| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be paid proficiency pay for the period 21 May through 31 August 1999.
3. The applicant states that he performed the duties of AGR-FTM (Army Guard/Reserve-Full Time Manning) recruiter during the period in question and has not received the proficiency pay to which he is entitled.
4. The applicant’s available military records show that during the period 21 May through 31 August 1999, he performed the duties of military occupational specialty 79T (Reserve Recruiting Noncommissioned Officer) in the AGR Program for the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG).
5. On 11 June 1999, the MDARNG published Orders 090-110 MD-STRAC-ARP (Corrected Copy) announcing the award of proficiency pay to the applicant effective 21 May 1999. This corrected copy does not identify the correction made.
6. On 26 August 1999, the MDARNG published Orders 132-041 MD-STARC-ARP announcing the voluntary separation at the individual’s request of the applicant effective 31 August 1999, based on voluntary early release in the best interest of the Government.
7. On 31 August 1999, the applicant was released from his AGR status only and returned to his MDARNG traditional soldier status effective 1 September 1999. His separation document shows he completed 8 months of active duty.
8. On 21 November 2000, his unit commander completed a DD Form 114 (Military Pay Order) in an attempt to have the individual paid for the period 21 May through 31 August 1999.
9. On 14 June 2001, a claims examiner in the Directorate of Debt and Claims Management, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Denver Center, returned the claim to the applicant’s commander indicating that no action would be taken based on the effective date of the entitlement being prior to the date of the orders that authorized the entitlement.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant’s entitlement to proficiency pay for the period 21 May through 31 August 1999.
2. Although the MDARNG failed to properly document this entitlement, the individual concerned should not be penalized for their errors.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned is entitled to AGR-FTM recruiting proficiency pay for the period 21 May through 31 August 1999.
BOARD VOTE:
_GJW____ _HOF___ _JLP___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Jennifer L. Prater
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001064615 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020723 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077917C070215
In support of this request the applicant submits a copy of the Board’s 7 May 2002 denial, a copy of a 26 January 1981 memorandum from the Oklahoma Military Department converting FTM personnel to AGR status, orders 53-13 dated 18 March 1982 assigning him to “paragraph 108, Line 02” with the 1120 th Maintenance Company, orders 114-12 dated 14 June 1982 attaching him to the 2120 th Supply and Services activity, orders 114-13 dated 14 June 1982 slotting him in “paragraph 037, line 02” with the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015179
The JFTR states that when Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers are ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH rate is based on the primary residence location at the time the Soldier was ordered to active duty. However, if the member is called or ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH/OHA rate is based (paid) on the primary residence location at the time called/ordered to active duty"; and c. there is no distinction made in the PPG or JFTR for AGR BAH when the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004737
He stated: a. he is a Title 32 AGR Soldier mobilized in support of overseas contingency operations, and requests a Secretarial BAH waiver based upon his previously approved exception to policy to receive BAH at his last duty station of (Adelphi, MD, 20783) due to his command directed No/Low cost move, effective 21 April 2011, to a unit mobilizing within 12 months of his assignment on 30 August 2011; b. effective 21 April 2011, he was transferred to HHC, 29th Combat Aviation Brigade, Edgewood...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063763C070421
The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC) (Retired). On 4 September 1993, the applicant was placed on the retired list. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was promoted to LTC effective on 1 September 1978, with the same date of rank.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001057
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * on 14 September 2006, he was commissioned in the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG) and signed an OAB Addendum * he decided to make the Army his career after serving nearly 3 years with the Guard, serving one combat tour in Iraq, and 18 months on active duty * he attempted to acquire an Active Guard Reserve or technician position within the MDARNG for several months;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017174C070206
In addition, due to the fact that the applicant was not assigned to either the MDARNG or the WIARNG on 17 August 2004, neither headquarters had the authority to promote him on that date. In the advisory opinion the official indicates that the applicant became eligible for promotion to 1LT on 17 August 2004 and adds, in effect, for reasons that can not be determined, the applicant was not promoted when he became eligible for promotion to 1LT. The evidence of records shows that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060098C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: It states, in pertinent part, that retired soldiers are entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade they held and in which they satisfactorily served on active duty, as determined by the Secretary of the Army, when their active service plus service on the retired list totals 30 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062371C070421
The ROPMA provides that in order to be eligible for promotion to major the MTIG is 7 years as a captain, and that an officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date that he/she completed the maximum service. Promotion to major required 7 years time in grade; therefore, based on his date of rank of 1 July 1991 to captain, his promotion eligibility date was 30 June 1998. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03760
According to the FY 2013 ANG ARP Policy, paragraph 2.1.7, each aviator must: Be eligible for at least two continuous years of full time duty upon acceptance of an ARP Agreement." We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; and note the Air Force office of primary responsibilitys recommendation to grant the applicants request because the release of the FY 2013 ARP Policy was delayed until 7 June 2013. Exhibit G. Letters, Secretary of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00475
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00475 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) contract be changed to reflect he is on a four-year Air Guard Reserve (AGR) tour. Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become the...