| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a General Discharge (GD).
APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of his court-martial, his defense counsel never raised the issues of “post-Vietnam syndrome, insomnia, and depression.” In support, he provides: a letter from the Sheriff of Wyoming County, New York, which states that the applicant does not have a criminal record and is a good citizen; a letter from his employer attesting to his steady employment record; three letters of support from relatives and friends; a personal letter; and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 February 1966. Trained as a cannoneer, he spent 1 year in Vietnam from 7 August 1966 through 6 August 1967.
The applicant’s service records reflect numerous disciplinary infractions. He accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, on 6 June 1966 for being absent without proper authority (AWOL) from 4-5 June 1966. He also accepted NJP on 22 October 1966 for failure to go to his appointed place of duty.
The applicant was convicted by three courts-martial. On 21 November 1967, he was found guilty by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 14 October 1967 to 10 November 1967, and he was sentenced to a one grade reduction to Private First Class and to forfeit $75.00 per month for 3 months. On 23 January 1968, he was again found guilty by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 24-26 November 1967 and 26 November 1967 through 17 December 1967, and he was sentenced to reduction to Private (E-1), to forfeit $68.20 per month for 3 months, and 3 months' confinement at hard labor. The convening authority suspended the 3 months' confinement; however, the suspension was vacated on 13 March 1968. On 8 June 1968, he was found guilty by a general court-martial of being AWOL from 16 February 1968 through 12 March 1968 and of escape from confinement.
Following his general court-martial conviction, he was transferred to the United States Disciplinary Barracks to serve a 1-year sentence to confinement, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge. Upon appellate review, the United States Army Board of Review affirmed the applicant's conviction and only so much of the sentence as provided for 1 year of confinement, total forfeiture, and a bad conduct discharge. On 24 January 1969, the Army Clemency and Parole Board announced that it remitted the unexecuted portion of the sentence to confinement.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11, provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence to a general court-martial or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
The Military Justice Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-209) provides, in pertinent part, that military correction boards may not disturb the finality of a conviction by court-martial.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. There is no evidence that the applicant was suffering from depression or stress caused by his service in Vietnam. Many soldiers served in Vietnam and returned to complete their periods of service without resorting to the types of misconduct that led to the applicant’s BCD.
3. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
4. The applicant’s assertion that he has been a good citizen is accepted by the Board. However, this fact is not so extraordinary as to demonstrate that the discharge is now unjust.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___fne___ ___pm __ ___rwa__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001065814 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020516 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19690129 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C11 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | 105.0000 |
| 2. | 110.0000 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005706
The applicant was discharged on 24 June 1968, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204, with a BCD. He was discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and was issued a BCD after the sentence was affirmed. A BCD is adjudged by a court-martial when it determines a Soldier should be separated under conditions of dishonor after conviction of serious offenses of a civil or military nature warranting such severe punishment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710192
APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, reconsideration of his request for an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (dismissal from service as a result of trial by general court-martial) which this Board denied on 20 April 1978. The applicant was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, to be confined at hard labor for one year, and to be reduced to private/E-1. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, including...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710192C070209
On 24 May 1968 the applicant was tried by general court-martial for two violations of the UCMJ. The applicant was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, to be confined at hard labor for one year, and to be reduced to private/E-1. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, including the seriousness of the charges for which he was court-martialed, the Board determined the applicants post service conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605314C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general court-martial conviction be set aside and that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable or, in effect, general. On 7 January 1970, the rehearing was conducted and the applicant was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 1 year and a BCD. The applicant has not demonstrated, and the record does not support, that he had a substance abuse or mental illness problem.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076235C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The military judge, considering the applicant’s service history prior to his AWOL and his 10 months service in South Vietnam, recommended that the BCD be suspended during the applicant’s period of confinement. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005287
The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to general, under honorable conditions. The applicants military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 10 August 1964, for 3 years. The Staff Judge Advocate recommended the finding of guilty be approved and found the sentence correct in law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015919
On 29 May 1968, the United States Army Board of Review, Office of The Judge Advocate General, reassessed the sentence and approved only so much as provided for a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, and forfeiture of $50 pay per month for 6 months. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 16 August 1968 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204 for conviction by a general court-martial. __William...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056960C070420
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 2 February 1968, a United States Army Board of Review found the GCM findings of guilty and sentence as approved by proper authority in the applicant’s case correct in law and fact. Further, the BCD portion of the sentence was not effected until he had been afforded all legal appeals and the findings and sentence were finally affirmed by a United States Army Board of Review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062762C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s separation orders, dated 18 October 1968, show he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for conviction by a general court-martial. The Board also determined that the applicant’s record of service was not satisfactory; therefore, the applicant is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710380
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...