Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his 2 February 2001, discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided, that he be placed on the Retired List effective 30 January 1993, and that his records be corrected to show that he was not eligible for promotion or twice non-selected for promotion to the rank of major.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his goal after completing his service obligation was to remain eligible for recall if needed, but not compete for promotion. He continues by stating that he never intended to be kept in a status where he would be considered for promotion and he never completed or attempted to complete any of the requirements necessary to compete for promotion. Accordingly, he believes that he should have been transferred to the Retired Reserve at the end of his obligation. He goes on to state that while he was notified of his discharge on 12 January 2001, he was not aware of what it actually meant until 26 September 2001, when he attempted to join a National Guard unit in Oklahoma and was informed that because he was twice non-selected for promotion, he was unable to join an Army unit again.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted on 26 March 1985, for a period of 4 years, under the Airborne Training, Cash Enlistment Bonus and College Fund Enlistment Programs. He successfully completed his training and continued to serve on active duty until he graduated from Officer Candidate School (OCS) and was honorably discharged on 17 December 1986, for the purpose of accepting a commission in the USAR. He had served 1 year, 8 months and 22 days of total active service.
On 18 December 1986, he was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant with a concurrent call to active duty. He completed his training as a field artillery officer and was transferred to Alaska. He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 18 December 1988 and remained on active duty until 28 June 1990, when he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) for miscellaneous reasons. He had served 3 years, 6 months and 11 days of active service as a commissioned officer. He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and was promoted to the rank of captain on 17 December 1992.
At the time of his separation he gave a mailing address in Connecticut. At the time of his promotion to the rank of captain, he had a mailing address in Virginia and he currently has a mailing address in Oklahoma.
A review of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) reveals that the applicant has an excellent record of service during his tenure on active duty in both an enlisted and commissioned officer status. There is no evidence in his OMPF to show when he was discharged or the reasons for his discharge.
Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures used in the selection and promotion of commissioned officers in the National Guard and USAR. It provides, in pertinent part, that officers serving in the rank of captain will be considered by mandatory promotion selection boards to the rank of major, once they have at least 7 years time in grade and at least 12 years of commissioned service. It also provides that in order to be promoted to the rank of major in the USAR, the officer must have completed an officer advance course. An officer who is twice non-selected for promotion to the rank of major will not be considered again for promotion. The selection board action is administratively final and if removal from active Reserve status is required by law, the officer must be removed within the prescribed time limits established by law. USAR officers who are twice non-selected for promotion will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve if they are eligible and request such a transfer.
Army Regulation 140-10 provides the policies and procedures for assigning, attaching, removing and transferring USAR soldiers. It provides, in pertinent part, that assignment to the USAR Control Group (Retired) is authorized upon an individual’s request, provided the individual is entitled to receive Retired Pay from the Armed Forces because of prior military service, has completed a total of 20 years of active or inactive service in the Armed Forces, is medically disqualified for active duty resulting from a service-connected disability, or appointment was tendered on condition the soldier immediately apply for transfer to the Retired reserve, or has reached the age of 37, completed a minimum of 8 years of qualifying service, or completed 10 or more years of active Federal commissioned service, or is medically disqualified not as a result of own misconduct, for retention in an active status or entry on active duty, regardless of the total years of service completed. It also provides, in effect, that officers who have fulfilled their statutory military service obligation and have been twice non-selected for promotion to the rank of major will be removed (discharged or transferred to Retired Reserve, if eligible and applies).
Army Regulation 135-175, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the separation of commissioned officers from the Reserve Components. It provides, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier will not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. After the effective date of discharge, orders may be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.
That regulation also provides, in pertinent part, the provisions under which a USAR commission is vacated. It provides, in pertinent part, that a USAR commission is vacated (voluntarily) once a member enters into a status that is not compatible with USAR service. It may be vacated involuntarily under provisions of law and regulations for such reasons as failure to meet educational qualifications or failure to be selected for promotion.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2. Although the Board understands the applicant’s desire to return, the applicant has not submitted any evidence to show that he was eligible for and requested transfer to the Retired Reserve prior to his discharge. Inasmuch as it does not appear that he was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve, the Board finds, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that he was properly discharged from the USAR in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.
