Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062331C070421
Original file (2001062331C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 14 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062331

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. John E. Denning Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided, that he be reinstated to an active USAR status, and that he be allowed to complete 20 years of service.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was discharged for medical reasons and not only did not know that he was being medically boarded, he does not know the reason he was discharged. He goes on to state that he was within 3 months of completing 20 creditable years of service and lacked only 9 points. He further states that he was not allowed to attend drills after January 1991 and was never notified of such an action pending or any line of duty determinations being made. He also states that his unit has since been dissolved, that he is presently ill and does not have the financial means to pursue other avenues of appeal. Additionally, the Veterans Administration cannot determine why he was medically discharged.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 June 1964 and served until he was honorably released from active duty on 9 June 1967, on the expiration of his term of service. He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) where he remained until he was honorably discharged in 1970.

On 29 August 1974, he enlisted in the USAR with a troop program unit in Houston, Texas. He remained in the USAR through a series of continuous extensions and reenlistments and attained the rank of sergeant (E-5).

The applicant’s medical records were not available for review by the Board. However, his records do contain a copy of an order dated 10 April 1990, which authorized the applicant inactive duty for training on 23 June 1990, for the purpose of taking a Quadrennial Physical Examination and Cardio-Vascular Screening at the Houston VA Hospital. The orders specified that failure to take the required periodic examination would result in discharge. There is no indication of the results of that examination, if it took place.

Although undated, his records contain a typewritten request from the applicant that is addressed to his commander and request that his physical examination be re-done, that he be granted a second opinion and that he receive travel pay to and from the designated location.

On 23 October 1990, the applicant underwent a medical and physical examination by a physician located at the Military Entrance and Processing Station in Houston, Texas. He was diagnosed as having Rheumatoid Arthritis and was found to not be qualified for retention.

On 12 December 1990, the applicant’s unit submitted a request for a medical evaluation of the applicant based on the determination that he was no longer qualified for retention, by reason of medical unfitness.

On 5 January 1991, the command surgeon opined that the applicant’s 23 October 1990, physical examination, revealed that the applicant was diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis and was therefore disqualified for retention in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-14-a (4). A request for discharge was submitted by brigade headquarters to Headquarters, 5th Army, in San Antonio, Texas, on the same day.

On 26 March 1991, orders were published by that headquarters which honorably discharged him from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 12-1, effective the date of the orders.

On 2 October 1996, in response to a congressional inquiry, the Regional Office of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Houston, Texas, informed the congressional representative that the applicant had submitted several claims for service connected disability compensation benefits. In his two previous claims, he claimed defective hearing, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rheumatoid arthritis, an eye problem, a spinal condition and a skin condition secondary to Agent Orange, incurred while on active duty training with Regular and Reserve units. The VA denied his claims and the applicant sent in a notice of disagreement. He was provided a statement of his case and was notified that he had 1 year to file a substantive appeal. However, he failed to do so and the decision of the VA became final.

Army Regulation 40-501 provides information on medical fitness standards for induction, enlistment, appointment, retention and related policies and procedures. It provides, in pertinent part, that it is the responsibility of Reservists to maintain their medical and dental fitness. Normally, Reservists who do not meet the fitness standards set forth by the regulation, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve (if they are eligible and apply for such transfer) or discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178.

Army Regulation 135-178 establishes policies, standards and procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted personnel from the USAR. It provides, in pertinent part, that separation will be accomplished by separation authorities when it has been determined that an enlisted soldier is no longer qualified for retention under Army regulation 40-501, by reason of medical unfitness.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. Although all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge from the USAR are not present in the available records, there is sufficient information to show that he was discharged due to his being deemed medically unfit for retention based on his diagnosed condition of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

3. While the Board cannot ascertain with any degree of certainty how many qualified years of creditable service for retirement purposes the applicant had at the time of his discharge, there is no evidence in the records to show that he ever applied for transfer to the Retired Reserve.

