| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request to upgrade his undesirable discharge to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he believes the character of his discharge was too "harsh and unjust." He states that while assigned to Germany he received word that his father had died and he was given 30 days of emergency leave to attend the funeral. He notes that after the funeral he did not return to Germany but stayed home to care for his mother and younger brother. He states that he felt like he "had to stay home and take care of the family instead of going back to duty." He indicates that he was subsequently arrested and returned to military control at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. When given the choice between being discharged or court-martialed, he elected to be discharged believing he would be able to have his discharge upgraded at a later date.
The applicant states that he was incapacitated by a stroke in 1977, after his separation, and maintains that his "mental condition from the stroke is justification to reopen [his] case after all these years and correct this injustice." He also notes that he "received two honorable discharges; one from the Oklahoma National Guard and one from the U.S. Navy" which should count for something.
Other than his self-authored statement, the applicant submits no evidence in support of his request.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: In the applicant's original application to the Board (AC8401640) he argued that his use of drug resulted in his "adverse actions." In his most recent application he maintains that the death of his father, family situation, and subsequent stroke, warrant upgrading his discharge. In view of the fact that he has raised a new issue in his current request, the Board has determined that reconsideration of his request to upgrade his discharge is warranted.
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case in 1984 (AC8401640).
The applicant's records indicate that he arrived in Germany in June 1975 and departed enroute to the United States on 30 September 1976. A record of emergency data, completed on 29 September 1976, indicates his father was deceased.
The applicant was apparently assigned to Fort Sill, Oklahoma upon his return to the United States. On 16 November 1976, while assigned to Fort Sill, the applicant was punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) for several days of AWOL (absent without leave) in October 1976.
On 12 January 1977 the applicant again departed AWOL and was subsequently dropped from the rolls of the Army. He was apprehended by civilian authorities and returned to military control on 31 March 1977.
A 7 April 1977 record of emergency data, which the applicant authenticated, listed his father as residing in Bokchito, Oklahoma, the same address the applicant's mother was residing at when the September 1976 record of emergency data was completed.
Bokchito, Oklahoma is approximately 175 miles from Fort Sill.
On 8 April 1977 the applicant was placed in an excess leave status and on
25 April 1977 he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in accordance with his request. He was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Documents contained in the applicant's file, which appear to have been submitted in support of his 1984 application to the Board, or in support of his previous petitions to the Army Discharge Review Board, indicate that the applicant's AWOL period was related to his use of drugs. At one point his mother claims the applicant was introduced to drugs by his "lieutenant" while in Germany, but the applicant indicated in his 1984 application to this Board that his drug use began during his period of service with the Navy. His mother indicated that after the applicant's father died he did not want to go back to Germany because of the drugs.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. It is unclear when the applicant's father died. However, it appears the applicant's father may have died in September 1976, which precipitated the applicant's return to the United States and subsequent assignment to Fort Sill. His contention that he departed AWOL to stay with his family is not supported by any evidence in available records, nor in any evidence provided by the applicant.
2. The Board notes that the applicant had two periods of AWOL following his return to the United States and assignment to Fort Sill; one in October and the second beginning in January 1977. The Board also notes that the applicant's family was residing approximately 175 miles from Fort Sill, which, the Board contends, would have been close enough for the applicant to provide support and still perform his military duties.
3. The applicant's discharge was appropriate and not unduly harsh considering the basis for his separation. He has presented no evidence which would serve as a basis to upgrade the character of his discharge. The fact that he may have received an honorable discharge from the Army National Guard and U.S. Naval Reserve, or that he subsequently suffered a stroke, while unfortunate, does not justify, nor serve as a basis to upgrade his discharge.
4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__AAO ___RWA_ __KYF__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001065904 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020404 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019194
The applicant's request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his request. Based on his record of indiscipline, including his bar to reenlistment and 7 months and 18 days of time lost, due to being AWOL and in confinement, his service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. _______ _ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072028C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Although the specifics are not contained in the available records, his records show that nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him on 9 July 1969 for misconduct and his punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016052C070206
On 25 July 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service. 9 In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017096
The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 28 November 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and directed he receive a UOTHC discharge. The applicant's request includes a DD Form 293 which shows he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064297C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct (fraudulent entry, conviction by civil court, and absence without leave or desertion).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005737
On 2 March 1976, the applicant surrendered to military authorities at Fort Sill, where charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 7 January to 2 March 1976. There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. The applicants contentions have been noted; however, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010821C071029
In the request the applicant submitted to the Board originally, he stated he was supposed to be discharged for medical reasons because of a back injury from a motorcycle accident, and that he was, at the time, trying to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits. A copy of a DA Form 31, Request and Authority for Leave, in the applicant's service record shows he was allowed to go on excess leave pending approval of his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court- martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014305
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In this statement, the applicant requested that his leave to Guam be categorized as emergency leave for a family emergency, and that Becky M____ stood in loco parentis for more than 5 years (in place of parents 24 hours a day) before he became 21 years of age. As the validity of the applicant's claim that Becky M____ stood in loco parentis for more than 5 years before he became 21 cannot be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013669
The applicant states, in effect: * his mother was sick at the time with ulcerative colitis and his father had died 6 days after he entered active duty * as the only child, he requested a compassionate reassignment to Fort Riley, KS to be closer to his mother; his request was denied * because he felt this decision was unfair and he needed to be with his mother, he absented himself without authority from his unit * today, this would have been handled as a hardship discharge, but he was instead...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017990C070206
Ernestine Fields | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant failed to report to the attached unit. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand...