Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was wounded in action.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in action while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He claims that his unit had crossed over into Cambodia and was caught in an ambush. He claims that he was hit by shrapnel in the leg and groin area and lost the use of his testicle and never was awarded the Purple Heart for this wound. Finally, he indicates that his mother had all his military papers and did not return them to him until 1999, and it was not until then that he discovered the error in his record.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 20 August 1969, he was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years. He successfully completed training, was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS)
11B (Infantryman) and he was assigned to the RVN for his first permanent duty station.
5. On 20 January 1970, he arrived in the RVN and on 23 January 1970 he was further assigned to A Company, 7th Support Battalion, 199th Light Infantry Brigade. On 2 February 1970, he was reassigned to B Company, 5th Battalion, 12th Infantry, 199th Light Infantry Brigade; and on 15 September 1970, he was reassigned to A Company, 2nd Battalion (Airmobile), 502nd Infantry Regiment, where he served until departing the RVN on 11 December 1970.
6. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record
(DA Form 20) confirms that on 16 May 1970, he received fragmentation wounds to his arm and groin area that resulted in the loss of 50 percent use of his right testicle.
7. The entry in item 40 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 is supported by a casualty report message on file in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ). This message confirms that he was wounded in action on 16 May 1970, when he received a fragmentation wound to the right groin area during a firefight with a hostile force, while serving as a private first class on a combat operation in Cambodia. It also verifies that he was treated for this wound at the
93d Evacuation Hospital, RVN. The MPRJ also contains a copy of General Order (GO) Number (#) 977, dated 13 September 1970, published by the 199th Infantry Brigade, RVN, that awarded the applicant the Purple Heart (PH) based on this incident.
8. The applicant’s MPRJ also contains a copy of GO # 2946, dated 3 July 1970, published by Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam, which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), for meritorious achievement based on action between 20 January and 19 June 1970. In addition, his record contains no indication that he committed any infractions that would have disqualified him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) or that he was ever disqualified for this award by any of his unit commanders.
9. On 11 December 1970, the applicant departed the RVN and was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas, where he arrived for duty on 20 January 1971, and served until being honorably separated on 19 August 1971. The separation document (DD Form 214), issued to and authenticated by the applicant on the date of his separation, confirms that he was honorably released from active duty on
19 August 1971. This document also shows that at the time of separation, he had completed a total of 2 years of active military service and that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 at the expiration of his term of service.
10. The DD Form 214 also lists the following awards earned by the applicant during his active duty tenure: National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service medal with 2 bronze service stars; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; Combat Infantryman Badge; Bronze Star Medal; and Expert Marksmanship Badge (M-16 Rifle and M-60 Machine Gun). The PH, ARCOM, and AGCM are not included in the list of awards contained in this separation document.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Chapter 4 prescribes the policy for award of the AGCM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for periods of honorable service and that it is the immediate commander’s decision to award the AGCM. Although award of the AGCM is not automatic, current policy requires that a specific disqualification be on file to deny the award. The regulation stipulates that, in the case of the first award only, a period of 1 or more years is a qualifying period for the AGCM if it is awarded at the termination of a period of active service.
12. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides guidance on establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It confirms that units with which the applicant served earned the following awards during his tenure of assignment: Valorous Unit Award, for the period 1 May through 29 June 1970, as authorized in Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 43, issued in 1972; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms that on 16 May 1970, while assigned to the RVN and on a combat operation in Cambodia, the applicant was wounded in action; and as a result, he was awarded the PH.
2. Although the applicant’s being wounded in action is well documented in his record, the PH he received was erroneously omitted from the list of awards contained in his separation document. In addition, an ARCOM he earned was also excluded from the list of awards in his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board finds it would be appropriate to add these awards to his separation document at this time.
3. In addition, the record verifies that the applicant completed 2 years of honorable active military service from 20 August 1969 through 19 August 1971. Lacking a disqualification from any of his unit commanders and the absence of any derogatory information that would preclude him from receiving the award, the Board concludes his service satisfies the qualifying period criteria necessary to be awarded the first award of the AGCM. Thus, it concludes that it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM at this time.
4. The record also confirms that based on his unit service in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the following unit awards: Valorous Unit Award; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Thus, the Board also finds it would be in the interest of justice to add these awards to his records at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable service from 20 August 1969 through 19 August 1971; by adding the Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal, Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, to the list of awards already contained in his separation document; and by providing him a corrected separation document that includes these changes.
BOARD VOTE:
__AAO__ _ _MHM__ __KAH GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Arthur A. Omartian__
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2001065619 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/29 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1971/08/19 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C2 |
DISCHARGE REASON | ETS |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015 |
2. 46 | 107.0000 |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008388
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 March 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050008388 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 September 1969 through 4 June 1970. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901
The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with V Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017976C070206
William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 18 December 1969, and as a result, he was awarded the PH by proper authority.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101955C070208
It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, it is necessary to have evidence confirming the member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound by military medical personnel and this record of treatment must have been made a matter official record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067839C070402
By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for being wounded in action, while serving as a SGT/E-5 in the RVN, on 18 February 1970;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019340
Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award the applicant the PH for wounds sustained in action in the RVN on 13 May 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080261C070215
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. During its...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012000C080407
The evidence of record contains orders confirming the applicant was awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 19 September 1970. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 1 July 1969 through 26 May 1971. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103960C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004103960 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. The applicant’s provides no confirmation that he was ever wounded or in action or recommended for or awarded...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012592
The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 8 January 1971 through 19 December 1971. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that wound for which the award is being was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army...