| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and that his rank of Private First Class be restored. He states that he believes his commander overlooked awarding him the Good Conduct Medal and that he was reduced in grade as a result of "miscommunication as to when to report to Reserve duty and conflict with school and travel." He submits no evidence in support of his request.
3. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 7 May 1959. He was trained as a supply clerk and in January 1960, while assigned to the 15th Evacuation Hospital in Europe, was promoted to the temporary rank of Private First Class. His conduct and efficiency ratings while undergoing training and at his first duty assignment (Fort Lee, Virginia) were excellent.
4. In August 1960 the applicant appeared before a "Classification Board." The board was convened as a result of the applicant's less than adequate duty performance. His "section leader" noted that the applicant "had little knowledge of supply procedures" and that he made "many errors on supply forms, is negligent in safeguarding government property, and has been of little or no help to the unit supply section…." The board recommended reclassification but there is no evidence in available records that the applicant was ever reclassified or that he was reassigned from his original duty position in the supply area of the 15th Evacuation Hospital.
5. In January 1961 the applicant's servicing personnel office notified his detachment commander that the applicant was eligible for the Good Conduct Medal. Although the applicant's "efficiency rating" was initially entered as "excellent" on the form, it was subsequently lined through and written as "unsatisfactory." The detachment commander initialed the change. The detachment commander then completed the form by recommending approval of the award and indicated the applicant's conduct rating was "excellent." That portion of the form was also subsequently changed to indicate "disapproval" of the Good Conduct Medal. The change was initialed by the serving personnel officer and contains the hand written note "CO notified concurred."
6. In spite of the fact that the unit commander indicated on the Good Conduct Medal recommendation form that the applicant's efficiency was unsatisfactory, in April 1961, upon the applicant's departure from the unit, his efficiency was recorded as satisfactory in section four of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) after previous entries were lined through and initialed.
7. On 20 April 1961 the applicant was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service in the permanent rank of Private First Class. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not reflect award of the Good Conduct Medal.
8. Following the applicant's release from active duty he was initially assigned to the 21st Artillery, a USAR unit, for the purpose of completing his Reserve obligation. However, in October 1961, because of the location of his residence, he was subsequently transferred to the 382nd Ordnance Company.
9. On 10 September 1962 the applicant was reduced from pay grade E-3 to pay grade E-2 for "attendance." Orders issued by the 382nd Ordnance Company confirmed the reduction. There are no other documents associated with the reduction action in available records. In December 1962 the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training). His grade at the time of transfer was E-2.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant completed a qualifying period for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 20 April 1961 when he was released from active duty.
2. While the evidence does appear to indicate that the applicant was not recommended for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal by his detachment commander in January 1961, the information contained in the applicant's records is confusing at best. He received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings prior to being assigned to Europe and although the Good Conduct Medal document indicates an unsatisfactory efficiency rating, his official record reflects a satisfactory rating. The Board also notes that in spite of board action recommending reclassification for inefficiency there is no evidence the applicant was ever reassigned from his supply duties or reclassified.
3. There is no evidence in available records that the applicant had any disciplinary problems, he was promoted by the same unit which sought to reclassify him for inefficiency, there is no indication his commander followed through on the reclassification action, and his characterization of service upon separation was honorable. In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate and in the interest of equity to award him that decoration for the period 7 May 1959 through 20 April 1961.
4. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that his reduction to pay grade E-2 while in the USAR was in error or unjust. In absence of such evidence the Board presumes regularity and concludes that there is no basis to restore the applicant to the grade of E-3.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 May 1959 through 20 April 1961.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__INW __ __HOF__ __DPH __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ __ __ __ __ __ DENY APPLICATION
___Irene N. Wheelwright___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001063668 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020115 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | 110.00 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065706C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be amended to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B and to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, one overseas service bar, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Ribbon (RVNCM) with Device 1960, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Expert...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018123
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show his medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005599
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He served a qualifying period in Vietnam for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005599
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He served a qualifying period in Vietnam for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002236
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active enlisted service. He served a qualifying period of service and should be entitled to this award and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. His file contains no information that would have disqualified him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award); therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011784
Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout both periods of his active service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014310
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Army Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009230
He would like to have any awards or medals for his faithful service to the U.S. Army and his country, such as the Army of Occupation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon, and Rifle Badge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Army of Occupation Medal is awarded for service of thirty consecutive days at a normal post of duty in a qualifying location. Evidence of record shows that the applicant does...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001418
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant served a qualifying period of active enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from 9 July 1959 to 8 June 1961. a. c. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001143
Therefore, the preponderance of evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 9 March 1959 through 8 March 1962. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 9 March 1959 through 8 March 1962, and b. adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal *...