| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia, and had surgery performed on his right knee. He further states that before it was completely healed, he was ordered to go back to duty and to jump school. He went absent without leave (AWOL) and returned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 6 to 7 months later. He goes on to state that after about 2 months he was discharged without being given an opportunity to continue to serve.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in St. Louis, Missouri on 16 August 1968, for a period of 2 years and airborne training. He completed his basic combat training at Fort Leonard Wood and was transferred to Fort Gordon, Georgia, on 12 August 1968, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as an infantryman.
On 15 November 1968, he was diagnosed as having a cyst of the lateral meniscus of the right knee. He underwent orthopedic surgery on 28 November 1968, to remove the cyst. He was placed on convalescent leave from 6 December to 15 December 1968. However, the applicant failed to return on 16 December 1968, as ordered and was reported as AWOL. He remained absent until he was returned to military control at Fort Leonard Wood on 20 April 1970.
The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214), signed by the applicant, which shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 30 June 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, for misconduct based on a prolonged absence of more than 1 year (Desertion). He had served 6 months and 18 days of total active service, was still in a trainee status, and had 483 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct. It provided, in pertinent part, that members would be processed for separation for under that regulation for misconduct, AWOL, Desertion, fraudulent entry and conviction by civil authorities. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200, currently in effect, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, desertion or AWOL. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no violations or procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
3. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore, were appropriate considering all of the available facts of the case.
4. The applicant’s contentions and supporting statements have been noted by the Board. However, given the seriousness of his offense and his otherwise undistinguished record of service, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jm___ ___rvo __ __cla ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001064446 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20002/02/28 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1970/06/30 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-206 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | MISCONDUCT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 626 | 144.6000/A60.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022760
On 30 October 1970, counsel notified him that the commander was submitting a recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations-Discharge-Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, AWOL, Desertion), due to being AWOL. On 10 November 1970, the commander (Trainee Personnel Section) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, recommended him for separation under the provisions of paragraph 46a of Army Regulation 635-206 (Misconduct -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013857
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to at least a general discharge. The applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Misconduct) for misconduct based on his prolonged unauthorized absence of more than 1 year (desertion). On 23 July 1971, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067372C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005061
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 October 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005061 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. After reviewing the facts of his case the board found that he should be discharged for misconduct and recommended that he be issued an undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050016051C070206
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 26 August 1971, NJP was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order from a superior commissioned officer to perform his extra duty. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019490
On 11 May 1974, the applicant submitted a DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge or Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) requesting upgrade of the character of service of his discharge. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army when he was 16 years of age. There is also no evidence of record of any documented unfitting medical condition(s).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072143C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. She states that she was discharged without being compensated, and that she was never given a separation physical before she was discharged. On 13 February 2001 the VA granted her a 30 percent service connected disability rating for pyelolithotomy, effective 16 May 2000.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707137
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008354
His service record shows he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 2 April 1968 to 30 October 1969. b. Paragraph 3-7b states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. He was also AWOL from 3 to 7 March 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061636C070421
NJP was imposed against him at Fort Leonard Wood on 6 November 1972 and his punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay and restriction. Inasmuch as his records were at Fort Hood and they were not notified until much later, the applicant’s records continued to contain the documents and entries indicating that he had been dropped from the rolls. The Board has also reviewed the applicant’s record in regards to his desire to be awarded the GCMDL.