| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. June Hajjar | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Member | |
| Mr. Roger Able | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry (RE) code of RE-3 be changed to RE-1.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was involuntarily held beyond his original expiration of term of service (ETS) for a medical board. He further states that on the date of his separation he had completed his full enlistment and should have received an appropriate RE code. In support of his application, he submits the following documents: separation document (DD Form 214); enlistment contract (DA Form 4); discharge orders; Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) proceedings (DA Form 3947); and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings (DA Form 199).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 16 January 1997, the applicant entered the Army for a period of 4 years and his ETS was established as 15 January 2001. He successfully completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92G (Food Service Specialist). His record shows the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist /E-4 (SPC/E-4).
On 21 December 1999, a MEB convened in Germany to evaluate the applicant’s medically diagnosed conditions of painful bilateral feet, chronic left knee pain, and moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and this resulted in the applicant being referred to a PEB.
On 29 September 2000, a PEB convened in Washington D.C. to evaluate the applicant’s fitness for duty. The PEB found the applicant physically unfit for duty and recommended a combined physical disability rating of 0 percent and that the applicant be separated by reason of physical disability with severance pay.
On 17 October 2000, the applicant was advised of the findings and recommendations of the PEB and received a full explanation of the results of the findings and recommendations and legal rights pertaining thereto. He completed and signed a PEB election form concurring with the PEB findings and waiving his right to a formal hearing of his case.
The specific facts and circumstances concerning the applicant’s retention beyond his ETS are not in the record; however, there is a properly constituted DD Form 214 on file that was issued to and authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his separation, 27 January 2001. This document confirms that the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge was
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b (3), and the narrative reason for his separation was disability with severance pay. It also verifies that the applicant was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JFL and a
RE code of RE-3.
Army Regulation 635-200 prescribes the policy and procedure for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel. Section IV provides guidance on the separation of soldiers after their ETS. Paragraph 1-26 provides the policy and procedure for retaining soldiers beyond their ETS while undergoing physical disability processing. It states, in pertinent part, that no soldier will be retained beyond their scheduled release date without their written consent. It further indicates that if a soldier elects to be released as scheduled at his or her ETS, he or she will not be eligible for separation or retirement for physical disability.
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code of JFL was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in this regulation for soldiers separating under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b(3), by reason of disability, severance pay. Additionally, Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), establishes the RE code of RE-3 as the proper reentry code to assign to soldiers separated under this authority and for this reason.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that he was involuntarily extended beyond his expiration term of service (ETS) and that on the date of his discharge he had completed his full term of his enlistment. However, it finds these factors do not provide a basis for the requested relief.
2. The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning his retention beyond ETS in order to undergo physical disability processing. However, the evidence of record does include a properly constituted DD Form 214 that confirms that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b(3), Army Regulation 635-40, for physical disability with severance pay, and the Board presumes government regularity in his separation processing.
3. Procedurally, in order to retain soldiers beyond their ETS in order for them to undergo physical disability processing, they must consent to the action in writing. Although the applicant’s consent form is not on file, there is a copy of his signed PEB election form. This document contains his written concurrence with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and his signature. Therefore, the Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the PEB process, which includes his retention beyond ETS processing.
4. Further, the evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly assigned the SPD code of JFL and the RE-3 code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations based on his being separated under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b(3), Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of physical disability with severance pay. Therefore, the Board concludes that the RE-3 code assigned the applicant was and still is appropriate and that there is no evidentiary basis for changing it at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___JH___ __KAK__ ___RA___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063891 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/05 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005556
An RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. It is a fact finding board to investigate the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the disability of Soldiers who are referred to the board; to evaluate the physical condition of the Soldier against the physical requirements of the Soldiers particular office, grade, rank or rating; to provide a full and fair hearing for the Soldier; and to make...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005013
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008257
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JFL" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (involuntarily) under chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-40 by reason of disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his RE code from 4 to 3.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012232
The MMRB also determined that the applicant's case would be forwarded to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) regardless of the MEB findings and recommendation. A Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination, dated 8 July 1985, found the applicant not qualified for further military service. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010372
The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code of "JFL" and a RE Code of "3." His DD Form 214 stated that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code JFL and a RE Code of 3. Pertinent Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019785
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code JFL is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007216
The applicant requests an upgrade of her uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004467
The applicant requests that his separation program designator (SPD) of "JFM" (Disability, Existed Prior to Service, PEB [physical evaluation board]) be corrected to the SPD "JFL" (Disability, Severance Pay). The PEB recommended the applicant be separated with severance pay if otherwise qualified. The applicant's discharge orders dated 22 July 2008 did not provide for his discharge with severance pay with a 10 percent disability rating.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017357
The PEB determined that the applicant was physically unfit for duty and recommended that he be separated with severance pay with a combined rating of zero percent. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, RE code 3 is the appropriate RE code for a Soldier separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016989
On 23 January 1997, a revised PEB Proceedings was issued and in accordance with Army Regulation 635-4040 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-22c (3), the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) modified the finding and disposition based upon the applicant's: a. personnel records indicating he was scheduled for separation from active duty for reasons other than physical disability; b. personnel and his medical records indicating he continued to...