| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. June Hajjar | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Member | |
| Mr. Roger Able | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that all charges be expunged from his record and that his dishonorable discharge (DD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his record contains faulty derogatory information based upon a biased, faulty, and inadequate investigation, which resulted in his being convicted for a crime he did not commit. He claims that the court-martial charges that were preferred against him stem from a single and relatively minor incident involving a $200.00 unauthorized credit card withdrawal. This incident was improperly extended to include overly broad court-martial charges that resulted in a conviction that improperly gives the impression that he was convicted of serious felony offenses and these continue to affect his ability to gain employment, care for his family, and inhibit his ability to fully exercise his constitutional and civil rights. In support of his application, he provides a copy of General Court-Martial Order (GCMO) Number 32, dated 16 October 1986, issued by Headquarters, 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Polk, Louisiana.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 15 November 1983, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Army for 3 years. He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewmember) and the highest rank he attained during his active duty tenure was specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4).
The applicant’s record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition. However, it does contain an extensive disciplinary history that includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on the following three separate occasions for the offenses indicated: 22 January 1985, for making a false report that he lost his ration control plate; 14 January 1986, for two specifications of failing to go to his prescribed place of duty; and
4 June 1986, for six specifications of failing to go to his prescribed place of duty.
On 17 September 1986, the applicant plead guilty and was convicted by a general court-martial (GCM) of the following offenses: escaping custody; resisting apprehension by a military police investigator; stealing a bank card, the property of a noncommissioned officer (NCO); disobeying the lawful command of a superior commissioned officer; breaking restriction; wrongfully possessing a military identification card with the intent to deceive; signing a false official statement with the intent to deceive; and larceny of United States (US) currency of a value of $200.00, the property of a NCO. The resultant sentence included a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 20 months, and a DD. On 16 October 1986, the convening authority approved the sentence and ordered all but the DD portion to be executed.
On 16 April 1987, the US Army Court of Military Review examined the applicant’s record of trial and found it to be legally sufficient to support the findings of guilty and the resultant sentence. On 3 September 1987, the unexecuted portion of the sentence in regard to the DD portion of the sentence was ordered executed and on 30 October 1987, the applicant was separated accordingly. At the time of his discharge, he had completed a total of 2 years, 7 months, and 7 days of creditable active military service and had accrued 489 days of lost time due to confinement.
Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 as amended does not permit any redress by the Army Board of Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) of the finality of a court-martial conviction and empowers the ABCMR to only change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the contentions of the applicant that his court-martial conviction was based on a faulty investigation that resulted in charges being preferred against him for serious crimes based on a minor incident and that impaired his ability to gain employment, care for his family, and partake of his constitutional and civil rights. However, the Board finds none of these factors are sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. By law, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed. However, in this case, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses with which he was charged.
3. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contentions and desires, the Board finds that the type of discharge received by the applicant appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted and accurately reflects his overall record of service. Therefore, the Board concludes that clemency is not warranted in this case.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___JH___ __KAK___ __RA___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062575 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/05 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (DD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19871030 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200 Chapter 3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | As a result of Court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 105.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007265
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090007265 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 15 October 1986, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review ordered that the findings of guilty for Specifications 1 and 5 of the charge be set aside and dismissed and that the action of the convening authority, dated 19 July 1983, be set aside and the record of trial be returned to The Judge Advocate General for a new review and action by a different convening authority. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006306
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017466
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017466 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to honorable. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the final discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068550C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016227
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial and received a BCD. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020353
The applicant states, in a letter to the Veteran's Administration Board, during his time of service he had been considered a respectable and honorable Soldier by his fellow Soldiers as well as his higher authorities. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012111
The applicant requests that his general court-martial be expunged from his official records. The applicant has not provided any evidence in support of his application. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a court-martial conviction, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073657C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 30 August 1987, the convening authority approved the sentence and ordered all but the DD portion to be executed. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021416
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge (GD). The applicant was discharged with a BCD on 12 July 1988.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002241
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002241 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the final discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.