3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contention that he simply desired to remain in the USAR for recall and did not desire to compete for promotion. However, he was promoted to the rank of captain while in the USAR, which should have been an indicator to him that he was being considered for promotion, regardless of any activity he may or may not have had. Accordingly, it was incumbent upon him to determine/clarify his status if he had specific intentions in mind. Inasmuch as he was a USAR commissioned officer, the only way his USAR commission could be terminated (without his voluntary resignation) is if he accepted an appointment in the Regular Army, the National Guard, enlisted in a Reserve Component, or was promoted to a higher Reserve Grade. Therefore, once he was twice non-selected for promotion, discharge was required under the provisions of law and regulation.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__inw ___ __gjw ___ __rjw ___ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2001064206 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/03/12 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 2001/02/02 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR135-175 |
DISCHARGE REASON | 2XX NONSELECT FOR PROMOTION/MAJ |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 335 | 135.0300/CHG STATUS |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063243C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Removal of his discharge and second passover for promotion. In pertinent part, Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who twice fails to be selected for promotion to captain, major, or lieutenant colonel will not again be considered for promotion and will be removed from an active status. The Board notes that applicant’s contention that he was not notified of his first passover that would have allowed him to correct his non-promotable status; however,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018950
The applicant requests: * his retirement be rescinded * he be allowed to join the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * he be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) 2. The applicant states he was a USAR Soldier serving on active duty in an Active Guard Reserve status. In 2001, he again applied to this Board, this time requesting promotion reconsideration under the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) criteria vice the Active Duty List criteria and the Board granted his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064650C070421
The applicant requests that his discharge be changed to Retired Reserve and reinstatement of his VSI (Voluntary Separation Incentive) payments. Title 10, USC, section 14513, states that a Reserve officer of the Army, who is in an active status and whose removal from an active status or from a Reserve active-status list is required by section 14506 of this title shall: 1) be transferred to an inactive status if the Secretary concerned determines that the officer has skills which may be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009433C070208
By memorandum dated 24 September 2002, and apparently received by him on or about 10 October 2002, the applicant was notified that, even though he had not been recommended for promotion, a Selective Continuation board recommended him for continuation in his present grade. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) states that a commissioned officer vacates his Army Reserve appointment when he accepts a Regular Army appointment in a commissioned grade; accepts a promotion to a higher...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002468C070208
That command opined that the applicant’s enlistment contract should not be amended, but instead his discharge order be revoked, and a letter of notification that the applicant vacated his Reserve appointment be issued in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175, paragraph 5-1. Army Regulation 601-210 governs eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing of persons into the Regular Army and the Army Reserve, and states in effect, that in order...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080749C070215
The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 3 April 2001, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175, 2 years after his removal was required by law. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve. The applicant was separated from active duty on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013455C070205
The applicant provides a memorandum dated 22 March 2006 which shows that he was selected for promotion to major by a special selection board which considered him under 2003 criteria; a copy of this Board’s 28 June 2005 record of proceedings; a copy of his DD Form 4 enlisting him in the USAR in the rank of sergeant on 21 March 2005; and documentation pertaining to him attempting to regain his commissioned status and be promoted to major. On 28 June 2005, this Board recommended that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021577
The reason given was that the records review did not indicate he had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day before the date the board convened. e. The opinion further indicated the applicant may be eligible for a promotion reconsideration board because he provided evidence indicating he was educationally qualified at the time he was considered by the FY 2010 Captain APL promotion board. He was also not selected for promotion to captain by this board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106064C070208
Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. Army Regulation 350-100 (Officer Active Duty Service Obligations) states, in pertinent part, that officers graduating from the Special Forces Detachment Officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009121C070205
At the time of his selection for promotion to major on 5 March 1991, he was an ARNG officer. The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to major while on active duty. The applicant should have been considered for promotion to major by a mandatory Reserve promotion board one year after the date of his transfer to the IRR in 1994 and again in 1995.