Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064315C070421
Original file (2001064315C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 15 January 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064315

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

APPLICANT STATES: That by error and/or oversight, the personnel responsible for briefing the FSM failed in their responsibility and he did not complete the Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. She and the FSM were married for 38 years. She was part of the Family Guard until his death in July 2001. Moreover, he died with the conviction that she would be covered by the RCSBP. This is the only source of income she will have until she is eligible for social security in 4 years.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel makes no additional contention.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He was born on 20 July 1942. He and the applicant married on 28 December 1963. He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 2 February 1969. He was promoted to Master Sergeant, E-8 on 15 August 1983.

The FSM’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 30 October 1984. The letter indicates that a Survivor Benefit Plan Summary was attached as an enclosure. He apparently failed to return an RCSBP election form.

The FSM was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 8 July 1990 and to the Retired Reserve on 15 May 1993.

The FSM died on 23 July 2001.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The FSM was a senior noncommissioned officer. His 20-year letter clearly stated that a Survivor Benefit Plan Summary was attached. If he desired to enroll in the RCSBP and provide RSCBP coverage to the applicant, it was his responsibility to seek out the information he needed to provide that coverage. Like a civilian insurance plan, he would have had to complete a form (a DD Form 1883) designating a beneficiary at what level of coverage (maximum or reduced) and at what time (immediate coverage or delayed coverage). There is no evidence to show that he did so. The Board finds it difficult to conceive that a senior noncommissioned officer could have believed he provided such coverage to the applicant when he had not completed any such document.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__inw___ __hof___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064315
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090355C070212

    Original file (2003090355C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It appears he was not married at that time and, by failing to return the DD Form 1883, did not make an RCSBP election. The FSM and the applicant married in 1998. In the absence of substantiating evidence (i.e., the DD Form 1883) it does not appear that failure to grant the applicant’s requested relief would be inequitable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002790C070206

    Original file (20050002790C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883. The FSM's 20-year letter was issued in 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069754C070402

    Original file (2002069754C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The applicant was married to the FSM for over 20 years of his military career. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the RCSBP retroactive to the date of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062393C070421

    Original file (2001062393C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage, option C. She states that it was the FSM’s understanding that when he reached age 60 she would receive his benefits. The evidence of record shows the FSM failed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076772C070215

    Original file (2002076772C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for former spouse coverage. On 10 August 1992, he completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. He named the applicant as his spouse and indicated they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067152C070402

    Original file (2002067152C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of his deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for option C. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004957

    Original file (20130004957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's records to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) with spouse coverage. She applied for the survivor annuity and was told that a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Certificate) was not on file in the FSM's military records. The applicant contends that the records of her deceased husband should be corrected to show he enrolled in the RCSBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056150C070420

    Original file (2001056150C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). While the Board cannot change the date of the FSM’s death, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he enrolled in the RCSBP on 1 July 1979 for spouse coverage, full base amount, option C. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013725C070206

    Original file (20050013725C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015385C070206

    Original file (20050015385C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a supplemental letter; a memorandum from a commanding officer at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; a DD Form 1884 (Application For Annuity Under The Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) and/or SBP); a Direct Deposit Sign-up Form; the FSM' s Certificate of Death; her Form W-4P (Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments); the FSM's reassignment orders to the Retired Reserve; the FSM's 20-Year Letter; the FSM's Chronological Statement of...