| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his RE (Reenlistment Eligibility) Code of “3” on his 2000 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to RE-1.
APPLICANT STATES: While in a deployed status he received reassignment order to Honduras. He states that he was forced to sign a statement declining continued service when he returned from his deployment, because he did not have sufficient service remaining to fulfill the assignment requirement. He indicated that at the time, it was his intention to leave the Army at his scheduled separation date (ETS) in order to return to Illinois and pursue an engineering degree. Since that time, however, he decided to return to military service via the Air Force. He notes that the Air Force requires an RE-1. The applicant states, in effect, that he served the Army honorably for over 8 years in a variety of assignments, including Panama, Georgia, Kuwait, and during several deployments in support of counter drug operations. He believes he should not be “punished” for separating from the U.S. Army at the end of his required term of service.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He entered active duty on 16 September 1992. By May 1997 he had attained pay grade E-5. He was serving as a helicopter repairman. His awards include an Army Commendation Medal, two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, and two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal. His raters generally rated him as among the best and his senior raters placed him in the first or second block for overall performance and potential.
In November 1997 the applicant reenlisted for a period of 3 years, which established his ETS date as 20 November 2000.
The applicant was notified in October 1999 that he was on assignment instructions for Honduras and that he needed to have 12 months of service remaining on his enlistment contract as of January 2000 in order to comply with the assignment instructions. Following counseling, the applicant declined to take action to extend or reenlist beyond his scheduled ETS date of November 2000 and signed a DCSS (Declination of Continued Service Statement).
On 20 November 2000, upon completion of his contract, the applicant was discharged with an honorable characterization of service. His DD Form 214 indicates he received an SPD (Separation Program Designator) Code of “JBK” and an RE Code of “3.”
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 includes a list of armed forces RE Codes, including RA RE Codes. RE-3 applies to persons who are not fully qualified for reenlistment because they signed a “Declination of Continued Service Statement.” The Army permits individuals with RE Codes of “3” to apply for a waiver in order to return to active service with the Army.
Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that SPD Codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD Codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation. They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data. It notes that “JBK” is the appropriate SPD Code for individuals involuntarily separated upon completion of required service (ETS), except for soldiers with a DCSS in force, who receive an SPD Code “KBK.”
A “cross-reference” chart, provided by officials from the separations branch at the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, confirms that “RE-3” is the appropriate RE code for individuals whose records indicate they have declined to continue their military service via a DCSS.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
2. While the applicant may feel he is being “punished” for leaving the service at his ETS, the evidence shows that he had no choice but to leave, because he chose not to take action to meet service remaining requirements in order to comply with reassignment instructions. Contrary to the applicant’s contention, his RE Code is not a reflection on his honorable service, but rather merely reflects that he was not eligible to reenlist at the time of his separation from active duty because he signed the DCSS.
3. The Board notes that the RE-3 is appropriate and consistent with the reason the applicant left active duty, and the Board finds no basis to correct the existing code. The fact that the Air Force chooses not to permit the applicant to enlist in that service is not sufficient justification to change the applicant’s RE Code.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
(NOTE: Officials at the ARBA Support Division in St. Louis are requested to administratively correct the applicant’s separation document to reflect an SPD Code of KBK vice JBK.)
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FNE __ __MKP__ __LE____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062364 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020207 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.03 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019645
His separation code (SPD) was recorded as JBK and he was assigned an RE Code of RE-3. SPD code KBK is the appropriate code for enlisted Soldier voluntarily discharged upon completion of their required active service who are eligible to reenlist or those with DCSS in force. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010639
Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time confirms she was assigned the SPD code of JBK and a RE-3 code based on the authority and reason for her separation. This list confirms that separation pay is not authorized for members separated with an SPD code of KBK.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020831
It provides that a Soldier being separated due to the completion of their required service the Soldier will be assigned one of the following SPD's * JBK for an involuntary discharge under Army Regulation 635200, chapter 4 (Note 7) * KBK for a voluntary discharge under Army Regulation 635200, chapter 4 (Note 1) * Note 1 To be used for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist or with a DCSS in force who are discharged on completion of enlistment * Note 7 Except for those with a DCSS in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072438C070403
This records review revealed no evidence in regard to the applicant’s SPD code assignment upon his separation in 1989. The evidence of record indicates that at the completion of his first period of service on 24 January 1989, the applicant was assigned a SPD code of JBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3A. However, based on a review of the applicant’s record for his period of active duty service that ended on 16 June 1991, the Board finds no indication that the applicant was barred from,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056093C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. SPD code JBK is the appropriate code for members being discharged, under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of ETS who are ineligible for, barred from, or are otherwise denied reenlistment who are separated on completion of enlistment. The evidence of record confirms that on the date of his discharge, the applicant was ineligible for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020802
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020802 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 20 September 2009, after signing a DCSS, he was separated with an honorable discharge due to completion of required active service and assigned an SPD Code of "KBK" and an RE Code of "3." Based on the available evidence the applicant was appropriately assigned an SPD Code of "KBK" and an RE Code of "3" due to the DCSS that he signed.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006471
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130006471 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The SPD code of KBK is the correct code for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist, or with a DCSS in force, who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, upon the completion of their enlistment. The SPD code of KBK has a corresponding RE code of "RE-3" when a Soldier's record indicates the Soldier has signed a DCSS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024385
His Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 3 June 2009, does not show him flagged at the time. It states that the SPD code KBK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers voluntarily separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be changed to show an SPD of KBK and an RE-1 based on his argument that he had completed his NJP and he was no longer flagged at the time of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062114C070421
The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated March 2001, provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army soldiers and Reserve Component soldiers separated for cause. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The Board notes that the applicant was voluntarily separated from service at his normal ETS under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 4 and was issued an SPD code of “JBK” with a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015958
The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 16 May 2001 for a period of 3 years. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) states the SPD code of "KBK" specified the narrative reason for discharge as "Completion of Required Active Service" with a note that stated this code was to be used for an RA Soldier eligible to reenlist or with a DCSS. The preponderance of evidence in this case shows the applicant was fully qualified for reenlistment at the time...