Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065699C070421
Original file (2001065699C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:



         BOARD DATE: 11 APRIL 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065699

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he "was left in Frankfurt, Germany" and taken prisoner. He states he was a prisoner in "Monte Casino in Italy for 10 days" but escaped and returned to his unit. The applicant notes that he fought until the war was over, was a "T.Sgt" and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Ribbon with bronze service stars, a Silver Star, POW Medal, and a Good Conduct Medal. He states that he is now in need of medical assistance and indebted to a local hospital. He states that his financial situation is "bleak and getting worse." In support of his request he submits his self-authored statement.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were likely lost or destroyed during the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center. Information contained herein was reconstructed entirely from his court-martial record.

The applicant was inducted at Fort Bliss, Texas in October 1942. In May 1946, at the age of 24, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of being AWOL (absent without leave) from 1 October 1945 to 2 April 1946. He arrived overseas in November 1943. The applicant was a member of an infantry unit located in Tarvisio, Italy when he was reported as AWOL. He was subsequently "apprehended about 300 miles" from his unit, "in the Province of Brescia, where he had been living almost continuously" during his period of absence. During his absence he married an Italian national.

During the applicant's court-martial he did not call any witnesses and "Evidence for the Defense" notes that he had "earned the Good Conduct Medal, three Battle Stars, the Bronze Star and the Combat Infantryman's Badge." It also noted that the applicant "was slightly wounded on four occasions but never reported his wounds because he did not wish to leave his company."

His sentence included a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and five years confinement.

In November 1946 2 years of the applicant's confinement was remitted. His dishonorable discharged was effective 21 November 1946.

Army Regulation 635-200, which currently establishes the policies and provisions for the separation of enlisted soldiers, states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant's discharge was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

2. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicant’s service during World War II, and current need for medical and financial assistance, none of these factors, either individually or in sum, warrant the relief requested.

3. The applicant has presented no evidence that there were any mitigating factors that would excuse, or justify, his more than 6 months of lost time, in an overseas theater of operations.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

5. The actions by the Army in this case were proper, and there is no doubt to be resolved in favor of the applicant.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

__ __ __ __ _ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __EJA _ __RTD__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065699
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020411
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 105.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056293C070420

    Original file (2001056293C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Accidental injuries, even though they may occur in a combat zone, that are not directly attributable to an act of the enemy, are not considered wounds received in action and do not entitle the individual to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058695C070421

    Original file (2001058695C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM’s records to show that he was captured by the German Army near Grantorto, Italy, and held as a prisoner of war from 28 April to 2 May 1945. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Prisoner of War Medal and correction of his records to show this award. Since current regulations require discharge documents to show prisoner of war status, the Board determined that, based on these current...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058659C070421

    Original file (2001058659C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his military record omits the facts regarding his capture by German soldiers and prisoner of war status during World War II. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Prisoner of War Medal and correction of his records to show this award. Since current regulations require discharge documents to show prisoner of war status, the Board determined that, based on these current standards, it is appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show his prisoner of war status.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058691C070421

    Original file (2001058691C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the absence of evidence of record to show the applicant was a prisoner of war, this affidavit prepared over 55 years after the event in question is not by itself sufficient as a basis for award of the Prisoner of War Medal in this specific case. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Prisoner of War Medal and correction of his records to show this award. Since current regulations require discharge documents to show prisoner of war status, the Board determined that, based on these...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058694C070421

    Original file (2001058694C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his military record omits the facts regarding his capture by German soldiers and prisoner of war status during World War II. The applicant’s records do not show that he was a prisoner of war. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Prisoner of War Medal and correction of his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058682C070421

    Original file (2001058682C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records do not show that he was a prisoner of war and there is no indication that the applicant ever received the Prisoner of War Medal. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Prisoner of War Medal and correction of his records to show that he was a prisoner of war. The applicant completed over one year of “Continental Service”; therefore, he is entitled to award of the American Campaign Medal and correction of his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058696C070421

    Original file (2001058696C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board noted that the applicant applied to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 19 April 1991 wherein he requested correction of his records to show that he was a prisoner of war. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Prisoner of War Medal and correction of his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093296C070212

    Original file (03093296C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Service Record (WD AGO Form 24) indicates that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge per Headquarters, 141st Infantry Regiment General Order Number 5, dated 11 February 1944. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058658C070421

    Original file (2001058658C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his military record omits the facts regarding his capture and prisoner of war status. The applicant’s records contain a Proceeding of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, dated 3 November 1993, which considered the same request submitted to this Board in an application, dated 23 May 2001. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (First Oak...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077102C070215

    Original file (2002077102C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to reflect a promotion from staff sergeant to technical sergeant based on prisoner of war (POW) status. The entry "14 Feb 44 Italy" in the Wounds Received in Action of the applicant's WD AGO 53-55 is evidence that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and to have his records corrected to reflect the award. In reviewing his case it was noted that he should be awarded the Bronze Star Medal based on his award of the Combat Infantryman...