| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his RE (Reenlistment Eligibility) Code of “4” be changed to RE-2. He states he is attempting to return to the Army as a chaplain. He notes that his “discharge and disability are due to Raynaud’s Disease” and that it does not adversely affect his ability to work outdoors year round and will not adversely “hamper” his ability to function effectively as an Army chaplain. He states that he does not understand why his Raynaud’s Disease resulted in his discharge, or why he received an RE-4. He notes that because of the “error” he is precluded from returning to military service. He maintains that “Raynaud’s Disease does not warrant” an RE-4. The applicant does not submit any evidence in support of his request. He does note on his application that he is a “disabled veteran” and has a 20 percent service connected disability rating from the VA.
3. Records available to the Board indicate he entered active duty on 13 January 1989 for a period of 4 years.
4. A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), conducted in January 1991, found that the applicant “has been having problems with painful changes in hand color and sensation which he has been noticing with exposure to cooler temperature 60 degrees or lower.” His chief complaint was “pain and numbness involving both hands.” He was diagnosed with Raynaud’s Disease and issued a permanent P-4 profile. His profile precluded “prolonged exposure to cold longer than 30 minutes” and required him to wear gloves if temperature was less than 40. The MEB recommended referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendation of the MEB.
5. On 4 February 1991 an informal PEB concluded that the applicant’s condition prevented “reasonable performance of duties required by grade and military specialty” and found him unfit for continued military service with a disability rating of 20 percent. The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendation of the PEB and waived entitlement to a formal hearing.
6. On 22 February 1991 the applicant was discharged as a result of physical disability and received over $3000.00 in severance pay. Item 27 (Reentry Code) reflects “4” and item 26 (Separation Code) reflects “JFL.”
7. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE Codes, including RA RE Codes.
8. RE-4 applies to individuals who were separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification. RE-3 applies to individuals who were not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable. RE-2 applied to individuals who were separated prior to completing their enlistment contract, but who did not contemplate reenlistment. As of 1995 the RE-2 was no longer in use by the Army.
9. Army Regulation 601-280, in effect at the time the applicant was separated from active duty, noted that soldiers being separated for physical disability with entitlement to receive disability severance pay were ineligible for immediate reenlistment, however, they were eligible to apply for RA enlistment at a later date. Separation by reason of physical disability was not one of the categories which was considered among the “nonwaivable disqualifications” listed in paragraph 2-21 of Army Regulation 601-280. As such RE-3 would have been the appropriate RE Code for the applicant at the time of his 1991 separation.
10. Additionally, Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation. They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data. It notes that “JFL” is the appropriate SPD code for individuals separated by reason of disability who received severance pay.
11. A “cross-reference” chart, provided by officials from the separations branch at the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, confirms that “RE-3” is the appropriate RE Code for individuals who receive an SPD code of JFL.
12. Army Regulation 135-100 lists the eligibility and qualification requirements for appointment as an Army chaplain.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant contends that he does not understand why his Raynaud’s Disease resulted in his discharge, or an RE-4, the evidence indicates that he concurred with the findings and recommendations of the MEB and PEB, which ultimately resulted in his separation by reason of physical disability and entitlement to disability severance pay.
2. However, the Board does note that while the evidence indicates that the applicant was not entitled to an RE-2, his RE-4 was incorrect and should have been an RE-3. The Board is aware that correcting this item on the applicant’s DD Form 214 may or may not make him eligible to be an Army chaplain. He is advised to contact his local recruiting office to determine eligibility and qualification requirements.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by changing the applicant’s RE-4 on his 1991 DD Form 214 to reflect RE-3.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__JHL___ __WTM __RWA _ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Joann H. Langston___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001062884 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020314 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.03 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001299
At the time the applicant was discharged, and currently, members separated by reason of physical disability with severance pay were assigned a code of RE-3, which applies to persons who are disqualified from reenlistment but the disqualification is waivable. As a result, the applicant's record should be corrected to show he was assigned a code of RE-3. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006630
A Standard Form 507 (Medical Record) indicates the Physical Review Board determined she was qualified for retention in the USAR in accordance with AR 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3 and her PULHES was 211111. At the time of her discharge from active duty due to parenthood, her records were scheduled to go before a medical evaluation performance board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009411
The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 31 October 1989. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant upon his discharge on 19 November 1990 confirms he was separated, in the rank of private first class, under the provisions of paragraph 4-24e(3), Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), by reason of "physical disability with severance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004494
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct: * Separation Code * Reentry (RE) Code * Period of inactive duty * Period in the Delayed Entry Program 2. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code of "JFL" was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001574
On 10 June 2011, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of disability, severance pay, non-combat related. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008257
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JFL" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (involuntarily) under chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-40 by reason of disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his RE code from 4 to 3.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010372
The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code of "JFL" and a RE Code of "3." His DD Form 214 stated that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code JFL and a RE Code of 3. Pertinent Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021880
The applicant states he received a disability discharge and was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JFL and reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 based on the authority and reason for his discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his discharge on 19 December 2007 confirms he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 4-24h(3), Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) in item 25 (Separation Authority). Item 26...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003896
The applicant was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and was granted a 10-percent disability rating for code 8299 and 8211 (moderate paralysis of doroscapular nerve) and a 10-percent disability rating for code 5295 (mechanical low back pain). The PEB recommended a 20 percent combined rating and that the applicant be separated with entitlement to severance pay if otherwise qualified. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003854C070206
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time established RE- 3 as the appropriate code to assign members separated under these provisions, this RE code assignment remains in effect under the current regulation. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the...