| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided, that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve and that her entitlement to Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments be reinstated.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that she was discharged from the USAR without her knowledge, due to being twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC). She goes on to state that she is a VSI annuitant and upon her relocation in August 1998, she provided a new address to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). She goes on to state that she did not receive the notice of her nonselection and was not expecting such a notice. However, because she did not respond to the notice and make an election to be transferred to the Retired Reserve, she was discharged. She also has not received a copy of her discharge order. Inasmuch as she must remain affiliated with the Reserve Components in order to receive her VSI annuity, she desires to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 16 September 1992, while serving in the Regular Army in the rank of major, she was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-100 and the Voluntary Separation Incentives Program (VSIP). She had served 11 years, 9 months and 16 days of total active service and was authorized VSI annuity payments of $12,826.77 for 23 years. She accepted a USAR commission and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).
5. In the processing of this case a staff member of the Board contacted officials at the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) to ascertain the applicant’s status. Officials at the ARPERSCOM indicated that the applicant was twice nonselected for promotion to LTC and a notice of her nonselection as well as an option election statement was dispatched to her last known address. It was returned as undeliverable and she was discharged on 21 May 1999.
6. Army policy and Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual (DoDPM), based on Public Law 102-190, 5 December 1991, as amended, prescribes the qualifications for entitlement to readjustment benefits for certain voluntarily separated members. The VSI was one of the monetary benefits associated with this incentive program.
7. The Voluntary Incentive Program was designed to support the Army’s drawdown. Headquarters, Department of the Army (DA) Message 281802Z, dated in January 1992, clarified issues associated with the voluntary separation incentive program via a question and answer format. It stated, that soldiers approved for VSI would be paid in annual installments commencing on their departure date from active duty, and on each anniversary date thereafter for twice the number of years on active duty, provided the soldier continues to serve in the Ready Reserve. It also stipulated that VSI annual payments would be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve.
8. Army Regulation 135-175 provides the policies governing the separation of Reserve officers. It provides, in pertinent part, that a Reserve officer who is twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of LTC by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve, if requested by the individual.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s discharge from the USAR on 21 May 1999 was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations, when her option election form was returned as undeliverable.
2. While the Board recognizes that it is and was the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that ARPERSCOM officials were aware of her current address at all times, the Board finds that under the circumstances, additional efforts should have been made to advise the applicant on the effects that a discharge would have on her VSI entitlements.
3. The Board also finds it unreasonable to believe that the applicant would have elected to be discharged, since such an action would terminate her entitlements to VSI payments. Accordingly, it is reasonable to presume that she would have elected transfer to the Retired Reserve.
4. The Board concludes, in view of the circumstances, and in the interest of justice, that her 21 May 1999 discharge from the USAR should be voided, that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve, and that her VSI payments be resumed.
5. In addition, the Board finds that it would be appropriate to provide the applicant any annual VSI payments, which were lost as a result of her discharge from the USAR, retroactively.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 21 May 1999 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned, that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to annual VSI payments and that she be paid all VSI payments that she missed as a result of her discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
__wtm___ ___rks __ ___clg __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Walter T. Morrison____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001064689 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1999/05/21 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR135-155 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | PASSOVER |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 335 | 135.0300/CHG STATUS |
| 2. 291 | 128.0800/SEV PAY (VSI) |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010390
The applicant requests back payment, reinstatement, and continuance of Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty on 1 August 1993 and authorized VSI payment for 20 years (until August 2013). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made an MSO election, electing to remain in the Individual Ready...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078691C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be placed in the Retired Reserve to allow for continued payment of his earned Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) benefits. The form he received contained no explanation that he would forfeit VSI benefits as a result of being discharged or that he had the option to transfer to the Retired Reserve and continue to receive annual VSI payments. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509392C070209
The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, inasmuch as he separated from active duty under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program (VSIP), he is obligated to remain in the USAR in some capacity as a condition of receiving his annual VSI payments. Although it is a requirement for USAR soldiers to request transfer to the Retired Reserve or another USAR Control Group in lieu of being...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060662C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his 14 January 2000 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided, that his payments under the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) be continued and that he be paid all back payments that he should have received had he not been involuntarily discharged. Although officials at the ARPERSCOM indicate that the applicant submitted a resignation, the applicant denies having done so and the ARPERSCOM has been unable to provide any...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079072C070215
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier appeal to have his discharge voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to prior and future Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments. She indicated that after her separation from the applicant in December 1999, she was responsible for forwarding the applicant's mail to his new address. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104751C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his transfer to the Retired Reserve be voided and that he be placed back into the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) to allow for continued payment of his earned Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) benefits. On 20 May 1995, the applicant reenlisted in the USAR for six years and on 19 May 2001, he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074873C070403
In this opinion, personnel officials indicated that there were no provisions in the applicable law and regulations that would allow for the applicant to remain in an active USAR status subsequent to his having been twice non-selected for promotion to LTC. It further indicated that the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve in order to allow him to continue to receive VSI payments only with no additional benefits authorized. In order for the Board to grant the exception to policy...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085504C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be allowed to reenlist in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in order to receive the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments he was authorized upon his separation from active duty. It further indicates that the applicant is a VSI recipient and if he is not allowed to enlist with a subsequent reenlistment in the USAR, he will lose his remaining VSI payments because the governing law requires USAR membership to be eligible for the VSI...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064180C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his 20 September 2000 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided, that his payments under the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) be continued and that he be paid all back payments that he should have received had he not been discharged. Although officials at the ARPERSCOM indicate that the applicant submitted a resignation, the applicant contends that he did so based on the advice he received from those officials at the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068816C070402
Orders Number 018-010, dated 18 January 2001, issued by the Military Department of Indiana, directs that the applicant be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve member of the Army, effective 18 December 2000. Further, the Board finds an unintentional injustice was served upon the applicant as a result of her never being properly counseled on the service remaining requirement for her to be transferred to the USAR, and because she was never afforded the opportunity to take the necessary...