Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065839C070421
Original file (2001065839C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 18 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065839

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Mr. Allen L. Raub Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he retired in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant (E-6) and that he is awarded retroactive pay and allowances.

APPLICANT STATES: That he did not commit the offense the way that it was alleged and that he did not intend to do anything wrong.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 15 May 1985, he enlisted in the Army in the pay grade of E-1. He successfully completed his training as a cook and he remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments and extensions.

The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s numerous reductions are not a part of the available records. The records do show that he was promoted to pay grade E-2 on 15 November 1985, to E-3 on 15 May 1986 and to E-4 on 1 July 1987. He was reduced to pay grade E-3 on 12 March 1990 and he was advanced to E-4 again on 1 July 1990. He was promoted to pay grade E-5 on 1 April 1991 and to E-6 on 1 November 1996. On 25 November 1996, the applicant was reduced to the pay grade of E-5 and on 17 December 1996, he was reduced to pay grade E-4.

His Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) shows that he was honorably discharged as a result of a permanent disability on 7 October 2001, in the pay grade of E-4. He had completed 16 years, 4 months and 23 days of total active service.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.

2. The evidence of record shows that he was discharged on 7 October 2001, in the pay grade of E-4. Therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct as currently reflected and he is not entitled to retroactive pay and allowances.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mm___ ___alr___ ___kak __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065839
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/06/18
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 283 128.0000
2. 302 129.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082908C070215

    Original file (2002082908C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application to the Army Grade Determination Board (AGRDB) requesting advancement on the Retired list to the pay grade of E-7. This law authorizes Reserve enlisted members of the Army to be placed on the Retired List in the highest enlisted grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. The laws and regulations in effect at that time provided for his placement on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD, and for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006322

    Original file (20060006322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060006322 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant provides copies of pages 1 through 8 of a DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment), a DA Form 4824-R (Addendum to Certificate for Personnel Applying for Participation in the ROTC/SMP), a DD Form 4/1,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066926C070402

    Original file (2002066926C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's available military records show: The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant absented himself from his unit and was reduced in grade accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071977C070403

    Original file (2002071977C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general under honorable conditions. He also states that he put in 5 good years of service and 6 years of good service in the Army Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085053C070212

    Original file (2003085053C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to SPC with an effective date and with a date of rank of 1 November 1993. The applicant was reduced from PFC to private (PV2), pay grade E-2 with an effective date of 21 November 1996 and with a date of rank of 7 March 1991 by Company B, 898th Engineer Battalion Orders Number 4-1, dated 21 November 1996, for unsatisfactory participation. The applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 8 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091704C070212

    Original file (03091704C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was discharged on 29 August 1991. Officers on active duty should submit a copy of the SMP contract, commissioning orders, Statement of Service for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes (DA Form 1506) or DD Form 214, to their respective Personnel Officer. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105981C070208

    Original file (2004105981C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 December 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004105981 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that he be issued a certificate of promotion for his lateral appointment from Specialist to Corporal. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067761C070402

    Original file (2002067761C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show he participated in the SMP as a member of the Middle Tennessee State University ROTC and the ARNG from 14 October 1985 until his commissioning on 8 May 1987. On 14 October 1985, the applicant enlisted in the Tennessee ARNG. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who also participated in the SMP, retroactive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057979C070420

    Original file (2001057979C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-3 and a forfeiture of pay (both suspended until 9 April 1990), restriction and extra duty. The Retention Control Point (RCP) established for the pay grade of E-4 was 8 years of maximum service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084214C070212

    Original file (2003084214C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that he feels it unjust that he did not receive separation pay that other soldiers received who accepted early discharges during the draw-down and believes he should have been discharged in the pay grade of E-4, for the convenience of the government, with entitlement to compensation for his service. Chapter 6 of that regulation provides for barring from reenlistment individuals whose continued active duty is not in the best interest of the military service. It states, in...