| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: While he was on active duty, his records kept getting lost, which kept him from being paid. When he didn’t receive any money to send to his pregnant wife, he decided that he had to go absent without leave (AWOL) to earn some money for her.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 March 1971, was awarded the military occupational specialty of mechanical maintenance helper, and was stationed in the continental United States.
He went AWOL from 22 thru 29 July 1971; 2 thru 9 August 1971; 24 January thru 27 February 1972; 5 thru 8 May 1972; and 19 June thru 4 October 1972, for which he accepted nonjudicial punishment on three occasions, and was convicted by special court-martial on one occasion. The punishments imposed and court-martial sentence included forfeiture of pay.
When the applicant was apprehended during his last period of AWOL, court-martial charges were preferred against him. At that time he submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In a sworn statement he submitted along with his request, he stated “I have been explained to that I will receive no benefits what so ever. Also that I will receive an undesirable discharge if this form is accepted.”
The applicant’s request was accepted by the appropriate authority and he was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate on 17 November 1972.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Five periods of AWOL, two of which were over 30 days, is more than sufficient upon which to base an undesirable discharge. As such, the Board concludes that there wasn’t any error or injustice in the type of discharge or characterization of service given to the applicant.
2. While the applicant states that he did not receive pay because his records kept getting lost, he has not submitted any evidence to support his allegation. However, the Board notes that the applicant would not have been paid for any time he was AWOL, and that forfeitures of pay due to his NJP’s and special court-martial would also garnish his pay. Therefore, while the applicant may have received no pay due on many occasions, it would appear more likely that the lack of pay was due to his own misconduct, not on administrative error.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___sk ___ ___jtm___ ___teo _ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062843 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020606 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | A71.00 |
| 2. | A93.07 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058577C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He did not complete his airborne training and received orders transferring him to Fort Lewis, Washington with a report date of 25 April 1971.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084220C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. His request was denied and he was told that he had to go back to Fort Hood.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007153
The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 9 June 1972, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that an Undesirable Discharge Certificate be issued and that he be reduced to pay grade E-1. His military records also contain no evidence which would entitle him to a further upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067929C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As a result, a member of the Judge Advocate General Corps sent him a letter acknowledging his request, explaining what a discharge for the good of the service entailed, explaining what his rights were in conjunction with his request, telling him that if his request was accepted he could expect to receive a undesirable discharge, and providing him the number of undesirable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107014C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. It was not until he surrendered to military authorities that he indicated that he went AWOL because he had to take care of his family as a result of his wife deserting him and his children and there is no evidence in the available records that shows that he sought help from his superiors prior to going AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018010
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. After consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In a statement provided with his request for discharge he stated he would go AWOL again if his request for discharge was denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001648
If the Army kept him, he would go AWOL again and again. On 11 August 1986, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade the characterization and/or the reason for his discharge. The military service issued the actual Clemency Discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013520
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge with full benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged on 26 June 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The available records do not show the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014505
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014505 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 8 March 1973, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002204C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.