| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. P. A. Castle | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Silver Star (SS) and the Purple Heart (PH).
3. With regard to award of the Silver Star, the applicant has not exhausted his administrative remedy and has been advised in separate correspondence to submit a recommendation for award of the Silver Star under the provisions of Section 1130, Title 10, United States Code. Therefore, this portion of the applicant’s request is not discussed further in these Proceedings.
4. The applicant states, that in Vietnam, he was injured and treated for his injury at the company area by a medic and was never in the hospital. He contends that the Army should award him the PH after they coordinate with the soldiers on the list he submitted as evidence.
5. The applicant's military record shows he was inducted on 2 January 1968, and completed basic combat training and advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman. On 8 March 1968, the applicant received an accelerated promotion to the pay grade of E-2 and after completing the Noncommissioned Officer Candidate School, he was promoted to the pay grade of E-5.
6. He was assigned to Vietnam on 22 January 1969, and continued to serve until 25 December 1969. He was released from active duty (REFRAD), in the pay grade of E-5, on 26 December 1969, with an honorable characterization of service. He was then transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training). His separation report reflects that during his service he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). Further, a review of the applicant’s record shows no basis that could serve to disqualify him for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCM).
7. A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) notes the applicant’s unit (4th Infantry Division) was credited with participating in four designated campaigns during the applicant’s period of assignment and that he is authorized a bronze service star (BSS) for each campaign. Also, based on the unit’s period of participation, the applicant should be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with/Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation.
8. In previous attempts to receive the PH, the applicant requested assistance from his Congressman in 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974 and 1977. He was advised each time that there was no evidence to show he was wounded or injured as a result of action against the enemy, and in the absence of such a record, the award of the PH was denied.
9. In support of this application to the Board for the PH the applicant has submitted the names of ten soldiers who allegedly served with him in Vietnam. He contends these soldiers can confirm his eligibility for the PH award.
10. There is no evidence in the records of an order for the PH. There is no entry about an injury on the applicant’s DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, or his report of discharge (DD Form 214), which he signed and authenticated as being correct, prior to his REFRAD.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. A review of the applicant’s records shows no basis that could serve to disqualify him for the award of the Good Conduct Medal.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with/Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation, and four bronze service stars on his VSM.
2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal for his service for the period from 2 January 1968 through 26 December 1969.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has not provided sufficient documentation or evidence to support his contention that he qualifies for the PH. Inasmuch as the Board is not an investigative agency, the burden of proof rests with the applicant to demonstrate error or injustice in his case.
4. The contentions of the applicant, along with his belief that he is authorized the PH, have been noted by the Board. However, they are not supported by the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by showing that he is entitled to four bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal; and;
b. by awarding him the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with/Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation and the Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 2 January 1968 thru 26 December 1969.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
___fe ___ __reb ___ _be____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ _______ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ _______ DENY APPLICATION
____Fred N. Eichorn____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001062394 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/18 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PARTIAL |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 46 | 107.0000 |
| 2. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 3. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCA |
| 4. 102 | 107.0056/GCM |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000786
He states he was awarded the PH for wounds he received in combat in Vietnam. He provides a PH Certificate, dated 20 May 1969, showing he was awarded the PH for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 28 February 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from his DD Form 214 and b. adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * PH * VSM with one silver service star * Expert Marksmanship...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001805
The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 June 1968. Thus, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH for wounds received in action in the RVN on 20 May 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars b. awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005780
The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 10 January 1968 through 20 April 1969. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007033
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The citation on the general orders awarding him the BSM with "V" Device states that he was seriously wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the PH for a wound he received on 29 January 1968; b. deleting the BSM and VSM from his DD Form 214; and c. adding to his DD Form 214 the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016615
This publication shows that the 101st Airborne Division Artillery and the 377th Artillery, during the time of the applicant's assignment, were respectfully cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated in 1970; and in DAGO Number 48, dated in 1971; for awards of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records show that the applicant participated in seven campaign periods during his service in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000956
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 1987 to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1987 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting award of the VSM from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1987...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001051
Therefore, absent any evidence of record or independent documentary evidence provided by the applicant confirming his entitlement to the PH with 1st OLC, it would be appropriate to award him the PH and correct his record and separation document at this time to show his entitlement to this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the PH for wounds received in action on 11 March 1968; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003769
Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) assists commanders in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Therefore, the evidence is sufficient to add award of the PH to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013097
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004942C070206
It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant held a qualifying infantry MOS, served in a qualifying infantry unit in the RVN, and participated in combat with his unit, as evidence by his being wounded in action on 26 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...