Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062726C070421
Original file (2001062726C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        
        

         BOARD DATE: 20 December 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062726

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Lee Cates Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III Member
Mr. Lester Echols Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Purple Heart (PH).

APPLICANT STATES: He provides copies of medical records and correspondence with the Commander, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). Although there are no records to substantiate his service, the applicant indicates he was separated on 13 June 1953.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were not available and the information herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The Board considered the applicant’s request on 4 December 2001 and, although they voted to deny relief, the board, by unanimous vote, determined that the applicant’s failure to file within the statutory time limits should be excused. Hence the applicant’s case has been reconstituted to excuse his failure to timely file.

A Clinical Record Cover Sheet, 545th General Dispensary, dated 9 May 1952 indicates the applicant (then serving in the grade of sergeant), a member of the 164th Military Police Company, received a penetrating wound of the left leg on 8 May 1952.

A Clinical Record Brief, dated 11 July 1952, prepared by the Tokyo Army Hospital, indicates the “AI: 9 May 1952 in Co. area in Korea when accidentally shot by another EM.” This brief also indicates he was admitted to the hospital from the 21st Evacuation Hospital, Pusan, Korea on 15 May 1952.

In letters to the applicant on 17 and 31 August 2001, the Chief, Military Awards Branch, PERSCOM explained in detail, the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 (Military Awards) and Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 1129.

AR 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

Title 10, USC, section 1129, authorizes the Secretaries of military departments to award the PH to individuals who are killed or wounded by friendly fire. The friendly fire must have occurred while directly engaged in armed conflict and the “friendly” projective or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant is not entitled to award of the PH based on the evidence of record.

2. His contentions have been noted; however, there is no evidence in the available records to support his request.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_jns____ __le____ _tbr____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062726
SUFFIX
DATE BOARDED 20011220
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014459

    Original file (20140014459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was told by those in command that he was not authorized a PH because he was wounded as a result of friendly fire * he meets the regulations for the PH under friendly fire pursuant to Title 10 U.S. Code (USC), Section 1129 (Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in action by friendly fire) * when he left Vietnam, his local command informed him they had lost his medical records and he also has post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) * he also tried to find reports or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002639

    Original file (20090002639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant departed Japan en route to the Continental United States on 31 December 1969 and he arrived at Valley Forge General Hospital on 2 January 1970. His contentions have been noted and while his records clearly show that he was wounded by a friendly projectile, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence, to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008167

    Original file (20130008167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the transcript of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) held on 13 March 1952 shows the record was corrected to show "Line of Duty - Yes" based on a report dated 12 March 1951. They have filed an appeal with the Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery, based on errors in the FSM's record, but they would like to have the FSM's records corrected to show he was entitled to the Purple Heart. His record is void of documentation showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061652C070421

    Original file (2001061652C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He claims that the first wound was from an enemy grenade and the second was a bullet wound; however, the bullet wound was not entered in his record. While the Board does not question the applicant’s interpretation of the events of 16 July 1952, or of the wound(s) he received on that date, it finds insufficient evidence of record or independent evidence provided by him that supports his claim of entitlement to a second PH for a second wound from a separate engagement on 16 July 1952. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009957

    Original file (20080009957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster). The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was wounded in action in Korea on three separate occasions, on 21 August 1952, on 17 October 1952, on 14 January 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 27 of his DD Form 214 the “Purple Heart...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005166

    Original file (20130005166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of this form would have listed any combat injuries and the date. These are: a. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 22 April 1966, shows he was admitted to the 106th General Hospital on 19 March 1966 after being transferred from the 85th Evacuation Hospital due to vertigo, caused by a blast and deafness in both ears. Therefore, regrettably, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028023

    Original file (20100028023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record does not contain any orders which show he was awarded the Purple Heart or medical documentation which shows he was wounded as a result of “friendly fire” in Vietnam. Therefore, in the absence of any corroborating evidence of record which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or friendly fire, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004853C071029

    Original file (20070004853C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record also includes 8009th Army Unit, Osaka Army Hospital General Orders Number 321, dated 12 September 1951, which awarded the applicant the PH for being wounded in action near Kunchon, Korea on 8 September 1951. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004326C070208

    Original file (20040004326C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 May2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004326 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his military record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063027C070421

    Original file (2001063027C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a copy of a certificate for the Purple Heart made out in his name as evidence for the Board. This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation for actions during the period 1 January 1951 to 30 April 1954, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 82-54. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the...