), dated 17 April 1958, shows he enlisted in the NMARNG for a period of 3 years.

There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.

The applicant’s military records show that he was issued a DD Form 214 at the time of his release from active duty training on 19 December 1958.

Army Regulation 635-5 establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. In pertinent part, it directs that a DD Form 214 will only be issued for active duty service.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows he enlisted in the Regular Army.

2. The applicant’s contention that he was never in the National Guard is not supported by the evidence of record. His enlistment contract shows he enlisted in the NMARNG on 17 April 1958 for a period of 3 years. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

AAO___ RWA_____ KYF_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001066040
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020404
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 113.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011428C070208

    Original file (20040011428C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 1 (Name [Last]), 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Service in the program for enlisted members who retain that status remains creditable under all provisions. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214, in item 12d will be corrected to show that he had no prior active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082870C070215

    Original file (2002082870C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve with proper benefits and reversal of his New Mexico Army National Guard (NMARNG) 1999 Selective Retention Board (SRB). The evidence also indicates that he was selectively retained for 1-year by the SRB convening authority for the purpose of completing his required civilian education, a bachelor's degree. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063398C070421

    Original file (2001063398C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was issued a DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, and was returned to the Wisconsin Army National Guard. The applicant was released from active duty on 10 August 1962 and returned to state control as a member of the Wisconsin Army National Guard. In pertinent part, it directs that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for each member of the Army National Guard released after completion of 90 days or more of active duty for training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000707C070206

    Original file (20050000707C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. She adds that she was led to believe by NMARNG personnel managers that she required Officer Basic Course (OBC) completion in order to be promoted, but she later learned this was not true in her case because she was an Early Commissioning Program (ECP) graduate. ROPMA states that promotion to 1LT will take place after 2 years of commissioned service and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013466C070206

    Original file (20050013466C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and orders; his AGONM Form 600-1 (Request for Discharge, NMARNG); his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) and orders; and his ARNG personnel records, in support of his request. The applicant was notified that as stated in Chapter 6-4 of the National Guard Regulation 600-5, Soldiers would be separated without board action and he did not have the right to an appeal or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060807C070421

    Original file (2001060807C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 January 1991, the 3/200 ADA battalion commander sent to the applicant at his Loveland, Colorado, address, a AGONM Form 20-12-11B.2 (Record of Special Proceeding of Non-Judicial Punishment – Absence from Unit Training Assembly, Drill, or Annual Training), notifying the applicant of the commander’s intent to impose an Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), punishment of reduction in grade as a result of his 16 unexcused absences from unit drill from September through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005833C070206

    Original file (20050005833C070206.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette B. McPherson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service, a period of more than 1 year is considered a qualifying period for award of the AGCM; however, this is only applicable when a member actually leaves active duty. The evidence of record does show the applicant received an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064764C070421

    Original file (2001064764C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not correctly reflect his record of service, his home of record (HOR), his place of entry on active duty, his unit of assignment, or his two awards of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). He goes on to state that he entered active duty on 26 April 1985, and remained on continuous active duty as an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Recruiter until he was honorably released from active duty on 31 December 1999, and was transferred to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010521C070208

    Original file (20040010521C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, reinstatement in the Reserve in a commissioned officer status. Army Regulation 135-155 also specifies that promotion to major requires completion of 7 years time in grade and an OAC not later than the day before the selection board convening date is required for promotion qualification to major.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083395C070215

    Original file (2002083395C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was informed at the time that he would have to be discharged before he could enlist in the Regular Army and that he could only enlist in the pay grade of E-7. On 30 July 2002, the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) authorized the applicant to enlist in the Regular Army on 15 August 2002, for a period of 4 years, in the pay grade of E-7. It provides, in pertinent part, that if a Reserve of the Army enlisted soldier serving on extended active duty in the Active Army enlists in the...