| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his administrative discharge be changed to a medical discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he saw a mental doctor once while in the Army. He is now seeing a mental doctor and taking medication. He provides no supporting evidence.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
His enlistment documents show he was born on 15 April 1957 (In a 1983 application to the Board to correct his birthdate, he presented evidence to show he was born on 15 April 1959.) His enlistment physical examination shows he was evaluated by neuro-psychiatry due to a record of “joy riding” and possible car theft. The impression was that he was emotionally immature but he was found to be qualified for enlistment. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 February 1976.
The applicant’s service medical records show that, on an unknown date, he was seen by the Mental Health Clinic Service for a complaint of difficulty adjusting to the military structure within his unit. He was diagnosed with an adjustment reaction coupled with an immature personality.
On 27 April 1977, the commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37, Expeditious Discharge Program. The commander cited the applicant’s lack of motivation to function as a soldier, his apathetic feeling towards the service, his constantly needing supervision, and his inability to maintain his billets living area. Four specific counseling statements were cited. The commander recommended he receive a general discharge under honorable conditions.
On 27 April 1977, the applicant acknowledged notification of the action and voluntarily consented to the discharge.
On 2 May 1977, the applicant completed a separation physical. The Report of Medical Examination, SF 88, did not indicate any psychiatric problems and he was found qualified for separation.
On 3 May 1977, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant be given a general discharge under honorable conditions.
On 18 May 1977, the applicant was discharged, with a general discharge under honorable conditions, in pay grade E-2, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37. He had completed 1 year, 3 months, and 6 days of creditable active service and had no lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. At the time paragraph 5-37 provided that members who had completed at least 6 months but less than 36 months of continuous active service on their first enlistment and who had demonstrated that they could not or would not meet acceptable standards required of enlisted personnel because of poor attitude, lack of motivation, lack of self-discipline, inability to adapt socially or emotionally or failure to demonstrate promotion potential could be discharged. It provided for the expeditious elimination of substandard, nonproductive soldiers before board or punitive action becomes necessary. No member would be discharged under this program unless he/she voluntarily consented to the proposed discharge.
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The regulation defines “physically unfit” as unfitness due to physical disability. The unfitness is of such a degree that a soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty.
Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment, retention, and separation. Paragraphs 3-35 and 3-36 state that personality disorders and adjustment disorders will be dealt with or may be the basis for administrative separation.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
3. The Board notes that the applicant was evaluated by mental health services both before his enlistment and prior to his discharge. However, the primary diagnoses both times were that he was immature (a reasonable diagnosis given his age) but never was he diagnosed as psychotic or otherwise unable to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right. The type of discharge given was appropriate considering the applicant’s mental evaluation diagnoses and his overall military record.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __tap___ __hbo___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062407 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011206 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19770518 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, ch 5-37 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A07.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014977
The applicant's available service medical records contain only the following three medical documents: a. Ambulance Trip Report, dated 20 October 1977 at 0005, which detailed the dispatch of an ambulance at the request of the applicant's roommate due to the applicant's possible epileptic convulsion in his barracks room. The Army only rates conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. Operating under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009078
The applicant requests, in effect, his honorable discharge to changed to reflect a medical retirement or discharge. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 1 November 1977, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 5-37 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009282
On 20 May 1977, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP)), chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200. This form also shows: * he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 * his service was characterized as under honorable conditions * he was issued a General Discharge Certificate 11. There is no evidence that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004001172
His DD Form 214 shows that he was a veteran who was honorably discharged and with nothing of failure in [his service]. Item 20 of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 11 years of school. Paragraph 5-37 at the time provided that members who completed at least 6 months but less than 36 months of continuous active service on their first enlistment and who demonstrated that they could not or would not meet acceptable standards required of enlisted personnel because of poor attitude, lack of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013263
On 23 September 1977, the applicant's unit commander initiated separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP). Army Regulation 15185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000150
The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 26 January 1977, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be discharge under honorable conditions and furnished a General Discharge Certificate. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions of an individual whose military record was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005394
On 28 June 1977, he was notified of his pending separation for failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention under the Expeditious Discharge Program under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-37. On 19 July 1977, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that he be furnished a general discharge. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006930
On 20 August 1976, the applicant was notified of his pending separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5, paragraph 5-37, under the Expeditious Discharge Program. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions of an individual whose military record was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. _______ _ X____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013484
On 15 March 1977, his immediate commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program (EDP)). On 6 April 1977, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The evidence of record shows the applicant demonstrated he could not or would not meet acceptable standards required of enlisted personnel because of his inability to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510555C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be corrected to a medical discharge. In that recommendation his commander stated that the applicant had been counseled on five occasions between 10 February and 17 May 1977 for insubordination, appearance, negative attitude towards the Army, AWOL, poor duty performance, and shirking. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.