| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, he asks for mercy, which would allow him to work as a street vendor in New York. He claims that his discharge must be upgraded in order for him to obtain a license to do this job. He indicates that his first term of service was outstanding and he was promoted to sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5) in less than two years, and he was placed on the promotion list to staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6) in less than 3 years.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He served on active duty for 2 years, 11 months, and 26 days, from 5 November 1975 through 30 October 1978, at which time he was honorably separated. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to him for this period of service confirms that he held the rank of SGT/E-5 and the military occupational specialty of 36K (Lineman) on the date of his separation. His record reveals that during his first period of service, he earned no awards, with the exception of an Expert Marksmanship Badge (Rifle & Grenade), and it documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition.
The applicant reenlisted in the Army and on 9 October 1980, he reentered active duty on the enlistment under review as a SGT/E-5. He was assigned to Fort Ord, California, where he served until 1982. He was reassigned to Germany and arrived there on 21 February 1982.
The applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition for the period of service under review. However, it does contain an extensive absent without leave (AWOL) related disciplinary history, which includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) in July 1982, and the special court-martial (SPCM) trial and conviction in February 1983, which resulted in his BCD.
On 9 February 1993, the applicant was found guilty of three specifications of AWOL and one specification of escaping lawful custody by a SPCM. The resultant sentence included a reduction to private/E-1, a forfeiture of $300
per month for 3 months, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, and a BCD.
On 4 March 1983, the applicant’s SPCM was promulgated in SPCM Order Number 025, published by Department of the Army (DA), Headquarters,
1st Armored Division, in which the convening authority approved the sentence.
On 13 September 1983, the United States Army Court of Military Review, based on a review of the entire record, found that the approved findings and sentence in the applicant’s case were correct in law and fact, and they were finally affirmed.
SPCM Order Number 807, dated 14 December 1983, published by the United States Army Correctional Activity, Fort Riley, Kansas, remitted the remaining portion of the confinement sentence and ordered the remaining unexecuted portion of the sentence, specifically the BCD portion, duly executed.
On 6 January 1984, the applicant was discharged accordingly after completing
2 years, 7 months, and 9 days of his current enlistment and a total of 5 years,
7 months, and 5 days of creditable active military service and having accrued a total of 229 days of time lost due to AWOL and confinement.
There is no indication that the applicant requested an upgrade of his discharge from the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15 year statute of limitations.
Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 as amended does not permit any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction and empowers the Board to only change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded in order for him to receive a license for employment. However, it finds this factor alone is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. The evidence of record clearly shows, and the Board is satisfied, that the applicant was afforded every legal right in connection with the SPCM proceedings against him and that his trial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses for which he was charged.
3. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s SPCM conviction and the resultant BCD were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time. Further, the BCD portion of the sentence was not effected until he had been afforded all legal appeals and the findings and sentence were finally affirmed by the United States Army Court of Military Review.
4. By law, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
5. The Board carefully reviewed and considered the applicant’s prior period of honorable service. However, it finds that even when considering this honorable period of service, his overall record of service is not sufficiently distinguished to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in his BCD.
6. Based on the seriousness of the offenses for which the applicant was convicted during the enlistment under review, the Board concludes that the resultant BCD was an appropriate punishment. Even after considering the applicant’s issue and his overall record of service, in view of the facts of this case, the Board still concludes that clemency is not warranted.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__CLA__ __BJE__ __DPH___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001065553 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/13 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1984/01/06 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | SPCM, AR 635-200, C3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Court-Martial |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 665 | 144.6800 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006693
She states, in effect, the following is a chronological account of the events that transpired during the time she was charged: a. while she was serving in military occupational specialty 75C (Personnel Management Specialist) in the Levy Section at Fort Hood, TX, a Soldier asked if his orders could be amended or deleted. She was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a BCD. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014496
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 9 August 1979. Therefore, given his extensive record of misconduct, his undistinguished service record, and the severity of the offenses for which he was convicted, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support clemency in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059696C070421
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 2 December 1982, the applicant petitioned for a grant of review in the United States Court of Military Appeals. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005733
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086396C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Therefore, it finds there is an insufficient basis to grant clemency in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001984
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 8 May 1987, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008383
The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 February 1977 and continued to serve until he was honorably discharged in the rank of specialist four (SP4) on 5 November 1979. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant's conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the final discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006406
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by the U.S. Army Court of Military Review. The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 July 1978, and he cited his DOB as 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091652C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 31 January 1984, the United States Army Court of Military Review upon consideration of the entire record of the special court-martial, including consideration of the issues specified by the appellant, held that the findings of guilty and the sentence as approved by the convening authority were correct in law and fact. There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002366C070206
Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 6 June 1995, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined that the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and it voted to deny the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's...