Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064620C070421
Original file (2001064620C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 5 March 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064620

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her medical discharge with severance pay be corrected to a medical retirement.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that she was not aware of what the options were for medically unfit soldiers. If she had known what her options were, she would have been able to present her case more effectively.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

She enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 January 1983, was awarded the military occupational specialty of fuel and electrical systems repairer, and was placed in a patient status immediately following her advanced individual training.

On 31 August 1983 a medical evaluation board (MEB) was convened which determined that the applicant suffered from major depression, acute, severe, treated, improved, in relative full remission. The applicant also had been treated for self-inflicted burns to her right hand. The MEB stated that the applicant had a poorly documented history of treatment for depression following her mother’s death, prior to her entry in the Army. The MEB referred the applicant to a physical evaluation board (PEB).

On 16 September 1983 a PEB convened and determined that the applicant was physically unfit due to major depression, in full remission, slight impairment for social and industrial adaptability, and recommended that she be discharged with severance pay. The PEB considered the applicant’s burn and determined that it was not unfitting. The applicant concurred with those findings and recommendation and waived a formal hearing.

The PEB’s recommendation was approved and the applicant was honorably discharged on 24 October 1983 due to physical unfitness with severance pay.

Army Regulation 635-40 provides that those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a PEB to determine whether they are physically unfit to perform their duties and if found unfit, to determine the percentage of disability to be awarded. This regulation also provides that only unfitting conditions or defects and those which contribute to unfitness will be considered in arriving at the rated degree of incapacity warranting retirement or separation for disability.

Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.

Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation with severance pay of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant has not submitted any evidence or argument which would indicate that the finding of the MEB and PEB, that her depression was controlled by medication and in remission, was in error. Without something which would show that the MEB and PEB’s findings were in error, the Board must presume that the PEB’s recommendation, that the applicant be discharged with severance pay, was appropriate.

2. If the applicant’s depression has worsened since her discharge, she should seek assistance with the Department of Veterans Affairs.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___fne___ ___tbr __ ___dph__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064620
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020305
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02997

    Original file (BC-2004-02997.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02997 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 MARCH 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code of “JFL” and reenlistment eligibility (RE) of “2Q” be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist. The MEB recommended referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075977C070403

    Original file (2002075977C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that her records be corrected to show retirement because of physical disability with a 95 percent disability rating in the grade of lieutenant colonel. The applicant’s records, to include those that she herself completed and signed, dating from June 1981 to the date that she was permanently retired, show that she used her married surname even after her 1982 divorce. The evidence also suggests that she did not concur in a PEB finding to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012318C070206

    Original file (20050012318C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 November 2002 an informal PEB concluded the applicant’s low back pain precluded performance of his military duties and recommended separation with a 10 percent disability rating. The applicant was discharged from the United States Army Reserve on 14 May 2003 with a disability rating of 20 percent. A May 2005 medical summary noted his Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease and chronic low back pain were both presently stable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009918

    Original file (20130009918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 August 1995, an informal PEB convened and found the applicant's condition prevented her from performing the duties required of her grade and military specialty and determined that she was physically unfit due to Major Depression, recurrent, treated, partially improved, manifested by depressed mood, tearfulness, insomnia, and suicidal ideation. The PEB considered her other conditions but found them not to be unfitting and therefore not rated. The PEB rated her Major Depression...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511257C070209

    Original file (9511257C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: He was rated for classic migraine headaches. If an EPTS condition is not aggravated by military service, the finding will be not in line of duty, EPTS. If the PEB determines that an individual is physically unfit, it recommends the percentage of disability to be awarded which, in turn, determines whether an individual will be discharged with severance pay or retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058513C070421

    Original file (2001058513C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The report indicated that the applicant was administered various tests, which indicated that she had a few anxiety symptoms but was not depressed or experiencing other symptoms of PTSD. The psychologist stated that the applicant did not currently meet criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD or anxiety disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010266

    Original file (20090010266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further included a copy of a Report of Medical Board at the Naval Medical Center, San Diego, dated 12 May 2005, which shows a diagnosis of chronic PTSD; major depression; and healing third degree burns on all extremities, face and scalp, and diabetes. The TDRL approving authority reviewed the applicant’s comments and concurred with the TDRL findings on 7 January 2008; d. on 10 January 2008, an informal PEB found the applicant unfit for a variety of conditions and rated him at 80% and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD 2010 00402

    Original file (PD 2010 00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was placed on limited duty and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The PEB adjudged the major depression condition as an unfitting “ overall effect” condition, without applying a VA diagnostic code. Considering the hospitalization, noted symptoms, intensive treatment, and significant lost duty time due to the CI’s mental disorder, and in consideration of the totality of the evidence, the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard was adequately met to adjudge the major...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016515

    Original file (20110016515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record shows the PEB determined the applicant was unfit for further service and granted her a 20 percent disability rating. The applicant’s complete service medical records were not available for review in this case; however, contrary to her contention that she was diagnosed as bi-polar with PTSD and manic depression, the available evidence of record shows she was found to have an atypical depressive disorder. The existing evidence of record and the independent evidence provided by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021583

    Original file (20130021583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that – * her dismissal be vacated * her Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosis of depression be changed to a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) * she be afforded a military disability rating and service connection for PTSD 2. The applicant states, in effect – * an MEB/Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) was in process, but due to her administrative discharge it was not completed * she disagree with the MEB/PEB's indication that her depression existed...