Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063617C070421
Original file (2001063617C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 11 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063617

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage to spouse and children coverage.

APPLICANT STATES: That in the summer of 1993, she and the FSM went down to the command office to change forms, sign papers, and to get her an identification card. The officer had all of their papers ready to sign and answered all of their questions. He put all of the signed papers in a folder and said all was done. The FSM followed every detail to bring her on board.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He was born on 6 November 1946. He served on active duty from September 1966 – August 1968 and was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve. He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 2 October 1973. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was prepared on 3 November 1992. It appears he was a widower at that time. He completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, on 6 December 1992 and elected to participate in the RCSBP for children only coverage, full base amount, option C.

The FSM and the applicant married on 2 April 1993. On 5 February 1995, he completed a Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate, SGLV-8286 and designated his two children as principal beneficiaries for his insurance. He was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 October 1995. He died on 7 September 2001.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60
whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married or has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP. Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence to show the FSM requested a change in his RCSBP election within one year of his marriage to the applicant. He had completed a DD Form 1883 less than one year earlier and should have known, if he desired to provide the RCSBP for the applicant, what to specifically request when they went to obtain her identification card. There is no evidence to show that it was his intent to provide RCSBP coverage for her.

2. Without substantial evidence to show that it was the FSM’s intent to provide the RCSBP for the applicant, it does not appear that it would be inequitable to deny the relief requested. It was Congress’s intent in establishing the SBP to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career. The applicant was married to the FSM for only two years of his military career.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__FNE__ __RWA__ __HBO___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001063617
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/06/11
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022618

    Original file (20100022618.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She and the FSM were married in 1988 and he elected spouse coverage for her within the first year of their marriage. The applicant provides: * the FSM's divorce degree * the FSM's DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) * the applicant and the FSM's marriage license * the FSM's Joint Uniform Military Pay System (JUMPS)-Army Retired/Annuitant Pay Statement effective February 1991 * a letter from DFAS to the FSM, dated 1 February 1991 * the FSM's Retiree Account Statement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011056

    Original file (20080011056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her earlier petition to the Board requesting the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. However, the evidence of record gives no indication that the FSM ever submitted an SBP election form to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057613C070420

    Original file (2001057613C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) to spouse and children coverage in a timely manner. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60 th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001656

    Original file (20110001656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her at the time of his retirement. The applicant further provided a copy of a letter, dated 30 November 2010, from HRC, Retired Pay Branch, wherein she was advised that a review of her late husband's Reserve Component Survivor Benefit File found that he did not complete a DD Form 1883; therefore, she was ineligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060887C070421

    Original file (2001060887C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM's military records from the Army National Guard are not available. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010133C070208

    Original file (20040010133C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states, in effect, the statement provided by the FSM's niece clearly shows the FSM's intent for the applicant to receive RCSBP benefits, as well as the fact that he completed a DD Form 1883 identifying the applicant as beneficiary of his RCSBP annuity; and that these documents were included with other important paperwork. Counsel further indicates that based on the sworn statements provided with the application, it is clear the FSM completed and returned a DD Form 1883 and elected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090355C070212

    Original file (2003090355C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It appears he was not married at that time and, by failing to return the DD Form 1883, did not make an RCSBP election. The FSM and the applicant married in 1998. In the absence of substantiating evidence (i.e., the DD Form 1883) it does not appear that failure to grant the applicant’s requested relief would be inequitable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010677

    Original file (20140010677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 letter, prepared on 9 July 1996, wherein the FSM was notified of completion of the required years of service and eligibility for retired pay upon application. There is no evidence of record that the FSM elected to change his SBP coverage by adding spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of his marriage to the applicant (7 December 1999). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013510

    Original file (20090013510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In Part V (SBP Election) on this form, the FSM indicated that he was married and did not have dependent children. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, it would be appropriate, as a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062248C070421

    Original file (2001062248C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    B___ then applied to this Board for the RCSBP annuity in 1995. Since he was married on the date he was eligible to participate in the RCSBP, by law he could not have made a person with insurable interest election. However, since it was clearly the FSM’s intent to provide for his former spouse, the applicant, and not B___, and since spousal concurrence with a failure to elect spouse coverage was not required at the time, there was no legal error or injustice in not granting B___ the RCSBP annuity.