4. Likewise, the Board is not convinced that the applicant was unaware of the condition that deemed him unfit for retention or the fact that he was being processed for separation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was unjustly discharged, there is no basis to void his discharge.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___be___ ___js____ ___jed __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062331
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/02/14
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1991/03/26
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR135-178
DISCHARGE REASON MED UNFIT
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 223 113.0000/SVC CREDIT FOR RET
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006526C070205

    Original file (20060006526C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions under consideration were: (a) Left Knee Condition, Degenerative Joint Disease; and (b) Chronic Pain. Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 12-1, states, in pertinent part, that reserve enlisted soldiers who are no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness under the standards of AR 40-501, chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation Including Retirement), will be discharged unless they are granted a waiver of the medical disqualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510560C070209

    Original file (9510560C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Subsequent to her separation she was granted a combined service connected disability rating of 20 percent by the VA for lower back strain, varicose veins, and a pelvic stress fracture. Army Regulation 135-178 notes that USAR soldiers will be separated when it is determined that an enlisted soldier is no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness unless the soldier request and is granted a waiver or is eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve. Army Regulation 635-40...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506854C070209

    Original file (9506854C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the ARNG with no prior service on 14 January 1974, entered on his initial active duty for training on 4 June 1974, was awarded the military occupational specialty of supply specialist, and was honorably released from active duty and returned to his ARNG unit on 5 December 1974. The PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged with severance pay, rated 10 percent disabled, contingent on the applicant’s unfitting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710210C070209

    Original file (9710210C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel contends that the applicant’s medical condition did not exist prior to service as determined by a physical evaluation board (PEB) or, alternately, that the condition was aggravated by service; and that she should have been retired with a 100 percent disability rating. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 24 September 1990, while serving as a member of the Army Reserve with a unit in San Antonio, Texas, she was ordered to active duty in pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710210

    Original file (9710210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her military records be corrected to show that she was separated from active duty by reason of physical disability. On 14 June 1994 she submitted an application to this Board requesting that her separation document (DD Form 214) reflect the dates that her unit served in the Persian Gulf. Accordingly, there is no basis on which to grant counsel’s request to show that she was promoted to pay grade E-5 at the time of her separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003352

    Original file (20080003352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submitted a copy of a report of investigation - Line of Duty and Misconduct Status, dated 29 June 1990; a partial copy of a DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board Proceedings), with an approval date of 4 January 1991; an Army National Guard Current Annual Statement, with a preparation date of 14 June 1990; a copy of a National Guard Retirement Points Statement - Supplemental Detailed Report, with a preparation date of 3 April 1990; a copy of Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006745

    Original file (20080006745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was advised that she could elect transfer to the Retired Reserve if otherwise eligible based on total qualifying years of service (option 1), that she could elect discharge from the USAR with an honorable discharge (option 2), or that she could elect consideration by a Non-Duty Related Physical Evaluation Board (NDR-PEB) as option 3. The applicant elected consideration by an NDR-PEB (option 3) on 7 March 2005 and sent a letter to the NDR-PEB requesting that she be allowed to continue in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608376C070209

    Original file (9608376C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Thereafter, he was discharged without any benefits for his injuries, and was not even issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, for the period he was on active duty. The applicant’s counsel contends that the applicant was injured in line of duty while he was on active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm, that his injuries were of such severity as to warrant consideration by a medical evaluation board (MEB), that the military physicians treating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009128

    Original file (20100009128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he was retired by reason of physical disability from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) with entitlement to associated benefits. In addition to the FEDS-HEAL document, the applicant also provides the following: * 1991 Army National Guard Annual Retirement Points Statement * Multiple copies of his Body Fat Content Worksheets dated between 1999 and February 2006 * January 2000 statement of medical examination and duty status * January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017521

    Original file (20130017521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document also shows his assigned PULHES or physical profile was 311111 on the date of his separation. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), then in effect, established the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and set forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that applied in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or...