| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he developed a bipolar disorder prior to his discharge. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG) on 21 March 1994, as a light wheel vehicle mechanic. He was ordered to active duty (AD) on 23 September 1994 and was released from AD on 17 March 1995.
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 June 1995.
The applicant received two letters of reprimand (LOR) for driving while intoxicated (DWI) on 2 June 1996 and on 31 December 1997.
Charges were preferred against the applicant on 4 February 1998, for DWI
on 31 December 1997.
On 25 February 1998, he consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. In doing so, he admitted guilt to the offense charged and acknowledged that he might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life and might be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration (VA) if a discharge under other than honorable conditions were issued. He also elected to submit a statement in his own behalf in which he stated that he became addicted to alcohol. He also stated that he understood and accepted that his alcohol addiction ruined his military career which would affect him for the rest of his life. He accepted responsibility for his bad decisions which were to drive while intoxicated. He had tried hard to overcome his addiction, had not driven under the influence since his incident, which resulted in his court-martial charges, and regardless of what happens he looked forward to some type of future. He further stated that the loss of his career was a wake up call and hoped that he would be granted a general discharge in order to have a more realistic opportunity of seeking employment upon his return to New York.
On 9 March 1998, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge. The applicant was discharged on 31 March 1998. He had a total of 3 years, 3 months, and 25 days of creditable service.
The applicant’s medical records are unavailable for review.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 8 August 2001. The ADRB determined that his discharge was proper and equitable and denied his request on 12 October 2001.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted
personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a
member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge, may at any time after the charges
have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service
in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that he developed a bipolar disorder prior to his discharge; however, there is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to show that he was diagnosed with a bipolar disorder prior to his discharge. There is no evidence that he could not tell right from wrong.
2. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
3. The type of discharge directed and the reasons for that separation were appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_INW____ _DPH___ _HOF___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063439 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020115 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19980331 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR .635-200 C 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027472
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He provided a memorandum, dated 19 November 2004, which states the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, for personality disorder was approved. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001061373
On 25 February 1998, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008667
The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be changed to a medical discharge. On 28 July 1977, after consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. He was released on 28 February 1977 and returned to duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006920
The applicant's request for discharge states he was not subjected to coercion with respect to his request for discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 16 June 1980 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. There...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012809
The applicant states that with the correction of his discharge by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), he requests to be formally and medically retired. The applicant also provides his service medical records and his DVA medical records. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant could not at any time perform his military duties.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008282
In a memorandum for the Commander, Medical Holding Company, dated 11 May 1997 [sic], a Department of the Army Alcohol and Drug Counselor stated that the applicant was initially seen at the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) on 8 August 1997 after being medically referred by the Community Mental Health Services at Fort Gordon, Georgia, and that during his evaluation, the applicant gave information about his history of alcohol use. The counselor stated that due to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027868
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 22 March 1976 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty (Guard Duty) and for driving while under the influence of alcohol.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008224
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. On 21 July 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011167
To deal with the trauma which later became known as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), he self-medicated with alcohol and drugs. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge prior to his discharge. He stated, when he requested discharge, that he did not like Germany or the Army at all so he reenlisted to go to Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011523
On 10 January 1973, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. It is acknowledged he used heroin while serving in Vietnam but evidence shows he voluntarily requested discharge and he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. _______ _X _______...