| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. W. E. Schnupp | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of that portion of his previous application, which denied his request to have wounds to his left thigh reflected on his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge.
3. In support of his request, he provides a copy of Veterans Administration (VA) Form 10-1174, VA Outpatient Medical Treatment Information, reflecting that, in addition to shell fragment wounds (SFW) to his right buttock, right leg and right shoulder, he also suffered a SFW to the left thigh. He also provides a 1970 letter from his personal physician confirming that X-Rays show a small bit of metal in his left thigh.
4. Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board’s original consideration of his case (AR2000050916).
5. The original consideration of this case concerned the applicant’s request to correct his social security number, show the Purple Heart and list his left thigh wound on the DD Form 214. His application was approved except for that portion pertaining to listing the left thigh wound on the DD Form 214. However, the documentation he has provided with his current application represents new information that requires consideration by the Board.
6. A summary of the applicant’s record shows that he was inducted on 1 May 1967, served as a light weapons infantryman with the 11th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam from 1 December 1967 to 5 February 1968, when he was evacuated because of SFW to the right leg, buttock and shoulder. He separated from active duty to the US Army Reserve from which he was discharged on 1 April 1973.
7. Block 30, Remarks, of the applicant’s DD Form 214, reflects the SFW he suffered in Vietnam. His record contains no reference to injuries to his left thigh. His Enlisted Qualification Record also shows that during the entire 2 year period of his active service between 1 May 1967 and 30 April 1969, his conduct and efficiency were both rated as excellent.
8. The VA Form 10-1174, he provided shows that he was authorized VA treatment for wounds to his right side as well as a wound to his left thigh. His
physician’s letter confirms an X-Ray finding of a “small bit of metal in the left thigh” presumably resulting from the same incident that caused the injuries to his right side.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to soldiers who distinguish themselves from among their fellow soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency and fidelity throughout a specified period of continuous enlisted active Federal military service. For first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Information on VA Form 10-1174, pertaining to the applicant’s SFW to the left thigh is only quasi-official, and his physician’s letter, while confirming the presence of a metal piece in his left thigh, does not provide conclusive evidence that the injury occurred as a result of combat. At the same time, however, there is no reason to doubt the validity of the foregoing information. Particularly since reflecting it on the DD Form 214, does not authorize any additional entitlements to the applicant.
2. Accordingly, the Board directs that the SFW to the left thigh be reflected on the DD Form 214, along with the other wounds already shown there.
3. Additionally, since the entire period of his active service between 1 May 1967 and 30 April 1969, were rated as excellent, it appears that he also meets the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal. It would be appropriate therefore, to include this award on his DD Form 214.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned show that he
suffered a SFW to the left thigh and that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 May 1967 to 30 April 1969.
BOARD VOTE:
___jpi___ ___pm___ ___rvo__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__________Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001063114 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2000530 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 107.00 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917
However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012445
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. The military medical records the applicant provides show he received a shrapnel wound in the buttocks on 10 December 1967 and that he received medical treatment for the wound. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010605
Counsel adds that during the Board's last consideration of the applicant's case, the analyst who wrote the case stated the evidence provided was determined to be sufficient to show that he met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Numbers AR20050001942 on 23 November 2005 and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018984
As a result of a decision of this Board on 25 June 1969, the applicant's record was corrected to show that on 30 October 1967, instead of being REFRAD for the convenience of the government, the applicant was retired by reason of physical disability and placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) with a 60-percent disability rating. The record further shows that after the PEB determined the applicant was fit, the U.S. Army Physical Review Council modified the findings and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001908
There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, his record should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 September 1967 through 23 August 1969; and b. amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal, the Presidential...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104598C070208
The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request show that he was being treated for problems with his left knee. On one report, his physician indicated that the applicant had stated that he had a history of shrapnel wounds in the left hand, and had previous shrapnel wounds to his tibia. The applicant's statement that he was immediately evacuated to Japan, thus orders were never issued for award of the Purple Heart, is not consistent with the evidence of record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009542
However, there are no general orders or corroborating evidence that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant sustained fragment wounds to his left thigh and was treated at a military medical facility in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of substantial evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027226
For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 1 August 1969 in Vietnam *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018362
The applicant provides one page of a VA Rating Decision, dated 17 November 1976, wherein it stated the applicant served in Vietnam for 11 months and 15 days and he stated while on patrol duty in 1967 he was struck in the left buttock by a fragment of an exploding grenade. The criteria for award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that a Soldier received a wound/injury as the result of hostile action, the wound/injury required medical treatment by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607153C070209
He states, in effect, that he was wounded in Vietnam in November 1971, but the Purple Heart was not reflected on his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. While the medical records do not make clear that his wounds were the result of hostile action, collateral documentation shows that he was, at the time of his evacuation, a squad leader with an infantry unit involved in...