Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063155C070421
Original file (2001063155C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 May 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063155

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr, Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Christopher J. Posser Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that she was entitled to pay grade O-1E when she entered on active duty in the Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) program.

APPLICANT STATES: She had served in an enlisted status in the Army National Guard (ARNG) since April 1986, and had been employed as a unit technician with her ARNG unit since March 1990. She accepted a commission as a second lieutenant in the ARNG and entered on active duty in the AGR program. She has now discovered that neither her prior enlisted service nor her experience as a unit technician count in qualifying her for an O-1E pay grade or for retired pay for years of service.

In support of her application she submits a Notification of Personnel Action,
SF 50-B, which shows her service computation date in the civil service as 18 January 1990, and that she was terminated from her civil service job on 28 August 1998 because of her “Loss of compatible mil membership due to accepting her commission as 2LT.”

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

She enlisted in the ARNG on 9 April 1986, was awarded the military occupational specialties of administration specialist and finance specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-7. She was honorably discharged from her enlisted status on 4 July 1998 due to her acceptance of a commission.

The applicant’s records do not contain any documentation which shows when she entered active duty in the AGR program.

Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual, paragraph 10105, states that commissioned officers in pay grades 0-1, 0-2 and 0-3 are entitled to the special rate of pay of 0-1E, 0-2E and 0-3E, if the officer has had over 4 years of active service as an enlisted member. In computing active enlisted service, active duty for training in an enlisted status is creditable.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant has not shown that she has 4-years of active enlisted service. As such, she is not entitled by law and regulation to be paid as an O-1E. As a soldier holding the MOS’ of administration specialist and finance specialist, it must be presumed that she was aware of this limitation when she accepted her commission.

2. Since ADT performed as a reservist assigned to a USAR unit is credited when determining whether an officer on active duty qualifies for O-1E pay, the Board concludes there is no inequity in this case.

3. As for the applicant’s federal civil service, there are no provisions in law or regulation in which to count that service towards qualifying for O-1E pay, or in which to count that service towards retirement eligibility for years of service in the Army.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___fne __ ___cp____ _____wtm DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001063155
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020502
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021699

    Original file (20110021699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, relief from the 6-year barring statute in order to receive payment for military service performed and correction of her basic pay rate as a commissioned officer to show she had 1,460 retirement points as an enlisted member and therefore, is entitled to payment of the difference in “E pay” for the years 2004 through 2006. Her OMPF contains a National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 19 April 2000, which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016655

    Original file (20130016655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 October 2009, she accepted her AGR position and was told she would keep her enlistment incentives and she was referred to NGB-EDU-09-058, dated 14 September 2009, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits Upon Acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, which states Soldiers ordered to active duty in the State (Title 32) AGR program and (Title 32) Military Technician Program will be entitled to SLRP payments as long as they are serving under their initial contract...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006867

    Original file (20140006867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the $20,000 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that she contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Applicant's request for an ETP for payment of the SLRP incentive in which she provided a summary of her enlistment in the OHARNG, training, and DMOSQ in MOS 42A. Records show the applicant enlisted in the OHARNG on 9 August 2007 for a period of 6 years in MOS 42A and her enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003732

    Original file (20130003732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Self-authored statements * DA Form 2142 (Pay Inquiry), dated 11 February 2013 * memorandum, subject: Additional Duty Appointment, dated 3 November 2012 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) * emails * Orders Number 12-208-00117, issued by Headquarters, 63d Regional Support Command, Mountain View, CA, dated 26 July 2012 * Orders Number R-07-287352, issued by HRC, dated 6 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005854

    Original file (20080005854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was released from Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status as a lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 after 20 years of active Federal service effective 15 September 2002. He was promoted to COL on 27 October 2004 and served more than 3 years as a Reserve Officer while at the same time serving as a full-time technician. He served for a period of 10 months on active duty after his promotion to COL/O-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019789

    Original file (20130019789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in her enlistment contract. The applicant states: * her enlistment contract outlined that the SLRP would be revoked if she took a new duty assignment as a technician or an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Education and Incentives Operational Message (EIOM) 13-003 to provide instructions for ETP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009020C070206

    Original file (20050009020C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further shows that she was credited with zero points for the period 27 August 1984 through 8 May 1987. It further shows that she was credited with zero points for the period 27 August 1984 through 8 May 1987. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was credited with 73 retirement points during the period 2 December 1983 through 26 August 1984 and had completed 8 months and 25 days of service, which was a partial qualifying year for retirement purposes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022206

    Original file (20130022206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion recommended approval for reinstatement of the applicant's SLRP due to the following: * the applicant reenlisted on 10 December 2009 and executed a contract addendum to receive the SLRP incentive * the contract extended her ETS from 4 December 2012 to 10 December 2015 * she received her annual loan repayments in 2010 and 2011 * she accepted a military technician position on 7 October 2012 * she was denied an annual loan repayment in 2012 * NGB denied her request for ETP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015586

    Original file (20100015586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provides his April 2010 LES which shows his PEBD (Pay Entry Basic date) as 3 February 1976 (the date he initially enlisted in the USAR) and that he was receiving pay based on 34 years of total service. Section 010101 (service which is creditable) states for most members who enter and serve on active duty without a break in service, the basic pay date is the date the member enters active or inactive service. d. Section 010103A(2) (Creditable Prior Enlisted Service) states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021599

    Original file (20130021599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicated or acknowledged she understood: * she was currently in the ARNG and was extending for 6 years in the ARNG, in the non-critical MOS of 42F and non-critical unit (4th Personnel Service Detachment) that was authorized the SLRP incentive * she was not enlisting for an AGR tour (under Title 10 or Title 32) nor was she enlisting for a technician position * she had 3 loans in the amount of $20,000 and the total amount of qualifying loans would not exceed $20,000 * her SLRP eligibility...