| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. He states he was not aware that he could have his discharge upgraded and that no one "talked to [him] about not leaving the Army" in 1978. He states that he was "young and stupid" and that he has "changed since then." He also notes that the absence of a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code in item 10 of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) is preventing him from enlisting in the Army Reserve. He submits no evidence in support of his request.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He entered active duty on 3 May 1976, at the age of 17, with 10 years of formal education and a GT (general technical) score of 97. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and was assigned to Panama as an infantryman in October 1976.
By September 1977 he had attained the grade of E-3 and in December 1977 he achieved a Skill Qualification Test (SQT) score of 73 percent. That score indicated that he was qualified as an infantryman at his current skill level (60 percent required), but not for the next higher skill level (80 percent required).
In March 1978 the applicant's unit commander initiated action to administratively separate the applicant from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5, Army Regulation 635-200. His commander cited two records of non-judicial punishment, two letters of reprimand, the applicant's poor attitude, lack of motivation, inability to adapt socially, hostility toward the Army, lack of self-discipline, and failure to demonstrate promotion potential as the basis for his recommendation.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the proposed separation, consulted with counsel, and elected not to make any statements, or submit a rebuttal in his behalf.
The recommendation was approved and on 7 April 1978 the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions.
The copy of his DD Form 214, contained in his military personnel file does reflect a RE Code of 3. At the time the individual was separated from active duty, item 10 (RE-Code), and item 9c (authority and reason), were omitted from some copies issued to the individual. The individual could then give those copies to employers or organization that might require copies of the separation report, but did not have a need to know the basis for the individual's separation. A copy of the applicant's DD Form 214, which contains that information, will be provided to the applicant as part of this Board's action.
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the policy and sets forth the procedure for administrative separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5, as then in effect, provided, in pertinent part, for the Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). This program provided that an individual who had completed at least 6 months, but less than 36 months of active duty and who demonstrated (by poor attitude, lack of motivation, lack of self-discipline, inability to adapt socially or emotionally or failure to demonstrate promotion potential) that they could not or would not meet acceptable standards could be separated. Such personnel were issued a general or honorable discharge, as appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200 also states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
The applicant’s separation was executed in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his general discharge was consistent with his overall military service. He has submitted no evidence which would serve as a basis to upgrade his discharge.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 7 April 1978, the date applicant was discharged. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 7 April 1981.
The application is dated 22 September 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__INW __ __TL____ __JAM __ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063137 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011218 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 142.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008745C070208
The applicant provides: a. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. AR 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067008C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He stated that he had to get out of the Army. On 6 February 1980 the applicant’s commanding officer notified the applicant that he was initiating action to release him from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31 (Expeditious Discharge Program), because of his lack of motivation as indicted by reports of evaluation, statements, tests,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506200C070209
He states he was discharged with known disabilities; mental and physical. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 24 July 1981. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9505975C070209
The applicant was discharged on 14 December 1977. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. It contains no information, advice or recommendation which would constitute a basis for granting the relief requested or for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606642C070209
His commander told him that the only way out of this hardship situation was to accept a general discharge. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062879C070421
He provides a document indicating he has changed his full name under the Common Law of Massachusetts; his Report of Separation from Active Duty, DD Form 214; a Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record, DA Form 3349, dated 15 May 1978; three pages extracted from his service medical records; a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital Summary sheet dated 25 July 1979; a VA appeal dated 2 July 1996; a VA rating decision dated 9 March 1999 showing the applicant’s disability ratings for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061602C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064707C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was discharged on 30 July 1993. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001069
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded MOS 19K (M60A2 Armor Crewman). The evidence of record also shows that applicant was discharged on 21 August 1979 and his MOS was 19J1O (M60A2 Armor Crewman).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001263
On 10 July 1978, he was counseled by his unit commander and indicated that he desired a discharge. On 25 July 1978, his immediate commander advised him that he intended to recommend that he be discharged from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-33 (Trainee Discharge Program (TDP)) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of inability to adapt socially or emotionally to military life. At the time he was ordered discharged, the applicant was a member of the U.S....