Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063236C070421
Original file (2001063236C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 16 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063236


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to colonel.

3. The applicant states that he was erroneously excluded for consideration for advancement to colonel during the years 1995 through 1999. He also states that on 17 November 2000, he submitted a special selection board (SSB) consideration request. On 4 April 2001, he received a response from the board indicating omissions from his file for the board during the years 1995 through 1999. The response also indicated the Army Board for Correction of Military Records must approve any criteria for promotion to colonel prior to 1997.

4. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 1995 Reserve Components Selection Board.

5. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by an SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error, which existed in the record at the time of consideration. Material error in this context is one or more errors of such a nature that, in the judgment of the reviewing official (or body), it caused an individual’s non-selection by a promotion board and, that had such error(s) been corrected at the time the individual was considered, a reasonable chance would have resulted that the individual would have been recommended for promotion. The regulation also provides that boards are not required to divulge the proceedings or the reason(s) for non-selection, except where an individual is not qualified due to non-completion of required military schooling.

6. Under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act implemented on 1 October 1996, any request for reconsideration by an SSB for officers in the grade of captain and above for year criteria after 1 October 1996, must be submitted by the officer to the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM.

7. Army Regulation 15-185 establishes procedures for making application, and the consideration of applications, for the correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through this Board. This regulation specifies that no application will be considered until the applicant has exhausted all effective administrative remedies afforded him/her by existing law or regulations, and such legal remedies as appropriately available to the applicant.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to colonel and should now be submitted to SSB’s, as appropriate, for promotion reconsideration.
2. It is also noted that the applicant has not exhausted his administrative remedy concerning reconsideration for promotion under 1997, 1998 and 1999 criteria by requesting promotion reconsideration directly to the Office of Promotions.

3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the complete file of the individual concerned on the OMPF.

2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his records be submitted to duly constituted SSB’s as appropriate.

3. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefor, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.

4. That if the applicant was separated because of his non-selection, his records be further corrected to show:

         a. that his discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve, as applicable, is void, and of no force or effect, that he was credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement for his respective retirement years, from the dates of his now-voided discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve to the date of his return to the active Reserve;

         b. that an adequate explanation be placed in his official personnel files to show that the gap in his officer evaluation reports, from the dates of his now-voided discharge transfer to the Retired Reserve to the date of return to active Reserve status, was not caused by any fault on his part, and to insure that he is not prejudiced thereby in the consideration of any future personnel actions; and

         c. that all documents related to his now-voided non-selection for promotion, and his discharge or transfer be expunged from his official military records.

5. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.

6. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.


BOARD VOTE:

_rks____ _dpk____ _rvo____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                  Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001063236
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011016
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063096C070421

    Original file (2001063096C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his date of rank for major was 23 June 1988 and he should have been considered for promotion to LTC by the 1994 through 1996 promotion boards. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to LTC by a special selection board (SSB) under 1994 criteria and if appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068562C070402

    Original file (2002068562C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2001 Reserve Components Selection Board. Material error in this context is one or more...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062941C070421

    Original file (2001062941C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2001 Reserve Components Selection Board. c. that all documents related to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067313C070402

    Original file (2002067313C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a special selection board (SSB) under 1996 criteria. That if the applicant has been separated,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068379C070402

    Original file (2002068379C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 18 October 2001, he was notified that he had been granted a waiver by the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) for his military education and that his request for a special selection board (SSB) had been approved. On 18 October 2001, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, approved his request and granted a waiver for the military educational requirement for promotion to major for the 2001 criteria....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061503C070421

    Original file (2001061503C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his enlistment be voided and reinstatement as an officer. The ROPMA also specifies that the earliest date of rank an officer may have is the approval date of the criteria under which they were recommended. The applicant is entitled to expunction of his enlistment contract, with no force or effect, reinstatement to his previous commissioned status, and further correction of his military records to show he was promoted to major with a date of rank of 3 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068751C070402

    Original file (2002068751C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the information presented, it is recommended that the applicant's request be approved and his records be considered by an SSB with the military educational waiver. The Board also notes that if the applicant is selected by an SSB, he cannot be promoted until he completes the military educational requirements. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing an approved waiver for the past criteria of the 2000 educational requirements for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083184C070215

    Original file (2002083184C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The review of the applicant’s records by the RC Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, St. Louis, resulted in a determination that the applicant is eligible for consideration for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) using the 1995 criteria. That if selected for promotion by the SSB, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069849C070402

    Original file (2002069849C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. A promotion memorandum dated 19 September 2001, was issued to him showing his promotion effective date for lieutenant colonel as 2 August 2000, the date of his transfer to the USAR, with a date of rank as 30 December 1997. The Board concludes the applicant’s effective date for promotion to lieutenant colonel was correctly established as 2 August 2000, the date of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091212C070212

    Original file (2003091212C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major under the 2003 criteria. The Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, expressed the opinion that the applicant was considered and not recommended for promotion to major by the 2002 RCSB because her record did not contain evidence that she had completed a baccalaureate degree or an OAC. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM can only...